Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:59:51.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards a Kantian Theory of International Distributive Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2011

Howard Williams
Howard Williams
Affiliation:
Aberystwyth University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article examines where Kant stands on the question of the redistribution of wealth and income both nationally and globally. Kant is rightly seen as a radical reformer of the world order from a political standpoint seeking a republican, federative worldwide system; can he also be seen as wanting to bring about an equally dramatic shift from an economic perspective? To answer this question we have first of all to address the question of whether he is an egalitarian or an inegalitarian at the national level. Certainly there are certain social and material inequalities within a civil society Kant is prepared to accept and there are some he is not. This would imply that he would affirm certain inequalities at an international level and that there are others upon which he would recommend action. Thus the question arises as to whether or not it is appropriate for Kantians to regard the current enormous inequalities in wealth and income between individuals living in different parts of the globe as scandalous and in need of change. The paper throughout relates the problem of distributive justice within the state to the problem of distributive justice amongst states, arguing that this approach is warranted by Kant's own method. Particular attention is paid to how Kant's own approach to political philosophy may be deployed to underpin a change to a distinctive type of international distributive justice.

Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , July 2010 , pp. 43 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Kantian Review 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Byrd, R. S. (2006) ‘State as a moral person’, in Robinson, H. (ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press), I, reprinted in R. S. Byrd and J. Hruschka (eds), Kant and Law (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Holtman, S. W. (2004) ‘Kantian justice and poverty relief’, Kant-Studien, 95 (1): 86–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, A. (1999) Welfare in the Kantian State (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kersting, W. (1992) ‘Politics, freedom and order: Kant's political philosophy’, in Guyer, P. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
LeBar, M. (1999) ‘Kant on welfare’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 29: 225–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loriaux, S. (2007) ‘Kant on international distributive justice’, Journal of Global Ethics, 3 (3): 281–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loriaux, S. (2008) ‘Global equality of opportunity – a proposal’, Journal of International Relations and Development, 11: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, O. (1986) Faces of Hunger (London: Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999) The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Ripstein, A. (2009) Force and Freedom (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. (1997) The Social Contract and other later political writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Shaw, B. J. (2005) ‘Rawls, Kant's doctrine of right, and global distributive justice’, Journal of Politics, 67 (1): 220–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, H. (2003) Kant's Critique of Hobbes (Cardiff: University of Wales Press).Google Scholar
Wood, A. (2007) Kantian Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar