Article contents
Patriotism, Peace and Poverty: Reply to Bernstein and Varden
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 May 2014
Abstract
In this essay I reply to Alyssa Bernstein and Helga Varden's comments on my book, Kant and Cosmopolitanism. In response to Bernstein, I argue that Kant's opposition to the coercive incorporation of states into an international federation should be interpreted as permitting no exceptions. In response to Varden, I clarify Kant's conception and defence of patriotism as a duty, and I show how Kantian cosmopolitans can rebut Bernard Williams's ‘one-thought-too-many’ objection. I also explicate why, given a specific feature of Kant's defence of the state's duty to provide poverty relief, an international federation can be seen to have an analogous duty.
Keywords
- Type
- Critical Exchange
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Kantian Review 2014
References
- 3
- Cited by