We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Arppe, A., Gilquin, G., Glynn, D., Hilpert, M., & Zeschel, A.. 2010. Cognitive corpus linguistics: Five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora5. 1–27.Google Scholar
Divjak, D.2010. Structuring the lexicon: A clustered model for near-synonymy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gilquin, G. & Gries, St. Th. (eds.). 2009. Corpora and experimental methods (Special edition. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 5). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Glynn, D. & Fischer, K. (eds.). 2010. Quantitative cognitive semantics. Corpus-driven approaches. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gries, St. Th. & Stefanowitsch, A.. (eds.). 2006. Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics. Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hilpert, M.2008. Germanic future constructions. A usage-based approach to language change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, St. Th.. 2003. Constructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics8. 209–243.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B.2006. Morphosyntactic persistence in spoken English. A corpus study at the intersection of variationist sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, and discourse analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wulff, S.2009. Rethinking idiomaticity. A usage-based approach. London: Continuum.Google Scholar