Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:04:41.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Schopenhauer's Transformation of the Kantian Sublime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2012

Sandra Shapshay*
Affiliation:
Indiana University

Abstract

Schopenhauer singles out Kant's theory of the sublime for high praise, calling it ‘by far the most excellent thing in the Critique of Aesthetic Judgement’, yet, in his main discussion of the sublime, he ridicules Kant's explanation as being in the grip of scholastic metaphysics. My first aim in this paper is to sort out Schopenhauer's apparently conflicted appraisal of Kant's theory of the sublime. Next, based on his Nachlaß, close readings of published texts and especially of his account of the experience of tragic drama, I offer a reconstruction of Schopenhauer's theory of the sublime which understands it – against prevailing scholarly views – as a transformation of rather than as a real departure from the Kantian explanation. Finally, I suggest that my interpretation of Schopenhauer's theory of the sublime has far-reaching consequences for a proper understanding of his views on freedom.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abaci, Uygar (2008) ‘Kant's Justified Dismissal of Artistic Sublimity’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 66, 237251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry (2001) Kant's Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Emily (forthcoming) ‘Reassessing Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature in the Kantian Sublime’. Journal of Aesthetic Education.Google Scholar
Crowther, Paul (1989) The Kantian Sublime: From Morality to Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1996a) Kant and the Experience of Freedom: Essays on Aesthetics and Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1996b) ‘Pleasure and Knowledge in Schopenhauer's Aesthetics’. In Jacquette (1996b: 109–32).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1997) Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2008) ‘Back to Truth: Knowledge and Pleasure in the Aesthetics of Schopenhauer’. European Journal of Philosophy, 16, 164178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamlyn, David (1980) Schopenhauer. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Jacquette, Dale (1996a) ‘Schopenhauer's Metaphysics of Appearance and Will in the Philosophy of Art’. In Jacquette (1996b: 1–36).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquette, Dale (ed.) (1996b) Schopenhauer, Philosophy, and the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janaway, Christopher (1996) ‘Knowledge and Tranquility: Schopenhauer on the Value of Art’. In Jacquette (1996b: 39–61).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel [1790] (2000) Critique of the Power of Judgment, ed. Paul Guyer, trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magee, Bryan (1997) The Philosophy of Schopenhauer, rev. edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Joseph (1885–92) Meyers Konversations-Lexikon, 4th edn. Leipzig and Vienna: Autorenkollektiv, Verlag des Bibliographischen Instituts.Google Scholar
Neill, Alex (2003) ‘Schopenhauer on Tragedy and Value’. In José Luis Bermúdez and Sebastian Gardner (eds), Art and Morality (New York: Routledge), 204217.Google Scholar
Neill, Alex (2008) ‘Aesthetic Experience in Schopenhauer's Metaphysics of Will’. European Journal of Philosophy, 16, 179193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neill, Alex (2012) ‘Schopenhauer on Tragedy and the Sublime’. In Bart Vandenabeele (ed.), A Companion to Schopenhauer (Oxford: Blackwell), 206218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neill, AlexShapshay, Sandy (2012) ‘Moral and Aesthetic. Freedom in Schopenhauer's Metaphysics’. Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus/International Yearbook of German Idealism.Google Scholar
Novembre, Alessandro (forthcoming) ‘Schopenhauers Verständnis der Fichte'schen “absoluten Besonnenheit” ’. Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch, 92.Google Scholar
Pillow, Kirk (2000) Sublime Understanding: Aesthetic Reflection in Kant and Hegel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rind, Miles (2000) ‘What is Claimed in a Kantian Judgment of Taste’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 38, 6385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, Kenneth (1982) ‘The Meaning of Universal Validity in Kant's Aesthetics’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 40, 301308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (1911–41) Arthur Schopenhauers Sämtliche Werke, ed. Paul Deussen. Munich: Piper Verlag.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur [1813] (1997) Schopenhauer's Early Fourfold Root: Translation and Commentary, trans F. C. White. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur [1841] (1999) Prize Essay on the Freedom of the Will, ed. Günter Zöller, trans. E. F. J. Payne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur [1859] (1966) The World as Will and Representation 3rd edn, trans. E. F. J. Payne, 2 vols. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (1966–75) Der handschriftliche Nachlaß, ed. Arthur Hübscher, 5 vols. Frankfurt/M.: Waldemar Kramer.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (1988) Manuscript Remains in Four Volumes, ed. Arthur Hübscher, trans. E. F. J. Payne. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Shapshay, Sandra (2012) ‘The Problem with the Problem of Tragedy: Schopenhauer's Solution Revisited’. British Journal of Aesthetics, 52, 1732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenabeele, Bart (2003) ‘Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, and the Aesthetically Sublime’. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 37, 90106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenabeele, Bart (2008) ‘Schopenhauer on Aesthetic Understanding and the Values of Art’. European Journal of Philosophy, 16, 194210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, Robert (1995) ‘Kant on Fine Art: Artistic Sublimity Shaped by Beauty’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 53, 189193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Julian (1987) Willing and Unwilling: A Study in the Philosophy of Schopenhauer. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Julian (1992) Nietzsche's Philosophy of Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel (2003) ‘Awe or Envy: Herder contra Kant on the Sublime’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 61, 217232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar