Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:45:57.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An overview of the phrase-based statistical machine translation techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2012

Marta Ruiz Costa-jussà
Marta Ruiz Costa-jussà*
Affiliation:
Barcelona Media Innovation Center, Avenida Diagonal 177, 9th floor, 08018 Barcelona, Spain; e-mail: marta.ruiz@barcelonamedia.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This work provides a general overview of the statistical machine translation (SMT) scientific field, which is a subfield of machine translation (MT). Specifically, this paper focuses on one of the most popular SMT approaches, that is, the phrase-based system.

The phrase-based translation units are typically extracted using statistical criteria, and they are weighted using different models. These models are log-linearly combined in the decoding, which is in charge of choosing the most probable translation. Significant quality improvements have been produced from original phrase-based SMT systems. Among others, the main challenges are reordering, domain adaptation and evaluation.

Type
Articles
Information
The Knowledge Engineering Review , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 413 - 431
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, D., Balkan, L. 1995. Machine translation: an introductory guide. Computational Linguistics 210(4), 577–578.Google Scholar
Axelrod, A. E. 2006. Factored Language Models for Statistical Machine Translation. Master Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Bangalore, S., Bordel, G., Riccardi, G. 2001. Computing consensus translation from multiple machine translation systems, In IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, Madonna di Campiglio, Italy, 351–354.Google Scholar
Barrachina, S., Bender, O., Casacuberta, F., Civera, J., Cubel, E., Khadivi, S., Lagarda, A., Ney, H., Toms, J., Vidal, E. 2009. Statistical approaches to computer-assisted translation. Computational Linguistics 350(1), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, A., Della Pietra, S., Della Pietra, V. 1996. A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Computational Linguistics 220(1), 39–72.Google Scholar
Bertoldi, N. 2006. Minimum Error Training (Updates). Technical report, Slides of the JHU Summer Workshop.Google Scholar
Bertoldi, N., Federico, M. 2009. Domain adaptation for statistical machine translation with monolingual resources. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Athens, Greece, 182–189. Association for Computational Linguistics. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W/W09/W09-0432.Google Scholar
Bertoldi, N., Cattoni, R., Cettolo, M., Chen, B., Federico, M. 2006. ITC-irst at the 2006 TC-STAR SLT evaluation campaign. In TC-STAR Workshop on Speech-to-Speech Translation, Barcelona, Spain, 19–24.Google Scholar
Brown, P., Della Pietra, S., Della Pietra, V., Mercer, R. 1993. The mathematics of statistical machine translation. Computational Linguistics 190(2), 263–311.Google Scholar
Bulyko, I., Matsourkas, S., Schwartz, R., Nguyen, L., Makhoul, J. 2007. Language model adaptation in machine translation from speech. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Honolulu, Hawai'i, 117–120.Google Scholar
Callison-Burch, C., Talbot, D., Osborne, M. 2004. Statistical machine translation with word- and sentence-aligned parallel corpora. In Proceedings of the 42th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain, 175–182.Google Scholar
Callison-Burch, C., Fordyce, C., Koehn, P., Monz, C., Schroeder, J. 2007. (Meta-)evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Prague, Czech Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics, 136–158. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W/W07/W07-0218.Google Scholar
Callison-Burch, C., Koehn, P., Monz, C., Schroeder, J. 2008. Further meta-evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Columbus, OH. Association for Computational Linguistics, 70–106. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W/W08/W08-0309.Google Scholar
Callison-Burch, C., Koehn, P., Monz, C., Schroeder, J. 2009. Findings of the 2009 Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Athens, Greece. Association for Computational Linguistics, 1–28. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W/W09/W09-0x01.Google Scholar
Carpuat, M., Wu, D. 2007. Improving statistical machine translation using word sense disambiguation. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Prague, 61–72.Google Scholar
Chen, S. F., Goodman, J. T. 1998. An Empirical Study of Smoothing Techniques for Language Modeling. Technical report, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Chiang, D. 2007. Hierarchical phrase-based translation. Computational Linguistics 33(2), 201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Civera, J., Juan, A. 2007. Domain adaptation in statistical machine translation with mixture modelling. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Prague, Czech Republic, 177–180.Google Scholar
Collins, M., Koehn, P., Kucerová, I. 2005. Clause restructuring for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 43th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Michigan, 531–540.Google Scholar
Costa-jussà, M. R., Fonollosa, J. A. R. 2009a. An Ngram-based reordering model. Computer Speech & Language 230(3), 362–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa-jussà, M. R., Fonollosa, J. A. R. 2009b. State-of-the-art word reordering approaches in statistical machine translation. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems 920(11), 2179–2185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa-jussà, M. R., Crego, J. M., de Gispert, A., Lambert, P., Khalilov, M., Mariño, J. B., Fonollosa, J. A. R., Banchs, R. 2006. TALP phrase-based statistical translation system for European language pairs. In Human Language Technology Conference (HLT-NAACL'06): Proceedings of the Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, New York City, 142–145.Google Scholar
Costa-jussà, M. R., Fonollosa, J. A. R., Monte, E. 2011. Recursive alignment block classification technique for word reordering in statistical machine translation. Language Resources and Evaluation Journal 450(2), 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crego, J. M. 2008. Architecture and Modeling for N-gram-based Statistical Machine Translation. PhD thesis, Department of Signal Theory and Communications, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC).Google Scholar
Crego, J. M., Mariño, J. B. 2007. Improving SMT by coupling reordering and decoding. Machine Translation 200(3), 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crego, J. M., Yvon, F. 2009. Gappy translation units under left-to-right SMT decoding. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation (EAMT'09), Barcelona.Google Scholar
Crego, J. M., de Gispert, A., Lambert, P., Costa-jussà, M. R., Khalilov, M., Banchs, R., Mariño, J. B., Fonollosa, J. A. R. 2006. N-gram-based SMT system enhanced with reordering patterns. In Human Language Technology Conference (HLT-NAACL'06): Proceedings of the Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, New York City, 162–165.Google Scholar
de Gispert, A., Marino, J. B. 2008. On the impact of morphology in English to Spanish statistical MT. Speech Communication 50, 1034–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeNero, J., Chiang, D., Knight, K. 2009. Fast consensus decoding over translation forests. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, Singapore, 567–575.Google Scholar
Doddington, G. 2002. Automatic evaluation of machine translation quality using n-gram co-occurrence statistics. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference, HLT-NAACL'02, San Diego, 138–145.Google Scholar
Doi, T., Hwang, Y., Imamura, K., Okuma, H., Sumita, E. 2005. Nobody is perfect: ATR's hybrid approach to spoken language translation. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Spoken Language Translation, IWSLT'04, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 55–62.Google Scholar
Dorr, B. J. 1994. Machine translation: a view from the lexicon. Computational Linguistics 200(4), 670–676.Google Scholar
Eck, M., Vogel, S., Waibel, A. 2004. Language model adaptation for statistical machine translation based on information retrieval. In Proceedings of the LREC, Lisbon, Portugal, 327–330.Google Scholar
Farrús, M., Costa-jussà, M. R., Mariño, J. B., Fonollosa, J. A. R. 2010. Linguistic-based evaluation criteria to identify statistical machine translation errors. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the EAMT: European Association for Machine Translation, Saint Rapahel.Google Scholar
Finch, A., Sumita, E. 2008. Dynamic model interpolation for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Colombus, USA, 208–215.Google Scholar
Fiscus, G. 1997. A post-processing system to yield reduced word error rates: recognizer output voting error reduction (ROVER). In IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, Santa Barbara, USA.Google Scholar
Flanagan, M. A. 1994. Error classification for MT evaluation. In Proceedings of the AMTA, Columbia, 65–72.Google Scholar
Foster, G., Kuhn, R. 2007. Mixture-model adaptation for SMT. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Prague, Czech Republic, 128–135.Google Scholar
Fraser, A., Marcu, D. 2006. Measuring Word Alignment Quality for Statistical Machine Translation. Technical report, ISI/University of Southern California, California.Google Scholar
Frederking, R., Nirenburg, S. 1994. Three heads are better than one. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, Stuttgart, Germany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giménez, J., Màrquez, L. 2007. Linguistic features for automatic evaluation of heterogenous MT systems. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Prague, 256–264.Google Scholar
Haque, R., Kumar Naskar, S., Ma, Y., Way, A. 2009. Using supertags as source language context in SMT. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation (EAMT), Barcelona, 234–241.Google Scholar
Hasan, S., Ney, H. 2005. Clustered language models based on regular expressions for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of The European Association for Machine Translation (EAMT), Budapest, Hungary, 119–125.Google Scholar
Hassan, H., Hearne, M., Way, A., Sima'an, K. 2006. Syntactic phrase-based statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 1st IEEE/ACL Workshop on Spoken Language Technology, Aruba.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayaraman, S., Lavie, A. 2005. Multi-engline machine translation guided by explicit word matching. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation, Budapest, Hungary, 143–152.Google Scholar
Kanthak, S., Vilar, D., Matusov, E., Zens, R., Ney, H. 2005. Novel reordering approaches in phrase-based statistical machine translation. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Building and Using Parallel Texts: Data-Driven Machine Translation and Beyond (WMT), Ann Arbor, MI, 167–174.Google Scholar
Khalilov, M., Costa-jussà, M. R., Henríquez, C. A., Fonollosa, J. A. R., Hernández, A., Mariño, J. B., Banchs, R. E., Chen, B., Zhang, M., Aw, A., Li, H. 2008. The TALP & I2R SMT systems for IWSLT 2008. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Spoken Language Translation, Hawaii, USA, 116–123.Google Scholar
Khalilov, M., Fonollosa, J. A. R., Dras, M. 2009. A new subtree-transfer approach to syntax-based reordering for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation (EAMT'09), Barcelona, Spain, 198–204.Google Scholar
Knight, K., Al-Onaizan, Y. 1998. Translation with finite-state devices. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas, AMTA'02, Langhorne, 421–437.Google Scholar
Koehn, K., Knight, K. 2003. Empirical methods for compound splitting. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Budapest, Hungary, 347–354.Google Scholar
Koehn, P., Schroeder, J. 2007. Experiments in domain adaptation for statistical machine translation. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation (WMT), Prague, 224–227.Google Scholar
Koehn, P., Och, F. J., Marcu, D. 2003. Statistical phrase-based translation. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference, HLT-NAACL'03, Edmonton, Canada, 48–54.Google Scholar
Koehn, P., Amittai, A., Birch, A., Callison-Burch, C., Osborne, M., Talbot, D., White, M. 2005. Edinburgh system description for the 2005 IWSLT speech translation evaluation. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Spoken Languages Translation, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Koehn, P., Hoang, H., Birch, A., Callison-Burch, C., Federico, M., Bertoldi, N., Cowan, B., Shen, W., Moran, C., Zens, R., Dyer, C., Bojar, O., Constantin, A., Herbst, E. 2007. Moses: open source toolkit for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic, 177–180.Google Scholar
Kumar, S., Byrne, W. 2004. Minimum Bayes-risk decoding for statistical machine translation. In Proceeding of the Human Language Technology Conference, HLT-NAACL'04, Boston, MA, USA, 169–176.Google Scholar
Kumar, S., Macherey, W., Dyer, C., Och, F. 2009. Efficient minimum error rate training and minimum Bayes-risk decoding for translation hypergraphs and lattices. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, Singapore, 163–171.Google Scholar
Lambert, P. 2008. Exploiting Lexical Information and Discriminative Alignment Training in Statistical Machine Translation. PhD thesis, Software Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC).Google Scholar
Lambert, P., Banchs, R. E. 2006. Tuning machine translation parameters with SPSA. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Spoken Language Translation, Kyoto, Japan, 190–196.Google Scholar
Langlais, P., Gotti, F. 2006. Phrase-based SMT with shallow tree-phrases. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, New York, USA, 39–46.Google Scholar
Langlais, P., Patry, A. 2007. Translating unknown words by analogical learning. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL), Prague, Czech Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics, 877–886. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D/D07/D07-1092.Google Scholar
Lavie, A., Agarwal, A. 2007. METEOR: an automatic metric for MT evaluation with high levels of correlation with human judgments. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation (WMT), Prague, Czech Republic, 228–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, A. 2007. A Survey of Statistical Machine Translation. Storming Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, A. 2008. Machine Translation by Pattern Matching. PhD thesis, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Macherey, W., Och, F., Thayer, I., Uszkoreit, J. 2008. Lattice-based minimum error rate training for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Hawaii, 725–734.Google Scholar
Mariño, J. B., Banchs, R. E., Crego, J. M., de Gispert, A., Lambert, P., Fonollosa, J. A. R., Costa-jussà, M. R. 2006. N-gram based machine translation. Computational Linguistics 320(4), 527–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matusov, E., Zens, R., Vilar, D., Mauser, A., Popovic, M., Hasan, S., Ney, H. 2006. The RWTH machine translation system. In TC-STAR Workshop on Speech-to-Speech Translation, Barcelona, Spain, 31–36.Google Scholar
Matusov, E., Leusch, G., Banchs, R. E., Bertoldi, N., Dechelotte, D., Federico, M., Kolss, M., Lee, Y., Marino, J. B., Paulik, M., Roukos, S., Schwenk, H., Ney, H. 2008. System combination for machine translation of spoken and written language. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing 160(7), 1222–1237.Google Scholar
Mauser, A., Matusov, E., Ney, H. 2006. Training a statistical machine translation system without GIZA++. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC'06, Genova, 715–720.Google Scholar
McCowan, I., Moore, D., Dines, J., Gatica-Perez, D., Flynn, M., Wellner, P., Bourlard, H. 2004. On the use of information retrieval measures for speech recognition evaluation. In Proceedings of the IDIAP-RR 73, Martigny, Switzerland. IDIAP.Google Scholar
Menezes, A., Toutanova, K., Quirk, C. 2006. Microsoft research treelet translation system: NAACL 2006 Europarl evaluation. In Proceedings on the Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, New York City. Association for Computational Linguistics, 158–161.Google Scholar
Nelder, J. A., Mead, R. 1965. A simplex method for function minimization. The Computer Journal 7, 308–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nießen, S., Ney, H. 2001. Morpho-syntactic analysis for reordering in statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the MT-Summit VII, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 247–252.Google Scholar
Nomoto, T. 2004. Multi-engine machine translation with voted language model. In Proceedings of the 42th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain, 494–501.Google Scholar
Och, F. J. 1999. An efficient method for determining bilingual word classes. In Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Bergen, Norway, 71–76.Google Scholar
Och, F. J. 2002. Statistical Machine Translation: From Single-Word Models to Alignment Templates. PhD thesis, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.Google Scholar
Och, F. J. 2003. Minimum error rate training in statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 41th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sapporo, 160–167.Google Scholar
Och, F. J., Ney, H. 2000. A comparison of alignment models for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ, USA, 1086–1090.Google Scholar
Och, F. J., Ney, H. 2004. The alignment template approach to statistical machine translation. Computational Linguistics 300(4), 417–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Och, F.-J., Gildea, D., Khudanpur, S., Sarkar, A., Yamada, K., Fraser, A., Kumar, S., Shen, L., Smith, D., Eng, K., Jain, V., Jin, Z., Radev, D. 2004. A smorgasbord of features for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference, HLT-NAACL'04, 161–168.Google Scholar
Olive, J. 2005. Global autonomous language exploitation. DARPA/IPTOProposer Information Pamphlet.Google Scholar
Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., Zhu, W-J. 2002. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Philadelphia, PA, 311–318.Google Scholar
Popovic, M. 2009. Machine Translation:Statistical Approach with Additional Linguistic Knowledge. PhD thesis, RWTH University.Google Scholar
Popovic, M., Ney, H. 2006. POS-based word reorderings for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC'06, Genoa, Genoa, Italy, 1278–1283.Google Scholar
Popovic, M., Ney, H. 2009. Syntax-oriented evaluation measures for machine translation output. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, Athens, 29–32.Google Scholar
Przybocki, M., Sanders, G., Le, A. 2006. Edit distance: a metric for machine translation evaluation. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC'06, Genoa, Italy, 2038–2043.Google Scholar
Quirk, C., Menezes, A., Cherry, C. 2005. Dependency treelet translation: syntactically informed phrasal SMT. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'05), Ann Arbor, MI, 271–279.Google Scholar
Rogati, M. 2009. Domain Adaptation of Translation Models for Multilingual Applications. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
Rosti, A.-V.I., Ayan, N. F., Xiang, S. B., Schwartz Matsoukas, R., Dorr, B. J. 2007. Combining outputs from multiple machine translation systems. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference, HLT-NAACL'07, Rocherster, USA, 228–235.Google Scholar
Schwenk, H., Estève, Y. 2008. Data selection and smoothing in an open-source system for the 2008 NIST machine translation evaluation. In Proceedings of the Interspeech'08, Brisbane, Australia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwenk, H., Costa-jussà, M. R., Fonollosa, J. A. R. 2006. Continuous Space Language Models for the IWSLT 2006 Task. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Spoken Language Translation, Kyoto, Japan, 166–173.Google Scholar
Schwenk, H., Costa-jussa, M. R., Fonollosa, J. A. R. 2007. Smooth bilingual n-gram translation. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL), Prague, Czech Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics, 430–438. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D/D07/D07-1045.Google Scholar
Sim, K. C., Byrne, W. J., Gales, M. J. F., Sahbi, H., Woodland, P. C. 2007. Consensus network decoding for statistical machine translation system combination. In Proceedings of the ICASSP, 4, Rocherster, USA, 105–108.Google Scholar
Snover, M., Dorr, B., Schwartz, R., Micciulla, L., Makhoul, J. 2006. A study of translation edit rate with targeted human annotation. In Proceedings of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Snover, M., Dorr, B., Schwartz, R., Makhoul, J., Micciula, L., Weischedel, R. 2005. A Study of Translation Error Rate with Targeted Human Annotation. Technical report LAMP-TR-126,CS-TR-4755,UMIACS-TR-2005-58, University of Maryland, College Park and BBN Technologies.Google Scholar
Stroppa, N., van de Bosch, A., Way, A. 2007. Exploiting source similarity for SMT using context-informed features. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine TRanslation (TMI), Skövde, 231–240.Google Scholar
Tillmann, C. 2004. A unigram orientation model for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference, HLT-NAACL'04, Boston, 101–104.Google Scholar
Tillmann, C., Ney, H. 2003. Word reordering and a dynamic programming beam search algorithm for statistical machine translation. Computational Linguistics 290(1), 97–133.Google Scholar
Vilar, D., Stein, D., Zhang, Y., Matusov, E., Mauser, A., Bender, O., Mansour, S., Ney, H. 2008. The RWTH machine translation system for IWSLT 2008. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Spoken Language Translation, Waikiki, Hawaii, 108–115.Google Scholar
Vilar, D., Xu, J., Fernando-D'Haro, L., Ney, H. 2006. Error analysis of statistical machine translation output. In Proceedings of the LREC, Genoa, Italy.Google Scholar
Wang, C., Collins, M., Koehn, P. 2007. Chinese syntactic reordering for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL), Prague, 737–745.Google Scholar
Wu, D. 1996. A polynomial-time algorithm for statistical machine translation. In Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Santa Cruz.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, H., Wang, H., Zong, C. 2008. Domain adaptation for statistical machine translation with domain dictionary and monolingual corpora. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Beijing, China, 1, 993–1000.Google Scholar
Xia, F., McCord, M. 2004. Improving a statistical mt system with automatically learned rewrite patterns. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Morristown, 508.Google Scholar
Yamada, K., Knight, K. 2002. A decoder for syntax-based statistical MT. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 303–310.Google Scholar
Zens, R., Och, F. J., Ney, H. 2002. Phrase-based statistical machine translation. In KI-2002: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Jarke, M., Koehler, J. & Lakemeyer, G. (eds), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2479, 18–32. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Zens, R., Ney, H. 2007. Chunk-level reordering of source language sentences with automatically learned rules for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference (HLT-NAACL'06): Proceedings of the Workshop on Syntax and Structure in Statistical Translation (SSST), Rochester, 1–8.Google Scholar