Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:29:09.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gabriel Radvansky and Jeff Zacks, Event Cognition. Oxford University Press, 2014. Pp. 288. ISBN: 978-0-1998-9813-8 (hardback)

Review products

Gabriel Radvansky and Jeff Zacks, Event Cognition. Oxford University Press, 2014. Pp. 288. ISBN: 978-0-1998-9813-8 (hardback)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2018

JOSHUA K. HARTSHORNE
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Boston College E-mail: joshua.hartshorne@bc.edu
EVA WITTENBERG
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of California-San Diego E-mail: ewittenberg@ucsd.edu

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

Bassok, M., Pedigo, S. F., & Oskarsson, A. T. (2008). Priming addition facts with semantic relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(2), 343353.Google ScholarPubMed
Fillmore, C. J. (1967). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. (Eds.) Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 189). New York, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12(3), 306355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, L. (1990). The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition, 1(1), 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafmiller, J. (2013). The semantics of syntactic choice: an analysis of English emotion verbs. Unpublished dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Intraub, H., Bender, R. S., & Mangels, J. A. (1992). Looking at pictures but remembering scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(1), 180191.Google ScholarPubMed
Jackendoff, R. (2007). Language, consciousness, culture: essays on mental structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipper, K., Korhonen, A., Ryant, N., & Palmer, M. (2006). Extending VerbNet with novel verb classes. In Proceedings of LREC (Vol. 2006, No. 2.2, p. 1).Google Scholar
Kurby, C. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2008). Segmentation in the perception and memory of events. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(2), 7279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levin, B., & Hovav, M. R. (2005). Argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newtson, D., & Engquist, G. (1976). The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(5), 436450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papeo, L., Negri, G. A., Zadini, A., & Ida Rumiati, R. (2010). Action performance and action-word understanding: evidence of double dissociations in left-damaged patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27(5), 428461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saltzman, E., & Holt, K. (2014) Movement forms: a graph-dynamic perspective. Ecological Psychology, 26(1/2), 6068.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Tellex, S., Thaker, P., Joseph, J., & Roy, N. (2013). Learning perceptually grounded word meanings from unaligned parallel data. Machine Learning, 94(2), 151167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toussaint, M. (2015). Logic-geometric programming: an optimization-based approach to combined task and motion planning. In IJCAI (pp. 19301936).Google Scholar
Zhang, S. (2004). Beyond the Petri dish. Nature Biotechnology, 22(2), 151152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed