Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:08:35.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A role for onomatopoeia in early language: evidence from phonological development

Part of: Iconicity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2019

CATHERINE LAING Open the ORCID record for CATHERINE LAING [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Onomatopoeia appear in high quantities in many infants’ earliest words, yet there is minimal research in this area. Instead, findings from the wider iconicity literature are generalised to include onomatopoeia, leading to the assumption that their iconic status makes them inherently learnable, thereby prompting their early production. In this review we bring together the literature on onomatopoeia specifically and iconicity more generally to consider infants’ acquisition from three perspectives: perception, production, and interaction. We consider these findings in relation to Imai and Kita’s (2014) ‘sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis’ to determine whether their framework can account for onomatopoeia alongside other iconic forms.

Keywords

onomatopoeiaphonological developmenticonicitylexical developmentlanguage acquisition
Type
Special Issue on Iconicity
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 11 , Issue 2: Special Issue on Iconicity , June 2019 , pp. 173 - 187
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

Abbott, D. (2004). Animal sounds. Online: <http://www.eleceng.adelaide.edu.au/personal/dabbott/animal.html> (accessed 30 July 2018).+(accessed+30+July+2018).>Google Scholar
Demuth, K., Culbertson, J. & Alter, J. (2006). Word-minimality, epenthesis, and coda licensing in the acquisition of English. Language and Speech, 49, 137–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demuth, K. & Tremblay, A. (2008). Prosodically-conditioned variability in children’s production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language, 35, 99–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deuchar, M. & Quay, S. (2001). Bilingual acquisition: theoretical implications of a case study. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. (2012). Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Linguistics and Language Compass, 6, 654–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M. & Akita, K. (2017). An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: on the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics, 53, 501–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsen, H. (1991). Erstspracherwerb: Der Erwerb des deutschen Lautsystems. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitaets Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsen, H. (1994). Phonological constraints and overextensions. First Language, 14, 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J. & Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, i–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernald, A. & Morikawa, H. (1993). Common themes and cultural variations in Japanese and American mothers’ speech to infants. Child Development, 64, 637–656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giard, M. H. & Peronnet, F. (1999). Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: a behavioral and electrophysiological study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 473–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hashimoto, T., Usui, N., Taira, M., Nose, I., Haji, T. & Kojima, S. (2006). The neural mechanism associated with the processing of onomatopoeic sounds. NeuroImage, 31, 1762–1770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imai, M. & Kita, S. (2014). The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369. Online <http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0298>.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imai, M., Kita, S., Nagumo, M. & Okada, H. (2008). Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition, 109, 54–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jakobson, R. (1968). Child language, aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantartzis, K., Imai, M. & Kita, S. (2011). Japanese sound-symbolism facilitates word learning in English-speaking children. Cognitive Science, 35, 575–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauschke, C. & Hofmeister, C. (2002). Early lexical development in German: a study on vocabulary growth and vocabulary composition during the second and third year of life. Journal of Child Language, 29, 735–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauschke, C. & Klann-Delius, G. (2007). Characteristics of maternal input in relation to vocabulary development in children learning German. In Gülzow, I. & Gagarina, N. (eds.), Frequency effects in language acquisition: defining the limits of frequency as an explanatory concept (pp. 181–204). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, R. D. (1992). The biology of phonological development. In Ferguson, C. A., Menn, L. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (eds.), Phonological development: models, research, implications (pp. 65–90). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Kim, N. & Davis, B. L. (2015). A phonetic approach to consonant repetition in early words. Infant Behavior and Development, 40, 193–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kita, S. (1997). Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics, Linguistics, 35, 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunnari, S. (2002). Word length in syllables: evidence from early word production in Finnish. First Language, 22, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, C. E. (2014). A phonological analysis of onomatopoeia in early word production. First Language, 34, 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, C. E. (2017). A perceptual advantage for onomatopoeia in early word learning: evidence from eye-tracking. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 161, 32–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laing, C. E. (forthcoming). Phonological motivation for the acquisition of onomatopoeia: an analysis of early words. Language Learning and Development.Google Scholar
Laing, C. E., Vihman, M. & Keren-Portnoy, T. (2017). How salient are onomatopoeia in the early input? A prosodic analysis of infant-directed speech. Journal of Child Language, 44, 1117–1139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lockwood, G., Dingemanse, M. & Hagoort, P. (2016). Sound-symbolism boosts novel word learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1274–1281.Google ScholarPubMed
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Massaro, D. W. & Perlman, M. (2017). Quantifying iconicity’s contribution during language acquisition: implications for vocabulary learning. Frontiers in Communication, 2. Online <https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2017.00004>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masuda, K. (2002). A phonetic study of sound symbolism. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Mazuka, R., Kondo, T. & Hayashi, A. (2008). Japanese mothers’ use of specialised vocabulary in infant-directed speech: infant-directed vocabulary in Japanese. In Masataka, N. (Ed.), The origins of language: unravelling evolutionary forces (pp. 39–58). Tokyo: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, S. & Crowe, K. (2018). Children’s consonant acquisition in 27 languages: a cross-linguistic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27, 1546–1571.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menn, L. & Vihman, M. M. (2011). Features in child phonology: Inherent, emergent, or artefacts of analysis? In Clements, N. & Ridouane, R. (eds.), Where do phonological features come from? (pp. 261–301). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Molholm, S., Ritter, W., Javitt, D. C. & Foxe, J. J. (2004). Multisensory visual-auditory object recognition in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 452–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. (2009). Language acquisition and socialization: three developmental stories and their implications. In Duranti, A. (ed.), Linguistic anthropology: a reader (pp. 263–301). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ortega, G. (2017). Iconicity and sign lexical acquisition: a review. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. Online <https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01280>.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozturk, O., Krehm, M. & Vouloumanos, A. (2013). Sound symbolism in infancy: evidence for sound-shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 173–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pačesová, J. (1968). The development of vocabulary in the child. Brno: Universita J. E. Purkyne.Google Scholar
Peeters, D. (2016). Processing consequences of onomatopoeic iconicity in spoken language comprehension. In Papafragou, A., Grodner, D., Mirman, D. & Trueswell, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2016) (pp. 1632–1647). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Perniss, P., Lu, J. C., Morgan, G. & Vigliocco, G. (2018). Mapping language to the world: the role of iconicity in the sign language input. Developmental Science, 21, e12551. Online <https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12551>.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, L. K., Perlman, M. & Lupyan, G. (2015). Iconicity in English and Spanish and its relation to lexical category and age of acquisition. PLoS ONE, 10, e0137147. Online <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137147>.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sasamoto, R. & Jackson, R. (2016). Onomatopoeia – showing-word or saying-word? Relevance theory, lexis, and the communication of impressions. Lingua, 175, 36–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. & Cooper, J. A. (1984). Patterns of early lexical and phonological development. Journal of Child Language, 11, 247–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tardif, T., Fletcher, P., Liang, W., Zhang, Z., Kaciroti, N. & Marchman, V. A. (2008). Baby’s first 10 words. Developmental Psychology, 44, 929–938.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, R. L., Vinson, D. P., Woll, B. & Vigliocco, G. (2012). The road to language learning is iconic: evidence from British Sign Language. Psychological Science, 23, 1443–1448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsujimura, N. (2005). Mimetic verbs and innovative verbs in the acquisition of Japanese. In Annual Meeting of the Berkley Linguistics Society (pp. 371–382). Online <https://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/BLS/article/view/874>.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. (1978). Consonant harmony: its scope and function in child language. In Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of human language (pp. 281–334). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Vinson, D. P., Cormier, K., Denmark, T., Schembri, A. & Vigliocco, G. (2008). The British Sign Language (BSL) norms for age of acquisition, familiarity, and iconicity. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 1079–1087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werner, H. & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar