Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:45:38.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spanish Wine Cooperatives’ Business Performance: Innovation Capabilities and Miles and Snow Strategies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2019

Juan-Ramón Ferrer
Affiliation:
Universidad de Zaragoza, Facultad de Empresa y Gestión Pública. Departamento de Dirección y Organización de Empresas. Plaza de la Constitución s/n - 22001Huesca (Spain); e-mail: jchofer@unizar.es.
Silvia Abella-Garcés
Affiliation:
Universidad de Zaragoza, Facultad de Empresa y Gestión Pública. Departamento de Dirección y Organización de Empresas. Plaza de la Constitución s/n - 22001Huesca (Spain); e-mail: sabella@unizar.es.
María-Teresa Maza
Affiliation:
Universidad de Zaragoza, Facultad de Veterinaria. Departamento de Ciencias Agrarias y del Medio Natural. Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón-IA2 (Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA), C/ Miguel Servet, 177- 55013Zaragoza (Spain); e-mail: mazama@unizar.es.

Abstract

Agricultural cooperatives’ economic performance and efficiency today have great economic and social relevance. Consistent with the recent literature, this article examines wine cooperatives and compares them with wine investor-owned firms, studying their innovation capabilities, Miles and Snow strategies, and performance. A survey was conducted in all the wineries in Spain, with 339 responses. The interactions between the independent variables and the dependent variable were analyzed using the logit regression model. The study points out that cooperatives do not have fewer innovation capabilities, nor are they more inefficient, than investor-owned firms, although the factors that modulate their economic performance are different. (JEL Classifications: L66, M10, P13, Q13)

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors thank Karl Storchmann and an anonymous reviewer for their useful comments, and the attendees at the 13th Annual AAWE Conference 2019 hold in Vienna, Austria, for their helpful ideas and recommendations.

References

Aiassa, P., Baltes, M., Danner, S., Frischengruber, H., Horvath, R., Klotz, W., and Vacca, A. (2018). Successful wine cooperatives: Field reports from cooperative managers in Austria, Italy, and Germany. Journal of Wine Economics, 13(3), 243259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, M. (2015). Cooperative organizations as an engine of equitable rural economic development. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management, 3(1), 1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amadieu, P., and Viviani, J. L. (2010). Intangible effort and performance: The case of the French wine industry. Agribusiness, 26(2), 280306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bono, P., Castillo Valero, J. S., and Iliopoulos, C. (2012). Case Study Report; Structure and Strategy of Wine Cooperatives: Comparing Veneto, Italy, to Castilla-La Mancha, Spain. Wageningen: Wageningen UR.Google Scholar
Cabello Medina, C., García Rodríguez, M., Jiménez, A., and Ruiz Navarro, J. (2000). Tipología estratégica de Miles y Snow y factores competitivos: Un análisis empírico. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 7, 365381.Google Scholar
Cadot, J., and Ugaglia, A. A. (2018). The key role of banks in the lifecycle of Bordeaux wine cooperatives. Journal of Wine Economics, 13(3), 309327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camisón, C., Simón, F. G., and Marqués, D. P. (2007). Estrategias competitivas y desempeño empresarial: Estudio comparativo de los modelos de Robinson & Pearce y Miles & Snow en el sector hotelero español. Investigaciones Europeas de dirección y economía de la empresa, 13(3), 161182.Google Scholar
Chiffoleau, Y., Dreyfus, F., Stofer, R., and Touzard, J. M. (2006). Networks, innovation and performance: Evidence from a cluster of wine cooperatives (Languedoc, South of France). In Karantininis, K. and Nilsson, J. (eds.), Vertical Markets and Cooperative Hierarchies: The Role of Cooperatives in the Agri-Food Industry, 3761. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Couderc, J. P., and Marchini, A. (2011). Governance, commercial strategies and performances of wine cooperatives: An analysis of Italian and French wine producing regions. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 23(3), 235257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanasch, P., and Frick, B. (2018). What makes cooperatives successful? Identifying the determinants of their organizational performance. Journal of Wine Economics, 13(3), 282308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., and Coleman, H. J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazzaro, C., Marotta, G., and Rivetti, F. (2016). Responsible innovation in the wine sector: A distinctive value strategy. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 8, 509515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuebling, M., Hammond, R., Behnke, C., Almanza, B., and Sydnor, S. (2016). Kegged wine: Current perceptions and experience within the U.S. wine industry. American Association of Wine Economists, Working Paper No. 199, June. Available at https://www.wine-economics.org/list-of-aawe-working-papers/.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rousseliere, D. (2017). A flexible approach to age dependence in organizational mortality. Comparing the life duration for cooperative and non-cooperative enterprises using a Bayesian generalized additive discrete time survival model. INRA Science & Impact, Working Paper SMART – LERECO N°17-08, October. Available at https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/264214/files/wp17-08.pdf.Google Scholar
Santos-Arteaga, F., and Schamel, G. (2018). Organizational form and payoff imbalances in an aggrievement model: Cooperatives versus privately owned wineries. Journal of Wine Economics, 13(3), 263281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schamel, G. (2018). Guest editor's introduction to the symposium: Organization and performance of cooperative firms in the wine sector. Journal of Wine Economics, 13(3), 260262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexton, R. J., and Iskow, J. (1993). What do we know about the economic efficiency of cooperatives: An evaluative survey. Journal of Agricultural Cooperation, 8, 113.Google Scholar
Snow, C. C., and Hrebiniak, L. G. (1980). Strategy, distinctive competence, and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(2), 317336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soboh, R., Oude Lansink, A., and Van Dijk, G. (2012). Efficiency of cooperatives and investor owned firms revisited. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63(1), 142157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, M., Di Benedetto, C. A., and Nason, R. W. (2007). Capabilities and financial performance: The moderating effect of strategic type. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), 1834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanos, Y. E., and Lioukas, S. (2001). An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: Contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 22(10), 907934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storchmann, K. (2018). Introduction to the issue. Journal of Wine Economics, 13(2), 117118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valette, J., Amadieu, P., and Sentis, P. (2018). Cooperatives versus corporations: Survival in the French wine industry. Journal of Wine Economics, 13(3), 328354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, E., and Kaplan, D. (2005). Innovation and performance improvement in the South African wine industry. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1(3–4), 381399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar