Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T05:47:15.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structure and variability of bat social calls: implications for specificity and individual recognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2003

Guido Pfalzer
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Kaiserslautern, Erwin-Schroedinger-Strasse 13/14, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
Jürgen Kusch
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Kaiserslautern, Erwin-Schroedinger-Strasse 13/14, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Communication sounds or ‘social calls’ of 16 European bat species (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) were recorded at a range of roost and foraging sites. A comparative analysis of more than 5400 individual calls for general structures and for inter- as well as intraspecific variability resulted in 50 types of calls, which differed by their specific structure and by the calling species. These types could be grouped into four different general types of calls, according to the kind and complexity of their structure, independent of the calling species. Distinct types of calls seem to have similar functions in different bat species. One general type may be used predominantly in female–infant interactions as an isolation or direction call, which serves as mutual recognition. This type of social call was also used in ‘tandem flights’ of pairs of bats, which might increase individual knowledge of roost sites and foraging success. A second type was used in mate attraction, and a further one in an aggressive context. The fourth one was used by hindered or distressed bats. The group of ‘aggressive’ calls is least variable, but the complex mating calls and isolation calls are very diverse. Species-specific sound structures were identified, which allowed a computational species distinction. The measured inter-individual variability of social calls should be significant for their functions in individual recognition. So, beyond common features concerning the frequency structure of bat social calls, interspecific differences, as well as the intraspecific variability of details of sonagraphic parameters, should elucidate the specific functions of the calls.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)