Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:00:31.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From the Theory and Practice of International Right to a Philosophy of International Law - Kant and the Theory and Practice of International Right. By Georg Cavallar. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1999. £13.99 (pbk), £25.00 (hbk). ISBN 0-7083-1508-9 (pbk), 0-7083-1509-7 (hbk). - A Philosophy of International Law. By Fernando R Tesón. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998. £17.17, $25.00. ISBN 0-8133-6864-2 (pbk), 0-8133-1131-4 (hbk).

Review products

Kant and the Theory and Practice of International Right. By Georg Cavallar. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1999. £13.99 (pbk), £25.00 (hbk). ISBN 0-7083-1508-9 (pbk), 0-7083-1509-7 (hbk).

A Philosophy of International Law. By Fernando R Tesón. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998. £17.17, $25.00. ISBN 0-8133-6864-2 (pbk), 0-8133-1131-4 (hbk).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2011

Christopher Harding
Affiliation:
Department of Law, University of Wales, Aberystwyth

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law, 5th edn. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998), p. 32.Google Scholar For Lauterpacht's original argument, see, for example, his International Law and Human Rights (Stevens, 1950).

2 For an overview of such developments, see for example, Harding, Christopher, ‘Democratic rights in European law: taking stock at the close of the twentieth century’, Oregon Review of International Law (2000).Google Scholar

3 Cassese, Antonio, ‘Ex iniuria ius oritur: are we moving towards international legitimation of forcible humanitarian countermeasures in the world community?’, European Journal of International Law, 10 (1999), 23, at p. 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar