Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:02:22.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New phylogenetic perspectives among species of South-east Asian wild pig (Sus sp.) based on mtDNA sequences and morphometric data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2005

Vittorio Lucchini
Affiliation:
Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna Selvatica (INFS), 40064 Ozzano Emilia (BO), Italy
Erik Meijaard
Affiliation:
School of Tropical Biology, James Cook University, P.O. Box 6811, QLD 4870, Australia
Cheong H. Diong
Affiliation:
Natural Sciences, NIE, Nanyang Technological University, 637616 Singapore
Colin P. Groves
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
Ettore Randi
Affiliation:
Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna Selvatica (INFS), 40064 Ozzano Emilia (BO), Italy
Get access

Abstract

There are more taxa of wild pig in South-east Asia (SEA) than in any other comparable area in the world, but the number of species and subspecies is still uncertain. The taxonomy of some wild pig populations distributed in Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines, was investigated using molecular and morphometric techniques. Our results suggest the existence of two main evolutionary clades that are likely to have diverged during the Pliocene in SEA: one including wild pig populations distributed in the Philippines (Sus cebifrons) and Sulawesi (S. celebensis); the other including the Indonesian and Malaysian bearded pigs (S. barbatus), and the widespread Eurasian wild boar (S. scrofa). A possible scenario for pig speciation in SEA is developed, and the need for a taxonomic revision of bearded pigs suggested, particularly concerning the taxonomic status of S. b. ahoenobarbus from Palawan Island, and the existence a new species distributed in the Tawi Tawi Islands (Philippines). Unexpectedly, bearded pigs in the Malay Peninsula are closely related to the Bornean population, but distinct from Sumatran S. barbatus, and they should be considered as belonging to a different subspecies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2005 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)