Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:05:50.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kantian Dignity and Marxian Socialism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2017

Pablo Gilabert
Pablo Gilabert*
Affiliation:
Concordia University, Montreal
*
Email: Pablo.Gilabert@concordia.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article offers an account of human dignity based on a discussion of Kant’s moral and political philosophy and then shows its relevance for articulating and developing in a fresh way some normative dimensions of Marx’s critique of capitalism as involving exploitation, domination and alienation, and the view of socialism as involving a combination of freedom and solidarity. What is advanced here is not Kant’s own conception of dignity, but an account that partly builds on that conception and partly criticizes it. The same is the case with the account of socialism in relation to Marx’s work. As articulated, Kantian dignity and Marxian socialism turn out to be quite appealing and mutually supportive.

Keywords

KantMarxdignitysocialismexploitationdominationalienationabilities/needs principle
Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 22 , Special Issue 4: Special Issue on Kant and Marx , December 2017 , pp. 553 - 577
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cohen, Gerald (1988) History, Labour, and Freedom . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Gerald (2011) On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon (1986) An Introduction to Karl Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geras, Norman (1985) ‘The Controversy about Marx and Justice’. New Left Review, 1/150, 47–85.Google Scholar
Gilabert, Pablo (2010) ‘Kant and the Claims of the Poor’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81, 382–418.Google Scholar
Gilabert, Pablo (2015) ‘The Socialist Principle “From Each According To Their Abilities, To Each According To Their Needs”’. Journal of Social Philosophy, 46, 197–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, Pablo (forthcoming) Human Dignity and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert (1987) ‘Exploiting a Situation and Exploiting a Person’. In A. Reeve (ed.) Modern Theories of Exploitation (London: Sage), pp. 166–200.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2014) Kant, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996a) Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996b) Religion and Rational Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Love, Suzanne (2017) ‘Kant after Marx’. Kantian Review, (22)4.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1973) Grundrisse. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1978) The Marx-Engels Reader. Ed. R. Tucker, 2nd edn. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1990) Capital I. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1991) Capital III. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1992) Early Writings. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek (2011) On What Matters, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur (2009) Force and Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wolff, Jonathan (2002) Why Read Marx Today? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (1999) Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2004) Karl Marx. 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2008) Kantian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Erik (2010) Envisioning Real Utopias. London: Verso.Google Scholar