Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T16:51:34.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Kant's Rejection of the Right to Resist Make Him a Legal Rigorist? Instantiation and Interpretation in the Rechtslehre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Radu Neculau
Radu Neculau
Affiliation:
University of Windsor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is generally acknowledged that Kant's political philosophy stands on a par with the great works of the Western liberal tradition. It is also a matter of agreement that the rational principles on which it rests represent an adequate philosophical expression of the progressive agenda that was inaugurated by the Enlightenment and fulfilled, with varying degrees of success, by the French Revolution. Yet Kant's philosophical position is ambiguous when it comes to evaluating that momentous event in modern history. We know, from anecdotal evidence, some surviving letters, several cryptic references in his published works, as well as a number of posthumously published reflections, that Kant was enthusiastic about and strongly approved of the changes that were taking place in France at the time. He certainly condemned, in strong and unequivocal terms, the execution of Louis XVI. But this did not translate into a repudiation of his support for the revolution. And he seems to have found even in this case mitigating circumstances that explained the revolutionaries' decision to execute the monarch, thus in fact excusing their action. Moreover, he argued that all post-revolutionary governments ought to command the same kind of loyalty from their subjects as the ones they replaced, which appears to justify Kant's contention in the Idea for a Universal History that political violence can be a vehicle of progress. Furthermore, in the Contest of Faculties Kant went so far as to identify in the enthusiastic response of the ‘spectators’ to the French Revolution a clear sign of the moral disposition of humankind (CF 182/7: 85).

Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , July 2008 , pp. 107 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apel, K.-O. (1998) Auflösung der Diskursethik? Zur Architektonik der Diskursdifferenzierung in Habermas' Faktizität und Geltung. In K.-O., Apel (ed.), Diskurs und Verantwortung (Frankfurt/Main: Suhkramp).Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1982) Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy, ed. by Ronald, Beiner (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, R. F. (1992) Kant's moral and political rigorism. In Williams, Howard Lloyd (ed.), Essays on Kant's Political Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Axinn, Sidney (1971) Kant, authority, and the French Revolution. Journal of the History of Ideas, 32(1): 423–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Lewis White (1971) Kant and the right of revolution. Journal of the History of Ideas, 32(1): 411–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, Robert B. (1999) Some pragmatist themes in Hegel's idealism: negotiation and administration in Hegel's account of the structure and content of conceptual norms. European Journal of Philosophy, 7(1): 165–7; reprinted as chapter 7 of Robert B. Brandom, Tales of the Mighty Dead (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhr, Manfred, and Wilfried, Lehrke (1989) Beziehungen der Philosophic Kants zur Französischen Revolution. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 37: 628–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetscher, Iring (1976) Immanuel Kant und die Französische Revolution. In Zwi, Batscha (ed.), Materialien zu Kants Rechtsphilosophie (Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1990) Wahrheit und Methode: Gesammelte Schriften 1 (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) Verlag).Google Scholar
Goyard-Fabre, Simone (2000) Kant et le droit d'opposition. In François, Duchesneau, Guy, Lafrance and Claude, Piché; (eds), Kant actuel: hommage à Pierre Laberge (Montréal: Bellarmin and Vrin).Google Scholar
Grcic, Joseph (1986) Kant on revolution and economic inequality. Kant-Studien, 77: 447–57.Google Scholar
Gurwitsch, Alexander (1976) Immanuel Kant und die Aufklärung. In Zwi, Batscha (ed.), Materialien zu Kants Rechtsphilosophie (Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1973) Theory and Practice, trans, by John, Viertel (Boston: Beacon Press).Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter (1976) Kant über die Revolution. In Zwi, Batscha (ed.), Materialien zu Kants Rechtsphilosophie (Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Hill, Thomas E., Jr. (1997) A Kantian perspective on political violence. Journal of Ethics, 1: 105–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtman, Sarah Williams (2002) Revolution, contradictions, and Kantian citizenship. In Mark, Timmons (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kersting, Wolfgang (1984) Wohlgeordnete Freiheit: Immanuel Kants Rechtsund Staatsphilosophie (Berlin: W de Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kersting, Wolfgang. (1992) Kant's concept of the state. In Williams, Howard Lloyd (ed.), Essays on Kant's Political Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1997) Taking the law into our own hands. In Andrews, Reath, Barbara, Herman and Christine, Korsgaard (eds), Reclaiming the History of Ethics: Essays for John Rawls (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Losurdo, Domenico (1993) Autocensure et compromis dans la philosophie politique de Kant, trans, by J.-M., Buee (Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, Bernd (2002) Whence public right? In Mark, Timmons (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Neculau, Radu (2008) The sublimity of violence: Kant and the aesthetic response to the French Revolution. Symposium, 12(1): 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Peter (1976) Kant on the duty never to resist. Ethics, 86: 214–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Peter. (1992) Kant, revolutions and history. In Williams, Howard Lloyd (ed.), Essays on Kant's Political Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora (2000) Kant and the social contract tradition. In François, Duchesneau, Guy, Lafrance and Claude, Piche (eds), Kant actuel: hommage à Pierre Laberge (Montréal: Bellarmin and Vrin).Google Scholar
Palmer, Richard (1969) Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas W. (2002) Is Kant's Rechtslehre a comprehensive liberalism? In Mark, Timmons (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Reiss, H. S. (1950) Kant and the right of rebellion. Journal of the History of Ideas, 17: 179–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renaut, Alain (1997) Kant aujourd'hui (Paris: Aubier).Google Scholar
Riley, Patrick (1991) Hannah Arendt on Kant. In Gerhard, Funke (ed.), Akten des Siebenten Intemationalen Kant-Kongresses, Band II. 2 (Bonn: Bouvier Verlag).Google Scholar
Rosen, Allen D. (1993) Kant's Theory of Justice (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Seebohm, Thomas (1981) Kant's theory of revolution. Social Research, 48: 557–87.Google Scholar
Spaemann, Robert (1976) Kants Kritik des Widerstandsrechts. In Zwi Batscha (ed.), Materialien zu Kants Rechtsphilosophie (Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
Willascheck, Marcus (2002) Which imperatives for right? On the nonprescriptive character of juridical laws in Kant's Metaphysics of Morals. In Mark, Timmons (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Williams, Howard (1983) Kant's Political Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Witt, Ernst-Jan C. (1999) Kant and the limits of civil obedience. Kant-Studien, 90: 290–4.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2002) The final form of Kant's practical philosophy. In Mark, Timmons (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of Morals. Interpretative Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Yovel, Yirmiahu (1998) Kant's practical reason as will: interest, recognition, judgment, and choice. Review of Metaphysics, 5: 267–99.Google Scholar