Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:06:42.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

River dolphins and flooded forest: seasonal habitat use and sexual segregation of botos (Inia geoffrensis) in an extreme cetacean environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2004

A. R. Martin
Affiliation:
NERC Sea Mammal Research Unit, Gatty Marine Laboratory, University of St Andrews, Fife KY16 8LB, U.K.
V. M. F. da Silva
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Mamíferos Aquáticos, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, CP 478, 69011-790 Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
Get access

Abstract

Habitat use by the boto, or Amazon river dolphin Inia geoffrensis, was investigated in and around the Mamirauá Reserve, Brazil. Largely forested with numerous channels and lakes, Mamirauá comprises a variety of seasonal floodplain habitats known collectively as várzea. The annual cycle of flooding in this region (amplitude 11–15 m) dominates all life. Profound seasonal differences in dolphin density between habitats were consistent with known fish movements, in turn dictated by changes in water level and dissolved oxygen. An exodus of botos from floodplain to river at low water prevents dolphins being trapped in areas that become entirely dry. Densities of botos in floodplain channels were seasonally higher (up to 18 km−2) than reported for any cetacean worldwide. Adults were largely segregated by sex except at low water. Females and calves dominated in chavascal habitat–the areas most remote from rivers, which were preferred by males. Probable causes of this segregation are the energetic requirements of calves and the safety of females and/or calves from male harassment. Some 80% of botos occurring on rivers were within 150 m of the margins. The reliance of adult females and calves on várzea in a region with exceptional dolphin densities demonstrates the importance of floodplain habitats for the boto, and may be the key determinant of this species‘ distribution.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2004 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)