Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T10:00:08.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development of a graphical user interface, functional elements and classifiers for the non-invasive characterization of childhood brain tumours using magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2011

Alexander Gibb ,
John Easton ,
Nigel Davies ,
YU Sun ,
Lesley MacPherson ,
Kal Natarajan ,
Theodoros Arvanitis  and
Andrew Peet
Alexander Gibb
Affiliation:
School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
John Easton
Affiliation:
School of Electronic, Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; e-mail: t.arvanitis@bham.ac.uk
Nigel Davies
Affiliation:
School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
YU Sun
Affiliation:
School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
Lesley MacPherson
Affiliation:
Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
Kal Natarajan
Affiliation:
School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
Theodoros Arvanitis*
Affiliation:
Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK School of Electronic, Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; e-mail: t.arvanitis@bham.ac.uk
Andrew Peet
Affiliation:
School of Cancer Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a non-invasive method, which can provide diagnostic information on children with brain tumours. The technique has not been widely used in clinical practice, partly because of the difficulty of developing robust classifiers from small patient numbers and the challenge of providing decision support systems (DSSs) acceptable to clinicians. This paper describes a participatory design approach in the development of an interactive clinical user interface, as part of a distributed DSS for the diagnosis and prognosis of brain tumours. In particular, we consider the clinical need and context of developing interactive elements for an interface that facilitates the classification of childhood brain tumours, for diagnostic purposes, as part of the HealthAgents European Union project. Previous MRS-based DSS tools have required little input from the clinician user and a raw spectrum is essentially processed to provide a diagnosis sometimes with an estimate of error. In childhood brain tumour diagnosis where there are small numbers of cases and a large number of potential diagnoses, this approach becomes intractable. The involvement of clinicians directly in the designing of the DSS for brain tumour diagnosis from MRS led to an alternative approach with the creation of a flexible DSS that, allows the clinician to input prior information to create the most relevant differential diagnosis for the DSS. This approach mirrors that which is currently taken by clinicians and removes many sources of potential error. The validity of this strategy was confirmed for a small cohort of children with cerebellar tumours by combining two diagnostic types, pilocytic astrocytomas (11 cases) and ependymomas (four cases) into a class of glial tumours which then had similar numbers to the other diagnostic type, medulloblastomas (18 cases). Principal component analysis followed by linear discriminant analysis on magnetic resonance spectral data gave a classification accuracy of 91% for a three-class classifier and 94% for a two-class classifier using a leave-one-out analysis. This DSS provides a flexible method for the clinician to use MRS for brain tumour diagnosis in children.

Type
Articles
Information
The Knowledge Engineering Review , Volume 26 , Special Issue 3: Computational Intelligence for Neuro-Oncological Diagnosis , 28 July 2011 , pp. 353 - 363
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, T., Cohen, M., Weinberg, J., Gilbert, M. 2004. Imaging techniques in neuro-oncology. Seminars in Oncology Nursing 20(4), 231–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barahona, P., Christensen, J. (eds) 1994. Knowledge and Decisions in Health Telematics – The Next Decade, chapter Question the Assumptions. IOS Press, 61–62.Google Scholar
Barkovich, A., Moore, K., Grant, E., Jones, B. 2007. Diagnostic Imaging: Pediatric Neuroradiology. Amisys.Google Scholar
Barnett, G. (ed.) 2007. High-grade Gliomas: Diagnosis and Treatment. In Pediatric High-Grade Glioma. Humana Press Inc., 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyes, N., Eberholst, F., Farliec, R., Sørensend, L., Lynge, K. 2007. User driven, evidence based experimental design; a new method for interface design used to develop an interface for clinical overview of patient records. Medinfo 12, 1053–1057.Google Scholar
CCLG. 2009. Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group. http://www.cclg.org.ukGoogle Scholar
Dredger, M., Kothari, A., Morrison, J., Sawada, M., Crighton, E., Graham, I. 2007. Using participatory design to develop (public) health decision support systems through GIS. International Journal of Health Geographics 6, 53. doi:10.1186/1476-072X-6-53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
González-Vélez, H., Mier, M., Julià-Sapé, M., Arvanitis, T., García-Gómez, J., Robles, M., Lewis, P., Dasmahapatra, S., Dupplaw, D., Peet, A., Arús, C., Celda, B., Van Huffel, S., Lluch-Ariet, M. 2009. HealthAgents: distributed multi-agent brain tumor diagnosis and prognosis. Applied Intelligence 30(3), 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haque, S., Mital, D., Srinivasan, S. 2002. Advances in biomedical informatics for the management of cancer. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 980, 287–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howe, F., Opstad, K. 2003. 1H MR spectroscopy of brain tumours and masses. NMR in Biomedicine 16, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, B., Croitoru, M., Roset, R., Dupplaw, D., Lurigi, M., Dasmahapatra, S., Lewis, P., Martínez-Miranda, J., Sáez, C. (2011). The HealthAgents ontology: how to represent the knowledge behind a brain tumour distributed decision system. Knowledge Engineering Review 26, 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, P., Prys-Roberts, C. (eds) 1994. Monitoring in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. In Automated Signal Interpretation. Baillière Tindall, 32–42.Google Scholar
Louis, D., Ohgaki, H., Wiestler, O., Cavenee, W., Burger, P., Jouvet, A., Scheithauer, B., Kleihues, P. 2007. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathologica 114(2), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luts, J., Heerschap, A., Suykens, J., Van Huffel, S. 2007. A combined MRI and MRSI based multiclass system for brain tumour recognition using LS-SVMs with class probabilities and feature selection. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 40(2), 87–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magnusson, P., Matthing, J., Kristensson, P. 2003. Managing user involvement in service innovation: experiments with innovating end users. Journal of Service Research 6(2), 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherji, S. (ed.) 1998. Clinical Applications of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Nelson, S., Vigneron, D., Dillon, W. 1999. Serial evaluation of patients with brain tumours using volume MRI and 3D 1H MRSI. NMR in Biomedicine 12, 123–138.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Packer, R. 1999. Brain tumours in children. Archives of Neurology 56, 421–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pizzo, P., Poplack, D. (eds) 2002. Principles and Practice of Paediatric Oncology, 4th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, S., Tomayo, P., Gaasenbeek, M., Sturla, L., Angelo, M., McLaughlin, M., Kim, J., Goumnervoa, L., Black, P., Lau, C., Allen, J., Zagzag, D., Olsson, J., Curran, T., Wetmore, C., Biegel, J., Poggio, T., Muckherjee, S., Rifkin, R., Califano, A., Stolovitzky, G., Louis, D., Mesirov, J., Lander, E., Golub, T. 2000. Prediction of central nervous system embryonal tumour outcome based on gene expression. Nature 415, 436–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preul, M., Caramanos, Z., Collins, D., Villemure, J., Leblanc, R., Oliver, A., Pokrupa, R., Arnold, D. 1996. Accurate, non-invasive diagnosis of human brain tumours by using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Nature Medicine 2, 323–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preul, M., Caramanos, Z., Leblanc, R., Villemure, J., Arnold, D. 1998. Using pattern analysis of in vivo proton MRSI data to improve the diagnosis and surgical management of patients with brain tumours. NMR in Biomedicine 1, 192–200.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuler, D., Namioka, A. 1993. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Sharma, M., Mansur, D., Reifenburger, G., Perry, A., Leonard, J., Aldape, K., Albin, M., Emnett, R., Loeser, S., Watson, M., Nagarajan, R., Gutmann, D. 2007. Distinct genetic signatures among pilocytic astrocytomas relate to their brain region origin. Cancer Research 67, 890–900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharp, H., Rogers, Y., Preece, J. 2007. Interaction Design: Beyond Human–Computer Interaction. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Shneiderman, B. 2003. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human–Computer Interaction. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Shortliffe, E. 1987. Computer programs to support clinical decision making. Journal of the American Medical Association 258, 61–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tate, A., Majós, C., Moreno, A., Howe, F., Griffiths, J., Arús, C. 2003. Automated classification of short echo time in in vivo 1H brain tumor spectra: a multicenter study. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 49(1), 29–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tate, A., Underwood, J., Acosta, D., Julia-Sape, M., Majos, C., Moreno-Torres, A., Howe, F., van der Graaf, M., Lefournier, V., Murphy, M., Loosemore, A., Ladroue, C., Wesseling, P., Bosson, J. L., Cabanas, M., Simonetti, A., Gajewicz, W., Calvar, J., Capdevilla, A., Wilkins, P., Bell, B., Remy, C., Heerschap, A., Watson, D., Griffiths, J., Arus, C. 2006. Development of a decision support system for diagnosis and grading of brain tumours using in vivo magnetic resonance single voxel spectra. NMR in Biomedicine 19, 411–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, M., Poppleton, H., Fuller, C., Su, X., Liu, Y., Jensen, P., Magdaleno, S., Dalton, J., Calabrese, C., Board, J. 2005. Radial glia cells are candidate stem cells of ependymoma. Cancer Cell 8, 323–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The HealthAgents Consortium. 2009. HealthAgents. http://www.healthagents.netGoogle Scholar
Underwood, J., Tate, A., Luckin, R., Majós, C., Capdevila, A., Howe, F., Griffiths, J., Arús, C. 2001. A prototype decision support system for MR spectroscopy-assisted diagnosis of brain tumours. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 84(1), 561–565.Google ScholarPubMed