Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:47:59.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Population subdivision among mouflon sheep (Ovis gmelini) ewes and ranging behaviour of rams during the rut

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2002

Ana Gonçalves Martins
Affiliation:
CBA/DZA, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, C2, P3, Campo Grande, P-1700 Lisboa, Portugal
Newton Tércio Netto
Affiliation:
Institut de Recherches sur les Grands Mammifères, INRA, BP 27, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan Cedex, France
Stéphane Aulagnier
Affiliation:
Institut de Recherches sur les Grands Mammifères, INRA, BP 27, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan Cedex, France
Ana Borges
Affiliation:
CBA/DZA, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, C2, P3, Campo Grande, P-1700 Lisboa, Portugal
Michel Dubois
Affiliation:
Institut de Recherches sur les Grands Mammifères, INRA, BP 27, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan Cedex, France
Luis Vicente
Affiliation:
CBA/DZA, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, C2, P3, Campo Grande, P-1700 Lisboa, Portugal
Jean-François Gerard
Affiliation:
Institut de Recherches sur les Grands Mammifères, INRA, BP 27, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan Cedex, France
Marie-Line Maublanc
Affiliation:
Institut de Recherches sur les Grands Mammifères, INRA, BP 27, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan Cedex, France
Get access

Abstract

Population subdivision among mouflon sheep Ovis gmelini ewes and ranging behaviour of rams were investigated in the Caroux-Espinouse massif (southern France). Radio-tracking data from 32 ewes and 41 rams monitored in the course of a 10-year study were used to identify female units and to document the movement patterns of males during the rutting period. Cluster analyses, based on the distance between arithmetic centres and on the degree of overlap of locations, were computed. Ewes were found to be partitioned in three or four main units to which they were faithful. Movement patterns of rams were much more variable: half were faithful to a rutting range, overlapping one or more unit(s), and the others were not. We suggest that a combination of social and spatial attachment could explain this ranging behaviour. Females build up their spatial habits following their mothers and, when adults, they occupy the area where they have been reared. Their spatial attachment is consistent with their social preferences for other females. Males balance between antagonistic spatial attachment and social preferences for other males, and differ in terms of spatial behaviour. The genetic implications are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2002 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)