No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Beyond Notes on a Napkin: A Précis of The Origins of Kant’s Aesthetics and Replies to My Critics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 March 2025
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Keywords
- Type
- Author Meets Critics
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review
References
Clewis, Robert R. (2021) Kant’s Humorous Writings: An Illustrated Guide. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. (2023) The Origins of Kant’s Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. (2025) ‘Humor and the Arts: Taking Kant Seriously’. In Amir, Lydia (ed.), Philosophy of Humor Yearbook (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 301–5.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah (1990) The Role of Taste in Kant’s Theory of Cognition. New York and London: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah (2017) ‘In defence of the one-act view: Reply to Guyer’. British Journal of Aesthetics, 57, 421–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grote, Simon (2017) The Emergence of Modern Aesthetic Theory: Religion and Morality in Enlightenment Germany and Scotland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1997) Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2017) ‘One act or two? Hannah Ginsborg on aesthetic judgement’. British Journal of Aesthetics, 57, 407–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnaman, Ted (2024) ‘Kant on aesthetic normativity’. In Valdez, Edgar (ed.), Re-Thinking Kant, Volume 7 (Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing), 41–50.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice (2006) ‘Kant’s leading thread in the Analytic of the Beautiful’. In Kukla, Rebecca (ed.), Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 194–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matherne, Samantha (2019) ‘Kant on aesthetic autonomy and common sense’. Philosophers’ Imprint, 19(24), 1–22.Google Scholar
McQuillan, J. Colin (2016). Immanuel Kant: The Very Idea of a Critique of Pure Reason. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menzer, Paul (1952) Kants Ästhetik in ihrer Entwicklung. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olin, Lauren (2025) ‘All in good taste’. In Amir, Lydia (ed.), Philosophy of Humor Yearbook (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 287–99.Google Scholar
Reiter, Aviv and Geiger, Ido (2024) ‘Kant’s missing analytic of artistic beauty’. European Journal of Philosophy, 32(2), 360–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggle, Nick (2022) ‘Toward a communitarian theory of aesthetic value’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 80, 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueger, Alexander (2024) Kant on Pleasure and Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shell, Susan Meld (2022) The Politics of Beauty: A Study of Kant’s Critique of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaccarino Bremner, Sabina (2021) ‘On conceptual revision and aesthetic judgement’. Kantian Review, 26, 531–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, Christian (2005) An Introduction to Kant’s Aesthetics: Core Concepts and Problems. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Jessica J. (2024) ‘Autonomy and community in Kant’s theory of taste’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 82, 204–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winegar, Reed (2024) ‘The beautiful and the sublime in Kant’s early natural philosophy’. In Pollok, Konstantin (ed.), Knowledge, Freedom, and Taste: Internationaler Kant-Preis 2024: Paul Guyer (Kant-Studien Supplementa 1) (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zammito, John (1992) The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel (2007) Kant on Beauty and Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar