Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:16:20.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New perspectives on duality of patterning: Introduction to the special issue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2014

Bart de Boer ,
Wendy Sandler  and
Simon Kirby
Bart de Boer
Affiliation:
Artificial Intelligence laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium. E-mail: bart@arti.vub.ac.be
Wendy Sandler
Affiliation:
University of Haifa. E-mail: wsandler@research.haifa.ac.il
Simon Kirby
Affiliation:
Edinburgh University. E-mail: simon@ling.ed.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

duality of patterninglanguage evolutioncombinatorial structurecompositional structure
Type
Introduction
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 4 , Special Issue 4: New perspectives on duality of patterning , December 2012 , pp. 251 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, K. & Zuberbühler, K.. 2006. The alarm-calling system of adult male putty-nosed monkeys, cercopithecus nictitans martini. Animal Behaviour 72(3). 643–653.Google Scholar
Blevins, J. 2012 [This volume]. Duality of patterning: Absolute universal or statistical tendency? Language and Cognition 4(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Galantucci, B. 2005. An experimental study of the emergence of human communication. Cognitive Science 29. 737–767.Google Scholar
Garrod, S., Fay, N., Rogers, S., Walker, B. & Swoboda, N.. 2010. Can iterated learning explain the emergence of graphical symbols? Interaction Studies 11(1). 33–50.Google Scholar
Hamano, S. 1994. Palatalization in Japanese sound symbolism. In Hinton, L., Nichols, J. & Ohala, J. J. (eds.), Sound symbolism, 148–157. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. 1960. The origin of speech. Scientific American 203. 88–111.Google Scholar
Kirby, S. 2002. Natural language from artificial life. Artificial Life 8(2). 185–215.Google Scholar
Kirby, S., Cornish, H. & Smith, K.. 2008. Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(31). 10681–10686.Google Scholar
Klamer, M. 2002. Semantically motivated lexical patterns: A study of Dutch and Kambera expressives. Language 78. 258–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. 1998. The evolution of cognition: Questions we will never answer. In Scarborough, D. & Sternberg, S. (eds.), An invitation to cognitive science, Volume 4: Methods, models, and conceptual issues, 107–132. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Martinet, A. 1980. Eléments de linguistique générale. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Meir, I., Aronoff, M., Sandler, W. & Padden, C.. 2010. Sign languages and compounding. In Scalise, S. & Vogel, I. (eds.), Compounding, 301–322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A., Krakauer, D. & Dress, A.. 1999. An error limit for the evolution of language. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 266. 2131–2136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Padden, C., Meir, I., Sandler, W. & Aronoff, M.. 2010. Against all expectations: Encoding subjects and objects in a new language. In Gerdts, D., Moore, J. & Polinsky, M. (eds.), Hypothesis A/hypothesis B: Linguistic explorations in honor of David M. Perlmutter, 573–595. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sandler, W. 2012. The phonological organization of sign languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(3). 162–182.Google Scholar
Sandler, W., Aronoff, M., Meir, I. & Padden, C.. 2011. The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29. 503–543.Google Scholar
Sandler, W., Meir, I., Padden, C. & Aronoff, M.. 2005. The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102(7). 2661–2665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott-Phillips, T. C. & Kirby, S.. 2010. Language evolution in the laboratory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14. 411–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, K., Kalish, M. L., Griffiths, T. L. & Lewandowsky, S.. 2008. Introduction. Cultural transmission and the evolution of human behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 363(1509). 3469–3476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, W. S.-Y. & Minett, J. W.. 2005. The invasion of language: Emergence, change and death. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20(5). 263–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yip, M. J. 2006. The search for phonology in other species. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(10). 442–446.Google Scholar
Zuidema, W. & de Boer, B.. 2009. The evolution of combinatorial phonology. Journal of Phonetics 37(2). 125–144.Google Scholar