Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T16:25:21.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Facial growth and the ontogeny of morphological variation within and between the primates Cebus apella and Cercocebus torquatus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2001

Paul O'Higgins
Affiliation:
Evolutionary Anatomy Unit, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, University College London, Rockefeller Building, University Street, London WC1E 6JJ, U.K.
Pippa Chadfield
Affiliation:
Evolutionary Anatomy Unit, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, University College London, Rockefeller Building, University Street, London WC1E 6JJ, U.K.
Nicholas Jones
Affiliation:
Evolutionary Anatomy Unit, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, University College London, Rockefeller Building, University Street, London WC1E 6JJ, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

Differences in facial skeletal form arise in part through differences in growth and in part through differences in embryonic patterning and proportioning. This study examines post-natal facial growth, sexual dimorphism and adult differences within and between two primate species: Cebus apella and Cercocebus torquatus. The species were chosen because they are phylogenetically distant yet present roughly similar adult morphologies. The comparison of ontogenetic, sexual and phylogenetic differences between these species illuminates the relationship between pre-natal proportioning, growth, sexual dimorphism and evolutionary change in the facial skeleton.

The quantitative analytical methods used in this study are taken from the geometric morphometric toolkit. Additionally, facial growth is examined through scanning electron microscope studies of bone growth remodelling. The main findings are that adult sexual dimorphism differs markedly between the studied species. In both species, however, it arises through extension in males relative to females of a common size–shape growth trajectory plus late divergence of growth between the sexes. This similarity contrasts with the findings that growth remodelling in the facial skeleton and size-related shape changes in the face of each species differ. Thus, variations in facial form between species seem to be the result of pre-natally established differences in form plus post-natal growth divergence, whilst the different sexual dimorphisms of these species arise through the action of similar growth processes on divergent growth trajectories. The implications of these findings for the interpretation of adult variations in facial form and growth are considered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2001 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)