Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:54:49.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Moral Value of Artistic Beauty in Kant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2011

Joseph Cannon
Joseph Cannon*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
*
Email: ftinder@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the third Critique, Kant argues that it is “always the mark of a good soul” to take an immediate interest in natural beauty, because it indicates an interest in harmony between nature and moral freedom. He, however, denies that there can be a similarly significant interest in artistic beauty. I argue that Kant ought not to deny this value to artistic beauty because his account of fine art as the joint product of the “natural gift” of genius and the discipline of taste commits him to the claim that artistic beauty expresses such a harmony between nature and freedom.

Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , 08 March 2011 , pp. 113 - 126
Copyright
copyright © Kantian Review 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberti, Leon Battista (1972) On Painting, trans. Cecil Grayson. New York: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick (2009) Diotima's Children. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frierson, Patrick (2005) ‘Kant's Empirical Account of Human Action’. Philosopher's Imprint, 5/7, 1–34.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1993) Kant and the Experience of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1902– ), Kants gesammelten Schriften, ed. Königlich Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996a) Practical Philosophy, trans. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996b) Religion and Rational Theology, trans. Allen Wood and George di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2000) Critique of the Power of Judgment, trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2007) Anthropology, History and Education, ed. Robert Louden and Günter Zöller. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold (2005) Laocöon: An Essay upon the Limits of Painting and Poetry, trans. Ellen Frothingham. Mineola, NY: Dover Press.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses (1997) Philosophical Writings, trans. Daniel Dahlstrom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munzel, G. Felicitas (1999) Kant's Conception of Moral Character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Quarfood, Marcel (2004) Transcendental Idealism and the Organism. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Sloan, Philip (2002) ‘Preforming the Categories: Eighteenth-Century Generation Theory and the Biological Roots of Kant's A Priori’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 40, 229–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winckelmann, Johann (1987) Reflections on the Imitation of Greek Works in Painting and Sculpture, trans. Elfredie Heyer and Roger Norton. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Winckelmann, Johann (2002) ‘Erinnerung über die Betrachtung der Werke der Kunst’. In Kleine Schriften, Vorreden, Entwürfe, ed. Walther Rehm. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar