Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:55:39.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphological correlates of substrate use in didelphid marsupials: implications for primate origins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1999

Pierre Lemelin
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, 4209 State Route 44, P.O. Box 95, Rootstown, OH 44272-0095, U.S.A. Present address: Department of Biological Anthropology and Anatomy, Box 3170, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, U.S.A. E-mail: pierre_lemelin@baa.mc.duke.edu
Get access

Abstract

The ability of some mammals to forage on vines or terminal branches depends upon their grasping extremities. This study tests the functional link between use of small-diameter supports and grasping abilities by comparing hand and foot proportions in didelphid marsupials. Metapodials and phalanges were measured for the hands and feet of six didelphid taxa characterized by different patterns of substrate use. Comparisons of hand and foot proportions demonstrate that Marmosa and Caluromys, didelphids that rely on vines or terminal branches, possess more prehensile extremities than Monodelphis, Didelphis, and Philander, which travel and feed mainly on the ground. Moreover, the proportions of the hand and foot of Marmosa and Caluromys are more similar to those of cheirogaleid primates than those of other didelphids. These morphological data corroborate the suggestion that the use of branches of small diameter was an important factor in the development of prehensile hands and feet in early primates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
1999 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)