Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:42:55.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breadth over depth in the semantic representations of adults with nonverbal learning disabilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2017

MARGOT ELIZABETH STOTHERS
MARGOT ELIZABETH STOTHERS*
Affiliation:
Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Western Ontario
*
*Address for correspondence: mstothe2@uwo.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Oral language in individuals with nonverbal learning disabilities (NLD) has been described as empty of meaning, despite apparently average word knowledge. The present study explored the hypothesis that depth but not breadth of semantic representations would be reduced in NLD, and that depth but not breadth would be related to nonverbal gestalt perception. A cross-sectional design compared breadth and depth of vocabulary in 50 adults with or without a diagnosis of NLD. Vocabulary results were also compared with a visual closure test. Participants with NLD had reduced vocabulary depth in comparison with controls. The NLD group also had lower scores for gestalt perception, the ability to perceive a meaningful whole from unrelated parts. Across the sample, this measure predicted scores for vocabulary depth, but not breadth. The NLD group was also less able than the Control group to estimate the size of unknown, physical features of everyday objects. Results supported clinical observations that semantic representations are unconventional and imprecise in individuals with NLD, and suggested specific cognitive underpinnings for such difficulties. Results were also compatible with separate theories of embodied and lateralized semantics. A proposal uniting these theories in a designation over elaboration model is presented.

Keywords

nonverbal learning disabilitiessemantic representationscollocationsgestalt perception
Type
Research Article
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 56 - 82
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

Andrews, M., Vigliocco, G., & Vinson, D. (2009). Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. Psychological Review, 116, 463–498.Google Scholar
Aziz-Zadeh, L., & Damasio, A. (2008). Embodied semantics for actions: Findings from functional brain imaging. Journal of Physiology Paris, 102, 35–39.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beeman, M. J. (1998). Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension. In Beeman, M. & Chiarello, C. (Eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension: perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience (pp. 255–284). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Biber, D. (2009). A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3), 275–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisbing, T. A., Olm, C. A., McMillan, C. T., Rascovsky, K., Baehr, L., Ternes, K., & Grossman, M. (2015). Estimating frontal and parietal involvement in cognitive estimation: a study of focal neurodegenerative diseases. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Meyer, J. R., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., & Mesulam, M. M. (2002). Modality independence of word comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 16, 251–61.Google Scholar
Boulenger, V., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2009). Grasping ideas with the motor system: semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1905–1914.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. (2011). Different bodies, different minds: the body specificity of language and thought. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 378–383.Google Scholar
Chwilla, D. J., Kolk, H. H. J., & Vissers, C. T. W. M. (2007). Immediate integration of novel meanings: N400 support for an embodied view of language comprehension. Brain Research, 1183, 109–123.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.Google Scholar
Corrigan, R. (2008). Constructing meaning from subtle patterns in the language environment. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 29, 109–124.Google Scholar
Coulson, S. (2006). Constructing meaning. Cognitive Science, 21, 245–266.Google Scholar
Culatta, B., & Young, C. (1992). Linguistic performance as a function of abstract task demands in children with spina bifida. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 34, 434–440.Google Scholar
Davis, J. M., & Broitman, J. (2011). Nonverbal learning disabilities in children: bridging the gap between science and practice. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Davis, M. H., & Gaskell, M. G. (2009). A complementary systems account of word learning: neural and behavioural evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 3773–3800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Della Sala, S., MacPherson, S. E., Phillips, L. H., Sacco, L., & Spinnler, H. (2004). The role of semantic knowledge on the cognitive estimation task: evidence from Alzheimer’s disease and healthy adult aging. Journal of Neurology, 251(2), 156–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denckla, M. B. (1983). The neuropsychology of social-emotional learning disabilities. Archives of Neurology, 40, 461–462.Google Scholar
Diaz, M. T., Barrett, K. T., & Hogstrom, L. J. (2011). The influence of sentence novelty and figurativeness on brain activity. Neuropsychologia, 49(3), 320–330.Google Scholar
Dien, J. (2009). A tale of two recognition systems: implications of the fusiform face area and the visual word form area for lateralized object recognition models. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1–16.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22, 133–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faust, M., & Kenett, Y. N. (2014). Rigidity, chaos and integration: hemispheric interaction and individual differences in metaphor comprehension. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, R. W. (2013). The real complexities of psycholinguistic research on metaphor. Language Sciences, 40, 45–52.Google Scholar
Gregg, N., & Jackson, R. (1989). Dialogue patterns of adults with nonverbal learning disabilities: mirrors of self regulation deficits. Learning Disabilities, 1, 63–71.Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, G. M., Forbes, P. W., & Holmes Bernstein, J. (2010). A practice-based approach to group identification in nonverbal learning disorders. Child Neuropsychology, 16, 433–460.Google Scholar
Gross-Tsur, V., Shalev, R. S., Manor, O., & Amir, N. (1995). Developmental right-hemisphere syndrome: clinical spectrum of the nonverbal learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 80–86.Google Scholar
Gupta, P., & Tisdale, J. (2009). Word learning, phonological short-term memory, phonotactic probability and long-term memory: towards an integrated framework. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 364, 3755–3771.Google Scholar
Hogan, T. P., & Brezinski, K. L. (2003). Quantitative estimation: One, two, or three abilities? Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(4), 259–280.Google Scholar
Horn, D. G., Lorch, E. P., Lorch, R. F., & Culatta, B. (1985). Distractibility and vocabulary deficits in children with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 27, 713–720.Google Scholar
Hugdahl, K., & Westerhausen, R. (Eds.) (2010). The two halves of the brain: information processing in the cerebral hemispheres. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Humphries, T., Oram Cardy, J., Worling, D. E., & Peets, K. (2004). Narrative comprehension and retelling abilities of children with nonverbal learning disabilities. Brain and Cognition, 56, 77–88.Google Scholar
Ives, B. (2003). Effect size use in studies of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 490–504.Google Scholar
Jung-Beeman, M. (2005). Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 512–518.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1994). K-SNAP: Kaufman Short Neuropsychological Assessment Procedure. Circle Pines, MN: AGS Publishing.Google Scholar
Kopera-Frye, K., Dehaene, S., & Streissguth, A. P. (1996). Impairments of number processing induced by prenatal alcohol exposure. Neuropsychologia, 34, 1187–1196.Google Scholar
Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2014). The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 71–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lajiness-O’Neill, R., & Beaulieu, I. (2002). Neuropsychological findings in two children diagnosed with hamartoses: evidence of a NLD phenotypic profile. Child Neuropsychology, 8, 27–40 Google Scholar
Mammarella, I. C., & Cornoldi, C. (2014). An analysis of the criteria used to diagnose children with Nonverbal Learning Disability (NLD). Child Neuropsychology, 20, 255–280.Google Scholar
Mammarella, I. C., Meneghetti, C., Pazzaglia, F., Gitti, F., Gomez, C., & Cornoldi, C. (2009). Representation of survey and route spatial descriptions in children with nonverbal (visuospatial) learning disabilities. Brain and Cognition, 71, 173–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNamara, T. P. (2005). Semantic priming: perspectives from memory and word recognition. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Mervis, C. B., & Robinson, B. F. (2005). Designing measures for profiling and genotype/phenotype studies of individuals with genetic syndromes or developmental language disorders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 41–64.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., & Chapman, J. P. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 40–48.Google Scholar
Molinaro, N., Canal, P., Vespignani, F., Pesciarelli, F., & Cacciari, C. (2013). Are complex function words processed as semantically empty strings? A reading time and ERP study of collocational complex prepositions. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(6), 762–788.Google Scholar
Molinaro, N., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Electrophysiological evidence of interaction between contextual expectation and semantic integration during the processing of collocations. Biological Psychology, 83(3), 176–90.Google Scholar
Myklebust, H. R. (1975). Nonverbal learning disabilities: assessment and intervention. In Myklebust, H. R. (Ed.), Progress in learning disabilities (Vol. 3, pp. 85–121). New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Palombo, J. (2006). Nonverbal learning disabilities: a clinical perspective. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Ris, M. D., Ammerman, R. T., Waller, N., Walz, N., Oppenheimer, S., Brown, T. M., … Yeates, K. O. (2007). Taxonicity of nonverbal learning disabilities in spina bifida. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13, 50–58.Google Scholar
Rissman, B. (2011). Nonverbal learning disability explained: the link to shunted hydrocephalus. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 209–215.Google Scholar
Ross, E. D. (2010). Cerebral localization of functions and the neurology of language: Fact versus fiction or is it something else? Neuroscientist, 16, 222–243.Google Scholar
Rourke, B. P. (1989). Nonverbal learning disabilities: the syndrome and the model. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Rourke, B. P., Ahmad, S. A., Collins, D. W., Hayman-Abello, B. A., Hayman-Abello, S. E., & Warriner, E. M. (2002). Child clinical pediatric neuropsychology: some recent advances. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 309–339.Google Scholar
Rourke, B. P., Del Dotto, J. E., Rourke, S. B., & Casey, J. E. (1990). Nonverbal learning disabilities: the syndrome and a case study. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 361–385.Google Scholar
Rourke, B. P., & Tsatsanis, K. D. (1996). Syndrome of nonverbal learning disabilities: psycholinguistic assets and deficits. Topics in Language Disorders, 16, 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salthouse, T. A. (2004). What and when of cognitive aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 140–144.Google Scholar
Scheeringa, M. S. (2001). The differential diagnosis of impaired reciprocal social interaction in children: a review of disorders. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 32(1), 71–89.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2012). Formulaic language and language disorders. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 62–80.Google Scholar
Seger, C. A., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2000). Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for right hemisphere involvement in processing unusual semantic relationships. Neuropsychology, 3, 361–369.Google Scholar
Semrud-Clikeman, M., & Hynd, G. W. (1990). Right hemispheric dysfunction in nonverbal learning disabilities: social, academic, and adaptive functioning in adults and children. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 196–209.Google Scholar
Semrud-Clikeman, M., Walkowiak, J., Wilkinson, A., & Christopher, G. (2010). Neuropsychological differences among children with Asperger syndrome, nonverbal learning disabilities, attention deficit disorder, and controls. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(5), 582–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shallice, T., & Evans, M. E. (1978). The involvement of the frontal lobes in cognitive estimation. Cortex, 14, 294–303.Google Scholar
Small, L. H., Simon, S. D., & Goldberg, J. S. (1988). Lexical stress and lexical access: homographs versus nonhomographs. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 272–280.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.Google Scholar
Stein, M., Klin, A., & Miller, K. (2004). Challenging case: when Asperger’s syndrome and nonverbal learning disability look alike. Pediatrics, 25, 190–195.Google Scholar
Stothers, M. E. (2005). Asymmetries in learning disability-related cognitive functions in post-secondary students: implications for reading comprehension. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
Stothers, M. E. (2016). Semantic integration in adults with nonverbal learning disabilities and autism spectrum disorder: influence of word knowledge and gestalt perception. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
Stothers, M., & Klein, P. D. (2010). Perceptual organization, phonological awareness, and reading comprehension in adults with and without learning disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 209–237.Google Scholar
Stothers, M. E., & Oram Cardy, J. E. (2012). Oral language impairments in developmental disorders characterized by language strengths: a comparison of Asperger syndrome and nonverbal learning disabilities. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 519–534.Google Scholar
Stothers, M. E., & Oram Cardy, J. (2016). Nonverbal learning disabilities and Asperger syndrome in young adults: vocabulary, gestalts, and social perception. In Rissman, B. (Ed.), Medical and educational perspectives on nonverbal learning disability in young children and adults (pp. 264–315). Hershey, PA: IGI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tew, B. (1979). The ‘cocktail party syndrome’ in children with hydrocephalus and spina bifida. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 14, 89–101.Google Scholar
van Dam, W. O., van Dijk, M., Bekkering, H., & Rueschemeyer, S.-A. (2012). Flexibility in embodied lexical-semantic representations. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 2322–2333.Google Scholar
van der Helm, P. A. (2012). Cognitive architecture of perceptual organization: from neurons to gnosons. Cognitive Processing, 13(1), 13–40.Google Scholar
Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades?. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40.Google Scholar
Volden, J. (2004). Nonverbal learning disability: a tutorial for speech-language pathologists. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 128–141.Google Scholar
Wagner, G. P., MacPherson, S. E., Parente, M., & Trentini, C. M. (2011). Cognitive estimation abilities in healthy and clinical populations: the use of the cognitive estimation test. Neurological Sciences, 32, 203–210.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler adult intelligence scale, third edition: administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence: administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Weintraub, S., & Mesulam, M. M. (1983). Developmental learning disabilities of the right hemisphere: emotional, interpersonal, and cognitive components. Archives of Neurology, 40, 463–468.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625–636.Google Scholar
Worling, D. E., Humphries, T., & Tannock, R. (1999). Spatial and emotional aspects of language inferencing in nonverbal learning disabilities. Brain and Language, 70, 220–239.Google Scholar
Yalof, J. (2006). Case illustration of a boy with nonverbal learning disorder and Asperger’s features: neuropsychological and personality assessment. Journal of Personality, 87, 15–34.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. (2014). Embodiment and language comprehension: reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 229–234.Google Scholar