Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T23:35:45.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wine Industry Campaign Contributions and Wine Excise Taxes: Evidence from U.S. States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2018

Shree B. Pokharel
Shree B. Pokharel*
Affiliation:
College of Business and Economics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26501; e-mail: sbpokharel@mix.wvu.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Given the growing importance of the wine industry in the United States, wine special interests are on the rise. Data shows that campaign contributions from the wine industry to officials running for state offices have increased over time. Given this reality, one can expect wine excise tax to remain low in states that receive higher campaign contributions. In addition, there are theoretical and empirical reasons to believe that these tax rates are interdependent based on Tiebout competition and yardstick competition. Based on this reasoning, one can hypothesize wine excise tax rates to be spatially dependent. In this study, I test this hypothesis using state-level campaign contributions data from the National Institute on Money in State Politics and Distilled Spirits Council of the United States, Inc. and find that there is strong statistical evidence of spatial dependence between state wine excise tax rates. (JEL Classifications: C12, C23, H71)

Keywords

campaign contributionsspatial panel data modelwine excise tax rateswine industry
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Wine Economics , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , February 2018 , pp. 3 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © American Association of Wine Economists 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank the anonymous referee and Karl Storchmann for their helpful comments. I would especially like to thank Joshua Hall, John Deskins, and Bryan McCannon at West Virginia University and Donald Lacombe at Texas Tech University for their invaluable feedback. I would also like to thank Denise Roth Barber at the National Institute on Money in State Politics for providing me with enhanced access to the Institute's data and Adam Hoffer at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse for providing me with the majority of the data required for the project.

References

Anderson, K., and Nelgen, S. (2011). Global Wine Markets, 1961 to 2009: A Statistical Compendium. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(3), 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, W. D., Fording, R. C., Ringquist, E. J., Hanson, R. L., and Klarner, C. E. (2010). Measuring citizen and government ideology in the US states: A re-appraisal. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 10(2), 117–135.Google Scholar
Berry, W. D., Ringquist, E. J., Fording, R. C., and Hanson, R. L. (1998). Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960–93. American Journal of Political Science, 42(1), 327–348.Google Scholar
Besley, T. J., and Rosen, H. S. (1998). Vertical externalities in tax setting: Evidence from gasoline and cigarettes. Journal of Public Economics, 70(3), 383–398.Google Scholar
Brueckner, J. K. (2003). Strategic interaction among governments: An overview of empirical studies. International Regional Science Review, 26(2), 175–188.Google Scholar
Brueckner, J. K., and Saavedra, L. A. (2001). Do local governments engage in strategic property tax competition? National Tax Journal, 54(2), 203–229.Google Scholar
Deskins, J., and Hill, B. (2010). Have state tax interdependencies changed over time? Public Finance Review, 38(2), 244–270.Google Scholar
Devereux, M. P., Lockwood, B., and Redoano, M. (2007). Horizontal and vertical indirect tax competition: Theory and some evidence from the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 91(3), 451–479.Google Scholar
Elder, R. W., Lawrence, B., Ferguson, A., Naimi, T. S., Brewer, R. D., Chattopadhyay, S. K., Toomey, T. L., and Fielding, J. E. (2010). The effectiveness of tax policy interventions for reducing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38(2), 217–229.Google Scholar
Elhorst, J. P. (2009). Spatial panel data models. In Fischer, M. M. and Getis, A. (eds.), Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis (ch. 2), 81–103. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Elhorst, J. P. (2010). Applied spatial econometrics: Raising the bar. Spatial Economic Analysis, 5(1), 9–28.Google Scholar
Elhorst, J. P. (2014). Spatial panel data models. In Spatial Econometrics: From Cross-Sectional Data to Spatial Panels (ch. 3), 37–93. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Fell, J. C., Fisher, D. A., Voas, R. B., Blackman, K., and Tippetts, A. S. (2009). The impact of underage drinking laws on alcohol-related fatal crashes of young drivers. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 33(7), 1208–1219.Google Scholar
Fredriksson, P. G., and Mamun, K. A. (2008). Vertical externalities in cigarette taxation: Do tax revenues go up in smoke? Journal of Urban Economics, 64(1), 35–48.Google Scholar
Hines, J. R. (2007). Taxing consumption and other sins. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(1), 49–68.Google Scholar
Hoffer, A. J. (2016). Special-interest spillovers and tobacco taxation. Contemporary Economic Policy, 34(1), 146–157.Google Scholar
Hoffer, A. J., and Pellillo, A. (2012). The political economy of tobacco control spending. Applied Economics Letters, 19(18), 1793–1797.Google Scholar
Hoffer, A. J., Shughart, W. F., and Thomas, M. D. (2014). Sin taxes and sindustry: Revenue, paternalism, and political interest. Independent Review, 19(1), 47–64.Google Scholar
Holcombe, R. G. (1997). Selective excise taxation from an interest-group perspective. In W. S. II (ed.), Taxing Choice: The Predatory Politics of Fiscal Discrimination, 81–103. New Brunswick, NJ and London, UK: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Jordan, S., and Drenkard, S. (2015). How high are wine taxes in your state? 23 June. Retrieved from http://taxfoundation.org/blog/how-high-are-wine-taxes-your-state.Google Scholar
LeSage, J. P., and Dominguez, M. (2012). The importance of modeling spatial spillovers in public choice analysis. Public Choice, 150(3), 525–545.Google Scholar
LeSage, J. P., and Pace, R. K. (2009). Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, S. (1986). The impact of increased availability of wine in grocery stores on consumption: Four case histories. British Journal of Addiction, 81(3), 381–387.Google Scholar
Miron, J. A., and Tetelbaum, E. (2009). Does the minimum legal drinking age save lives? Economic Inquiry, 47(2), 317–336.Google Scholar
MKF Research, LLC. (2007). The impact of wine, grapes and grape products on the American economy 2007: Family businesses building value. Available at https://www.wineinstitute.org/files/mfk_us_econ_report07.pdf (assessed 2 March 2018).Google Scholar
Nelson, J. P. (1990). State monopolies and alcoholic beverage consumption. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2(1), 83–98.Google Scholar
Prat, A. (2002). Campaign spending with office-seeking politicians, rational voters, and multiple lobbies. Journal of Economic Theory, 103(1), 162–189.Google Scholar
Sass, T. R., and Saurman, D. S. (1996). Efficiency effects of exclusive territories: Evidence from the Indiana beer market. Economic Inquiry, 34(3), 597–615.Google Scholar
Snyder, J. M. Jr. (1990). Campaign contributions as investments: The US house of representatives, 1980–1986. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1195–1227.Google Scholar
Sumner, W. G. (1892). The Financier and the Finances of the American Revolution, Volume 2. New York: Dodd, Mead, and Company.Google Scholar
Thornton, J. (2013). American Wine Economics: An Exploration of the US Wine Industry. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424.Google Scholar
Wine Institute (2016). Wine consumption in the US - The Wine Institute. Available at http://www.wineinstitute.org/resources/statistics/article86 (accessed 17 November 2016).Google Scholar
Yakovlev, P. A., and Guessford, W. P. (2013). Alcohol consumption and political ideology: What's party got to do with it? Journal of Wine Economics, 8(3), 335–354.Google Scholar