Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:19:46.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inter-specific variation in Macropus crania: form, function and phylogeny

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2002

Nicholas Milne
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Human Biology, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia 6907
Paul O'Higgins
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

Morphological variation was studied in the crania of seven species of kangaroos and wallabies (Macropus). How function and phylogeny interact to influence cranial form amongst adults of diverse species was considered. Thirty-six, three-dimensional landmarks were acquired on each of 65 adult Macropus specimens from Western Australia. The different species occupy a wide range of habitats and latitudes and there are well-known differences in diet among the species. Size and shape variability was examined using the methods of geometric morphometrics. Aspects of inter-specific variation explained by principal components were visualized and examined for correlations with size, latitude, and diet. The first principal component correlates strongly with inter-specific differences in latitude and it primarily contrasts species on the basis of the relative length of the snout anterior to the molar teeth, this being greater in species that live in cooler climates. Species scores on the second principal component correlate strongly with centroid size such that smaller crania have more flexed muzzles. Principal component three separates the short grass-eating, red kangaroo M. rufus, from all other species (most of which eat tough herbage from trees and shrubs). This principal component represents differences in the masticatory apparatus. Variation on the fourth principal component also seems to be functionally interpretable in terms of further differences in the masticatory apparatus of M. agilis. The relationship between phylogeny and cranial form was investigated by comparing a phenogram based on the shape distances between taxa with a consensus phylogeny drawn from the literature on Macropus genetics, ecology and morphology. The phenogram shows considerable similarity to current taxonomic views, but, our results also indicate differences that are related to function. Thus, this study serves to unravel the interaction of functional and phylogenetic influences on cranial form amongst Macropus species and raises further issues relating to ontogeny and phylogeny.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2002 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)