Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:49:38.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Freedom from Autonomy: An Essay on Accountability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2020

Brian O’connor
Brian O’connor*
Affiliation:
University College Dublin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Neo-Kantian philosophers see accountability as a key property of autonomy, or of social freedom more broadly. Autonomy, among those theorists, is, I contend, implicitly co-conceived with responsibility, producing a quasi-juridical conception of autonomy and a limiting notion of freedom. This article criticizes the connecting of freedom with accountability on a number of grounds. First, various conceptions of autonomy not only operate without a notion of accountability, but, in fact, would be impaired by an accountability requirement. Second, the neo-Kantians are unable to defend the freedom enhancing properties that are supposedly brought about by the giving of reasons for one’s beliefs and actions. Third, the project of accountability is indifferent to personal outlooks, not because it takes a holistic perspective, but because of its interest in social convergence.

Keywords

accountabilityanswerabilityauthenticityautonomyindividualityneo-Kantianismreasonssingularity
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 25 , Special Issue 4: Special Issue on Kant and the Frankfurt School , December 2020 , pp. 655 - 674
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Joel, and Axel, Honneth (2005) ‘Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice’. In John, Christman and Joel, Anderson (eds), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 127–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colburn, Ben (2011) ‘Autonomy and Adaptive Preferences’. Utilitas, 23 (1), 52–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, Maeve (2004) ‘Privacy and Autonomy: A Comment on Jean Cohen’. In Beate, Rössler (ed.), Privacies: Philosophical Evaluations (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press), 98–112.Google Scholar
Cooke, Maeve (2006) Re-Presenting the Good Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forst, Rainer (2012) The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice. Trans. Jeffrey Flynn. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1992) Postmetaphysical Thinking. Trans. William Mark Hohengarten, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (2006) ‘Religion in the Public Sphere’. European Journal of Philosophy, 14 (1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich (2009) Main Philosophical Writings and the Novel Allwill. Ed. and trans. George di Giovanni. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996) Practical Philosophy. Trans. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart (1988) Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society. Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas (1992) Doctor Faustus. The Life of a German Composer Adrian Leverkühn as Told by a Friend. Trans. Lowe-Porter, H. T.. London: Everyman’s Library.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Brian (2013) ‘Self-Determination and Responsibility in Schelling’s Freiheitsschrift ’. Studies in Social and Political Thought, 21, 3–18.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Brian (2015) ‘The Neo-Hegelian Theory of Freedom and the Limits of Emancipation’. European Journal of Philosophy, 23 (2), 171–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. (1972) ‘A Theory of Freedom of Expression’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1 (2), 204–26.Google Scholar
Velleman, J. David (2006) Self to Self: Selected Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Peter (1965) Marat/Sade. Trans. Geoffrey Skelton. London: Marion Boyars.Google Scholar