Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:46:44.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reinventing Kant?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2022

Jameliah Inga Shorter-Bourhanou
Jameliah Inga Shorter-Bourhanou*
Affiliation:
College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, MA, USA
*
Email: jshorter@holycross.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Immanuel Kant is often interpreted as a universal egalitarian who claims that all people, regardless of their differences, are equal. This view has been challenged by several scholars including Charles Mills and Robert Bernasconi, who note the persistent racist underpinning in Kant’s work; however, the standard reading is that Kant changed his mind about race and eventually reaffirmed his universalism. By considering Charles Mills’ notion of ‘Black Radical Kantianism’, as a way of reinventing Kant, I argue that continued engagement with Kant’s universalism must go hand in hand with recognizing his racism in order to make it truly inclusive.

Keywords

KantCharles MillsKant and raceKant and racism
Type
Article
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 27 , Special Issue 4: Special Issue: Radicalizing Kant? , December 2022 , pp. 529 - 540
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baron, M. (1997) ‘Kantian Ethics and Claims of Detachment’. In Schott, R. (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Immanuel Kant (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press), 145–70.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, R. (2001) ‘Who Invented the Concept of Race? Kant’s Role in the Enlightenment Construction of Race’. In Bernasconi, R. (ed.), Race (Malden, MA: Blackwell), 11–36.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, R. (2018) ‘Ottobah Cugoano’s Place in the History of Philosophy: Slavery and the Philosophical Canon’. In Hull, G. (ed.), Debating African Philosophy: Perspectives on Identity, Decolonial Ethics and Comparative Philosophy (New York: Routledge), 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, L. (2014) ‘Moral Goodness and Human Equality in Kant’s Ethical Theory’. In Altman, M. C. (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism (London: Palgrave Macmillan), 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farr, A. (2002) ‘Can a Philosophy of Race Afford to Abandon the Kantian Categorical Imperative?’. Journal of Social Philosophy, 33, 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, T., and Boxill, B. (2001) ‘Kant and Race’. In Boxill, B. (ed.), Race and Racism (New York: Oxford University Press), 448–71.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, P. (2007) ‘Kant’s Second Thoughts on Race’. Philosophical Quarterly, 57, 573–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louden, R. (2011) Kant’s Human Being: Essays on his Theory of Human Nature. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, C. (1997) The Racial Contract. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, C. (2005) ‘Kant’s Untermenschen ’. In Valls, Andrew (ed.), Race and Racism in Modern Philosophy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), 169–93.Google Scholar
Mills, C. (2018) ‘Black Radical Kantianism’. Res Philosophica, 95, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthu, S. (2003) Enlightenment Against Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Park, P. (2013) Africa, Asia, and the History of Philosophy: Racism and the Formation of the Philosophical Canon 1780–1830. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Shell, S. (2006) ‘Kant’s Conception of a Human Race’. In Eigen, Sara and Larrimore, Mark (eds), The German Invention of Race (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press), 55–72.Google Scholar
Shorter-Bourhanou, J. (2017) ‘Legitimizing Blacks in Philosophy’. Journal of World Philosophies, 2, 27–36.Google Scholar
Wood, A. (2008) Kantian Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar