Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:33:27.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors considered and ignored in plural acquisition: Frequency rules?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2015

EUGEN ZARETSKY ,
BENJAMIN P. LANGE ,
HARALD A. EULER  and
KATRIN NEUMANN
EUGEN ZARETSKY*
Affiliation:
Department of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany, and Institute of Medical Psychology, Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
BENJAMIN P. LANGE
Affiliation:
Department of Media Psychology, Institute for Human-Computer-Media, Faculty of Human Sciences, Julius Maximilian University of Wuerzburg, Germany
HARALD A. EULER
Affiliation:
Department of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, Ruhr-University Hospital, Bochum, Germany
KATRIN NEUMANN
Affiliation:
Department of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, Ruhr-University Hospital, Bochum, Germany
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr Eugen Zaretsky, Department of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, House 7A, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. tel: +49 69 6301 7272; fax: +49 69 6301 5002; mobile: +49 176 8201 9348; e-mail: yevgen.zaretsky@kgu.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several models of regularities behind plural overgeneralization patterns of four-year-old monolingual Germans and bi-/multilingual children acquiring German were empirically examined within the framework of single- and dual-route models. The factors taken into account were frequency, cue validity, productivity, and iconicity of plural allomorphs. In this large-scale cross-sectional study, the results of 893 children tested with a modified, validated version of the speech and language screening MSS and of 476 children tested with a validated language test SETK 3-5 were analyzed. For all overgeneralization models, paired groups of expected and not expected answers were compared in the Wilcoxon test. At the early stages of plural acquisition the frequency of plural allomorphs and the simplest phonetic–phonologically based regularities seem to be the crucial factors recognized by children acquiring German. Gender-based plural allomorph frequency was associated with advanced German skills. These findings support the single-route theory with its emphasis on the influence of input characteristics on children’s error patterns. No evidence was found for a default status of -s or any other plural marker, and hence for the dual-route theory.

Keywords

plural acquisitionGerman languagesingle-route modelsdual-route modelsbilingualismmorphology
Type
Research Article
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 283 - 313
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

Bartke, S. (1998). Experimentelle Studien zur Flexion und Wortbildung [Experimental studies on inflexion and word formation]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, H. (2001). How to learn a minority default: the acquisition of the German -s plural. Unpublished manuscript. Leipzig: Max-Planck-Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
Bittner, D. (2000). Sprachwandel durch Spracherwerb? Pluralerwerb [Language change through language acquisition? Plural acquisition]. In Bittner, A., Bittner, D., & Köpcke, K.-M. (Eds.), Angemessene Strukturen: Systemorganisation in Phonologie, Morphologie und Syntax (pp. 123–140). Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Bittner, D., & Köpcke, K.-M. (2001). The acquisition of German plural markings: a case study in natural and cognitive morphology. In Schaner-Wolles, C., Rennison, J., & Neubarth, F. (Eds.), Naturally! Linguistic studies in honour of Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler presented on the occasion of his 60th birthday (pp. 47–58). Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (1985). Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (1988). Morphology as lexical organization. In Hammond, M. & Noonan, M. (Eds.), Theoretical morphology (pp. 119–141). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: a multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 991–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Rothweiler, M., Woest, A., & Marcus, G. F. (1992). Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition, 45, 225–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dressler, W. U., Mayerthaler, W., Panagl, O., & Wurzel, W. U. (1987). Leitmotifs in natural morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euler, H. A., Holler-Zittlau, I., van Minnen, S., Sick, U., Dux, W., Zaretsky, Y., & Neumann, K. (2010). Psychometrische Gütekriterien eines Kurztests zur Erfassung des Sprachstandes vierjähriger Kinder [Psychometric quality criteria of a language screening for four-year-old children]. HNO, 58, 1116–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewers, H. (1999). Schemata im mentalen Lexikon: Empirische Untersuchungen zum Erwerb der deutschen Pluralbildung [Schemata in the mental lexicon: empirical studies on the acquisition of the German plural system]. In Meibauer, J. & Rothweiler, M. (Eds.), Das Lexikon im Spracherwerb (pp. 106–127). Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
Gawlitzek-Maiwald, I. (1994). How do children cope with variation in the input? The case of German plurals and compounding. In Tracy, R. & Lattey, E. (Eds.), How tolerant is universal grammar? Essays on language learnability and language variation (pp. 225–266). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, H. (2001). SETK 3-5: Sprachentwicklungstest für drei- bis fünfjährige Kinder [SETK 3-5: Test of language development for three- to five-year-old children]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Indefrey, P. (2002). Listen und Regeln: Der Erwerb und Repräsentation der schwachen Substantivdeklination des Deutschen [Lists and rules: acquisition and representation of the weak declination of German nouns]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.Google Scholar
Institut für Deutsche Sprache (2009). Korpusbasierte Grundformenliste DeReWo, v-40000g-2009-12-31-0.1, mit Benutzerdokumentation [Corpus-based lexeme list DeReWo, v-40000g-2009-12-31-0.1, with a manual]. Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache, Programmbereich Korpuslinguistik. Online: <http://www.ids-mannheim.de/kl/projekte/methoden/derewo.html>..>Google Scholar
Kauschke, C., Kurth, A., & Domahs, U. (2011). Acquisition of German noun plurals in typically developing children and children with specific language impairment. Child Development Research, DOI: 10.1155/2011/718925. Online: <http://www.hindawi.com/journals/cdr/2011/718925/>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köpcke, K.-M. (1993). Schemata bei der Pluralbildung im Deutschen [Schemata in the German plural formation]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Köpcke, K.-M. (1998). The acquisition of plural marking in English and German revisited: schemata versus rules. Journal of Child Language, 25, 293–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korecky-Kröll, K., & Dressler, U. W. (2009). The acquisition of number and case in Austrian German nouns. In Stephany, U. & Voeikova, M. D. (Eds.), Development of nominal inflection in first language acquisition: a cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 265–302). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laaha, S., Ravid, D., Korecky-Kröll, K., Laaha, G., & Dressler, W. U. (2006). Early noun plurals in German: regularity, productivity or default? Journal of Child Language, 33, 271–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leipzig University, Department for Natural Language Processing (2010). Wortschatz [Vocabulary]. Online: <http://corpora.uni-leipzig.de/download.html>..>Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1978). The acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 174.Google Scholar
Marcus, G., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: the exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 189–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayerthaler, W. (1981). Morphologische Natürlichkeit [Morphological naturalness]. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.Google Scholar
Mills, A. E. (1985). The acquisition of German. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 1: The data (pp. 141–254). Hillsdale, MI: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mugdan, J. (1977). Flexionsmorphologie und Psycholinguistik [Flexion morphology and psycholinguistics]. Tübingen: Günther Narr.Google Scholar
Neumann, K., Holler-Zittlau, I., van Minnen, S., Sick, U., Zaretsky, Y., & Euler, H. A. (2011). Katzengoldstandards in der Sprachstandserfassung: Sensitivität und Spezifität des Kindersprachscreenings (KiSS) [Fool’s gold standards in language screening: sensitivity and specificity of the Hessian child language screening test Kindersprachscreening (KiSS)]. HNO, 59, 97–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niedeggen-Bartke, S. (1999). Flexion und Wortbildung im Spracherwerb [Inflexion and word formation in the language acquisition]. In Meibauer, J. & Rothweiler, M. (Eds.), Das Lexikon im Spracherwerb (pp. 208–228). Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
Park, T.-Z. (1977). Plurals in child speech. Journal of Child Language, 5, 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, B. S., & Lowell, B. (1980). The acquisition of German plurals in native children and nonnative adults. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 18, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: the ingredients of language. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Schaner-Wolles, C. (1989). Plural- vs. Komparativerwerb im Deutschen – Von der Diskrepanz zwischen konzeptueller und morphologischer Entwicklung [Plural vs. comparative acquisition: on the discrepancy between conceptual and morphological development]. In Günther, H. (Ed.), Experimentelle Studien zur deutschen Flexionsmorphologie (pp. 155–186). Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Schaner-Wolles, C. (2001). On the acquisition of noun plurals in German. In Schaner-Wolles, C., Rennison, J., & Neubarth, F. (Eds.), Naturally! Linguistic studies in honour of Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler presented on the occasion of his 60th birthday (pp. 451–460). Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Spreng, B. (2004). Error patterns in the acquisition of German plural morphology: evidence for the relevance of grammatical gender as a cue. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 23, 147–172.Google Scholar
Stemberger, J. P. (1999). Frequency determines defaults in German: default perfect -t vs. irregular plural -s. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1040–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szagun, G. (2001). Learning different regularities: the acquisition of noun plurals by German-speaking children. First Language, 21, 109–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vollmann, R., Sedlak, M., Müller, B., & Vassilakou, M. (1997). Early verb inflection and noun plural formation in four Austrian children: the demarcation of phases and interindividual variation. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics, 33, 59–78.Google Scholar
Walter, S. (1975). Zur Entwicklung morphologischer Strukturen bei Kindern [On the development of morphological structures in children]. Unpublished master’s thesis, Heidelberg University, Institute for Psychology.Google Scholar
Wegener, H. (1995). Die Nominalflexion des Deutschen – verstanden als Lerngegenstand [The nominal inflection in German as a study subject]. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurzel, W. U. (1984). Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit [Inflexion morphology and naturalness]. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Zaretsky, E., Euler, H. A., Neumann, K., & Lange, B. P. (2014). Sociolinguistic predictors of language deficits in pre-school children with and without immigrant background. In The Asian Conference on Language Learning. Osaka, Japan 2014. Conference Proceedings (pp. 42–53). Nagoya: International Academic Forum.Google Scholar
Zaretsky, Y., Lange, B. P., Euler, H. A., & Neumann, K. (2011). Pizzas, Pizzen, Pizze: frequency, iconicity, cue validity, and productivity in the plural acquisition of German preschoolers. Acta Linguistica, 2, 22–35.Google Scholar
Zaretsky, E., Lange, B. P., Euler, H. A., & Neumann, K. (2013b). Acquisition of German pluralization rules in monolingual and multilingual children. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 3, 551–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaretsky, E., Neumann, K., Euler, H. A., & Lange, B. P. (2013a). Pluralerwerb im Deutschen bei russisch- und türkischsprachigen Kindern im Vergleich mit anderen Migranten und monolingualen Muttersprachlern [Plural acquisition in German in Russian and Turkish speaking children in comparison with other immigrants and monolingual native speakers]. Zeitschrift für Slawistik, 58, 43–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar