Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T14:56:50.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ontology-driven word recommendation for mobile Web search

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2014

Daniel Aréchiga ,
Fabio Crestani  and
Jesús Vegas
Daniel Aréchiga
Affiliation:
Southern Universitary Center, University of Guadalajara, Av. Enrique Arreola Silva 883, Ciudad Guzmán, Jalisco, CP 49000, México; e-mail: vdaniel@cusur.udg.mx
Fabio Crestani
Affiliation:
Faculty of Informatics, University of Lugano, Stabile Informatica, Via Buffi 13, 6904Lugano, Switzerland; e-mail: fabio.crestani@lu.unisi.ch
Jesús Vegas
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, University of Valladolid, Camino al Cementerio s/n, 47011 Valladolid, Spain; e-mail: jvegas@infor.uva.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Web search has special characteristics against the desktop search when realized from mobile devices. To establish an improvement within this paradigm, an option is to take into account the context from which the search is developed. To conceptualize the mobile context, we propose the use of ontologies, which will include the device characteristics, environmental conditions and user preferences, among other term conceptualizations. This context definition would be used to determinate the behavior of a word recommendation when searching from mobile devices. As an essential process of creating this context ontology, we have made a real user's evaluation of the ontology terms by means of a survey. This paper shows a brief introduction to the project and focuses mainly on the results obtained in this concept's evaluation.

Type
Articles
Information
The Knowledge Engineering Review , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , March 2014 , pp. 186 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arias, M., Cantera, J. M., Vegas, J., de la Fuente, P., Alonso, J. C., Bernardo, G. G., Llamas, C., Zubizarreta, A. 2008. Context-based personalization for mobile web search. In PersDB, Auckland, New Zealand, 33–39.Google Scholar
Brank, J., Grobelnik, M., Mladenic, D. 2005. A survey of ontology evaluation techniques. In Proceedings of the Conference on Data Mining and Data Warehouses SiKDD, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Brewster, C., Alani, H., Dasmahapatra, S., Wilks, Y. 2004. Data driven ontology evaluation. In Proceedings of International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
Chen, H., Finin, T., Joshi, A. 2003. An ontology for context-aware pervasive computing environments. Knowledge Engineering Review 18(3), 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauch, S., Chaffee, J., Pretschner, A. 2003. Ontology-based personalized search and browsing. Web Intelligence and Agent Systems 1(3), 219–234.Google Scholar
Gómez-Pérez, A. 1995. Some ideas and examples to evaluate ontologies. In CAIA ‘95: Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications, Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society, 299.Google Scholar
Gómez-Pérez, A. 2001. Evaluation of ontologies. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 16(3), 391–409.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guarino, N., Welty, C. 2002. Evaluating ontological decisions with ontoclean. Communications of the ACM 45(2), 61–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guarino, N., Welty, C. 2004. An overview of ontoclean. In Handbook on Ontologies, Springer Verlag, Germany, 151–159.Google Scholar
Jeon, H., Kim, T., Choi, J. 2008. Mobile semantic search using personal preference filtering. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Networked Computing and Advanced Information Management, NCM ‘08, Kim, J., Delen, D., Park, J., Ko, F. & Na, Y. J. (eds). Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society, 531–534.Google Scholar
Kamvar, M., Baluja, S. 2008. Query suggestions for mobile search: understanding usage patterns. In CHI 2008: Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in omputing systems, Burnett, M. & Costabile, M. F. (eds). New York, NY, USA. ACM, 1013–1016.Google Scholar
Khushraj, D., Lassila, O. 2005. Ontological approach to generating personalized user interfaces for web services. In The Semantic Web—ISWC 2005, Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V. R. & Musen, M. A. (eds). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 916–927.Google Scholar
Leung, K. W.-T., Lee, D. L., Lee, W.-C. 2010. Personalized web search with location preferences. In Proceedings of ICDE, 701–712.Google Scholar
Maedche, A., Staab, S. 2002. Measuring similarity between ontologies. In EKAW ‘02: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Ontologies and the Semantic Web, Gómez-Pérez, A. & Benjamins, V. R. (eds). London, UK. Springer-Verlag, 251–263.Google Scholar
Noy, N. F., Mcguinness, D. 2000. Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology. Stanford KSL Technical Report KSL-01-05.Google Scholar
Pretschner, A., Gauch, S. 1999. Ontology based personalized search. In ICTAI ‘99: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society, 391.Google Scholar
Rios, D., Costa, P. D., Pires, L. F., Gonçalves, J., Filho, P., van Sinderen, M. 2003. Using ontologies for modeling context-aware service platforms. In OOPSLA 2003 Workshop on Ontologies to Complement Software Architectures, Anaheim, Crocker, R. & Steele, G. L. Jr. (eds). CA, USA, 26–30.Google Scholar
Sieg, A., Mobasher, B., Burke, R. 2007. Ontological user profiles for representing context in web search. In WI-IATW 2007: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology—Workshops, Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society, 91–94.Google Scholar
Staab, S., Sure, Y., Gomez-Pérez, A., Daelemans, W., Reinberger, M.-L., Guarino, N., Noy, N. F. 2004. Why evaluate ontology technologies? Because it works!. IEEE Intelligent Systems 19(4), 74–81.Google Scholar
Villalonga, C., Strohbach, M., Snoeck, N., Sutterer, M., Belaunde, M., Kovacs, E., Zhdanova, A. V., Goix, L. W., Droegehorn, O. 2009. Mobile ontology: towards a standardized semantic model for the mobile domain. Springer-Verlag, 248–257.Google Scholar
Weißenberg, N., Voisard, A., Gartmann, R. 2004. Using ontologies in personalized mobile applications. In GIS 2004: Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM International Workshop on Geographic Information Systems, Cruz, I. F. & Pfoser, D. (eds). New York, NY, USA. ACM, 2–11.Google Scholar