Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:27:20.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant on Race and Barbarism: Towards a More Complex View on Racism and Anti-Colonialism in Kant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2019

Oliver Eberl
Oliver Eberl*
Affiliation:
Leibniz Universität Hannover
*
Email: o.eberl@ipw.uni-hannover.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Whether Kant’s late legal theory and his theory of race are contradictory in their account of colonialism has been a much-debated question that is also of highest importance for the evaluation of the Enlightenment’s contribution to Europe’s colonial expansion and the dispossession and enslavement of native and black peoples. This article discusses the problem by introducing the discourse on barbarism. This neglected discourse is the original and traditional European colonial vocabulary and served the justification of colonialism from ancient Greece throughout the Renaissance to the eighteenth century. Kant’s explicit rejection of this discourse and its prejudices reveals his early critical stance toward colonial judgements of native peoples even before he developed his legal theory. This development of his critical position can be traced in his writings on race: although he makes racist statements in these texts, his theory of race is not meant to ground moral judgements on ‘races’ or a racial hierarchy but to defend the unity of mankind under the given empirical reality of colonial hierarchies.

Keywords

theory of raceracismcolonialismbarbarismlegal theoryphysical geographynatural historynative peoplesanthropophagyclimate theorytravel writingsGeorg Forster
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , September 2019 , pp. 385 - 413
Copyright
© Kantian Review, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkhaus, Annette (2006) ‘Rasse: Zur Genese eines spezifisch neuzeitlichen Ordnungsbegriffs’. In Bay, Hansjörg and Merten, Kau (eds), Die Ordnung der Kulturen: Zur Konstruktion ethnischer, nationaler und zivilisatorischer Differenzen 1750–1850 (Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann), pp. 33–52.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert (2001) ‘Who Invented the Concept of Race? Kant’s Role in the Enlightenment Construction of Race’. In Bernasconi, Robert (ed.), Race (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers), pp. 11–36.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert (2002) ‘Kant as an Unfamiliar Source of Racism’. In Ward, Julie K. and Lott, Tommy L. (eds), Philosophers on Race: Critical Essays (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers), pp. 145–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert (2011) ‘Kant’s Third Thoughts on Race’. In Elden, Stuart and Mendieta, Eduardo (eds), Reading Kant’s Geography (Albany, NY: SUNY Press), pp. 291–318.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Alyssa R. (2014) ‘The Rights of States, the Rule of Law, and Coercion: Reflections on Pauline Kleingeld’s Kant and Cosmopolitanism ’. Kantian Review, 19/2, 233–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertram, Chris (2010) Ripstein, Kant, and Barbarism. http://crookedtimber.org/2010/09/21/ripstein-kant-and-barbarism/ (accessed 25 June 2018).Google Scholar
Boletsi, Maria (2013) Barbarism and its Discontents. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borst, Arno (1988) ‘Barbaren. Geschichte eines europäischen Schlagwortes’. In Borst, Arno, Barbaren, Ketzer und Artisten. Welten des Mittelalters (Munich: Piper), pp. 19–31.Google Scholar
Detel, Wolfgang (1995) ‘Griechen und Barbaren: Zu den Anfängen des abendländischen Rassismus’. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 43/6, 1019–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberl, Oliver (2018) ‘Der Staat und die Fremden: “Barbarei”, “Edle Wilde” und die Kritik der Gesellschaft mit Montaigne und Rousseau’. In Campagna, Norbert and Martinsen, Franziska (eds), Staatsverständnisse in Frankreich (Baden-Baden: Nomos), pp. 223–42.Google Scholar
Eberl, Oliver and Niesen, Peter (2011) Immanuel Kant. Zum Ewigen Frieden/Auszüge aus der Rechtslehre: Kommentar. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Elden, Stuart and Mendieta, Eduardo (eds) (2011) Reading Kant’s Geography. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Ette, Ottmar (2014) Anton Wilhelm Amo. Philosophieren ohne festen Wohnsitz: Eine Philosophie der Aufklärung zwischen Europa und Afrika. Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos.Google Scholar
Eze, Emmanuel Chukwudi (1997) ‘The Color of Reason: The Idea of “Race” in Kant’s Anthropology’. In Eze, Emmanuel (ed.), Postcolonial African Philosophy. A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers), pp. 103–33.Google Scholar
Fink-Eitel, Hinrich (1984) Die Philosophie und die Wilden: Über die Bedeutung des Fremden für die europäische Geistesgeschichte. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin and Ypi, Lea (eds) (2014) Kant and Colonialism: Historical and Critical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, Georg (1969) ‘Noch etwas über die Menschenraßen’. In Forster, Georg, Werke in Bänden, vier. Ed. Gerhard Steiner, vol. 2 (Frankfurt am Main: Insel), pp. 71–101.Google Scholar
Forster, Georg (2000) A Voyage Round the World, vol. 1. Ed. Thomas, Nicholas and Berghof, Oliver. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Aaron (2000) ‘Hume’s Revised Racism Revisited’. Hume Studies, 26/1, 171–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girtanner, Christoph (1796) Ueber das Kantische Prinzip für die Naturgeschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Godel, Rainer and Stiening, Gideon (eds) (2012) Kopffechterreien – Missverständnisse – Widersprüche? Methodische und methodologische Perspektiven auf die Kant-Forster-Kontroverse. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
Harari, Yuval Noah (2015) Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried (1800) Outlines of a Philosophy of the History of Man. Trans. Churchill, T.. Great Turnstile, Lincoln’s-Inn Fields: Luke Hansard.Google Scholar
Hume, David (n.d.) Essays, Literary, Moral, and Political. London: Ward, Lock & Co.Google Scholar
Hund, Wulf D. (1999) ‘Im Schatten des Glücks: Philosophischer Rassismus bei Aristoteles und Kant’. In Hund, Wulf, Rassismus: Die soziale Konstruktion natürlicher Ungleichheit (Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot), pp. 110–26.Google Scholar
Hund, Wulf D. (2011) ‘It Must Come from Europe: The Racism of Immanuel Kant’. In Hund, Wulf D., Koller, Christian and Zimmermann, Moshe (eds), Racism Made in Germany (Vienna and Berlin: Lit Verlag), pp. 69–98.Google Scholar
Jablonski, Nina G. (2012) Living Color: The Biological and Social Meaning of Skin Color. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996) Practical Philosophy. Trans. and ed. Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2000) Critique of the Power of Judgment. Ed. Guyer, Paul, trans. Guyer, Paul and Matthews, Eric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2007) Anthropology, History, and Education. Ed. Louden, Robert B. and Zöller, Günter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2012) Natural Science. Ed. Watkins, Eric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2016) Lectures and Drafts on Political Philosophy. Ed. Rauscher, Fred. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (2007) ‘Kant’s Second Thoughts on Race’. Philosophical Quarterly, 229, 573–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2012) Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Idea of World Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2014) ‘Kant’s Second Thoughts on Colonialism’. In Flikschuh, Katrin and Ypi, Lea (eds), Kant and Colonialism: Historical and Critical Perspectives (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 43–67.Google Scholar
Koller, Christian (2011) ‘Racism Made in Germany. Without “Sonderweg” to a “Rupture in Civilization”’. In Hund, Wolf D., Koller, Christian and Zimmermann, Moshe (eds), Racism Made in Germany (Vienna and Berlin: LIT Verlag), pp. 9–40.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart (2006) ‘Zur historisch-politischen Semantik asymmetrischer Gegenbegriffe’. In Koselleck, Reinhart, Vergangene Zukunft: Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp), pp. 211–59.Google Scholar
Lahontan, Louis Armand de (1973) Dialogues avec un sauvage. Paris: Éditions Sociales.Google Scholar
Lahontan, Louis Armand de (1982) Neueste Reisen nach dem mitternächtlichen Amerika. Berlin: Freitag Verlag.Google Scholar
Lepenies, Wolf (1988) ‘Georg Forster als Anthropologe und Schriftsteller’. In Lepenies, Wolf, Autoren und Wissenschaftler im 18. Jahrhundert (Munich and Vienna: Carl Hanser), pp. 121–54.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas A. (2009) Race, Empire, and the Idea of Human Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, Ronald L. (2010) Social Sciences and the Ignoble Savage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles W. (2005) ‘Kant’s Untermenschen’. In Valls, Andrew (ed.), Race and Racism in Modern Philosophy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), pp. 167–93.Google Scholar
Münkler, Herfried (2008) ‘Barbaren und Dämonen: Die Konstruktion des Fremden in Imperialen Ordnungen’. In Baberowski, Jörg, Kaelble, Hartmut and Schriewer, Jürgen (eds), Selbstbilder und Fremdbilder: Repräsentationen sozialer Ordnung im Wandel (Frankfurt/New York: Campus), pp. 153–89.Google Scholar
Muthu, Sankar (2003) Enlightenment Against Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nippel, Wilfried (1990) Griechen, Barbaren und ‘Wilde’: Alte Geschichte und Sozialanthropologie. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
Osterhammel, Jürgen (2005) ‘The Great Work of Uplifting Mankind’. In Osterhammel, Jürgen and Barth, Boris (eds), Zivilisierungsmissionen: Imperialie Weltverbesserung seit dem 18. Jahrhundert (Konstanz: Universitätsverlag Konstanz), pp. 363–425.Google Scholar
Pagden, Anthony (1982) The Fall of Natural Man: The American Indian and the Origins of Comparative Ethnology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pagden, Anthony (1990) ‘Dispossessing the Barbarian: The Language of Spanish Thomism and the Debate over the Property Rights of the American Indians’. In Pagden, Anthony (ed.), The Languages of Political Theory in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 79–98.Google Scholar
Peitsch, Helmut (2006) ‘“Noch war die halbe Oberfläche der Erdkugel von tiefer Nacht bedeckt.” Georg Forster über die Bedeutung der Reisen der europäischen “Seemächte” für das deutsche “Publikum”’. In Hans-Lüsebrink, Jürgen (ed.), Das Europa der Aufklärung (Göttingen: Wallstein), pp. 157–74.Google Scholar
Rawson, Claude (2001) God, Gulliver, and Genocide: Barbarism and European Imagination, 1492–1945. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur (2009) Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur (2016) ‘Just War, Regular War, and Perpetual Peace’. Kant-Studien, 107, 179–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandford, Stella (2018) ‘Kant, Race, and Natural History’. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 44, 950–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner (2011) ‘Kant’s Lectures on “Physical Geography”: A Brief Outline of its Origins, Transmission, and Development: 1754–1805’. In Elden, Stuart and Mendieta, Eduardo (eds), Reading Kant’s Geography (Albany, NY: SUNY Press), pp. 69–85.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan (1985) Die Eroberung Amerikas: Das Problem des Anderen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Valdez, Inés (2017) ‘It’s Not about Race: Good Wars, Bad Wars, and the Origins of Kant’s Anti-Colonialism’. American Political Science Review, 111/4, 819–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Horn, Tanja (2004) Dem Leibe abgelesen: Georg Forster im Kontext der physischen Anthropologie des 18. Jahrhunderts. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel (2006) European Universalism: The Rhetoric of Power. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Howard (2014) ‘Colonialism in Kant’s Political Philosophy’. Diametros, 39, 154–81.Google Scholar