Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T12:24:41.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

American Linguistic Prescriptivism: Its Decline and Revival in the 19th Century1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Glendon Drake
Glendon Drake
Affiliation:
San Diego State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aspects of nineteenth-century American life are crucial to the understanding of the history and nature of American prescriptivism. The story is not merely one of continuity from eighteenth-century Britain. An examination of linguistic thought of the nineteeth-century reveals that the prescriptive doctrine met with significant intellectual challenge from 1820 through the 40s. This reaction grew partly out of a specific revolt against rote learning, partly out of the development of national consciousness, and partly out of the ‘boundless’ intellectual tenor of the times.

The thought of the period 1850 through the 70s was a significant source of the doctrine's subsequent vigor which was to exhibit a curious and remarkable continuity into and throughout the present century. During the latter half of the century the doctrine of correctness revived with new vehemence in a new drive for uniformity and conformity. This was facilitated and accommodated in general by the intellectual milieu of the time: national integration and consolidation. The single most important specific factor was the development of the genteel cultural apparatus, as manifested linguistically by an interest in language, especially in ‘linguistic etiquette’ in genteel publication; in the reaction against innovation; in the application of intellect and logic to language; in the high premium placed by the genteel on books and authority; in the anglophile tendency of the genteel; and in the desire for a responsible, stable community.

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , December 1977 , pp. 323 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1825). Common systems of the English language. U.S. Literary Gazette, 220. 249–50.Google Scholar
Anon. (1826a). The American Journal of Education May. 307–308.Google Scholar
Anon, . (1826b). Strictures on Murray's grammar. The American Journal of Education July, September, December. 425–49, 556, 730–50.Google Scholar
Anon. (1827a). Defects in the systems of liberal education. The American Journal of Education II, 02. 80.Google Scholar
Anon. (1827b). Common education: Prevalent defects and proposed remedies. The American Journal of Education II, 03, 159.Google Scholar
Anon. (1827c). The American Journal of Education 06. 190.Google Scholar
Anon. (1827d). Review of the English teacher, or private learner guide. The American Journal of Education 08. 510, 511.Google Scholar
Anon. (1827e). Practical method of teaching languages. The American Journal of Education 11. 625.Google Scholar
Anon. (1833). American Annals of Education 02. 47.Google Scholar
Anon. (1855). Southern Literary Messenger xxi, 04. 24, 254.Google Scholar
Anon. (1864). The English language in society and in school; The American Journal of Education 06. 343–65.Google Scholar
Anon. (1870). Subjects and courses of public instruction in cities, Boston, Mass.; Special report of the Commissioner of Education, District of Columbia. The American Journal of Education. 480.Google Scholar
Anon. (1871). Americanisms: A study of words and manners. Southern Review 04. 290–318.Google Scholar
Baugh, Albert C. (1957) A history of the English language. New York: Appleton—Century—Crofts.Google Scholar
Boorstein, Daniel J. (1951). The Americans; The colonial experience. New York: Random House. 267–84.Google Scholar
Brown, Goold (1832) Critical observations of Murray's grammars. American Annals of Education 11 1, 15, 558–59.Google Scholar
Brown, Goold (1851) [1868] Grammar of English grammars. New York: W. Wood & Co.Google Scholar
Brown, James (1845). An appeal from the old theory of English grammar. Philadelphia: Grubb & Beazor. iii–iv.Google Scholar
Cardell, William S. (1825). Essay on language. New York (no imprint). 29–30.Google Scholar
Dictionary of American Biography (1936) XX. 113–14.Google Scholar
Dillard, J. L. (1973). The American Koine — Origin, rise and plateau stage. The Kansas Journal of Sociology 9 (2). 557–90.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. (1972). Sociolinguistics. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House. 24–8.Google Scholar
Hall, Fitzedward (1874) Retrogressive English. North American Review 10 308–31.Google Scholar
Hempl, George (1903) The teacher of English in his attitudes toward his subject. (No imprint.) Reprinted from PLMA xix. 4.Google Scholar
Higham, John (1969). From boundlessness to consolidation: The transformation of American culture, 1848–1860. Ann Arbor: William A. Clements Library. 25.Google Scholar
Leonard, Sterling A. (1929). The doctrine of correctness in English usage 1700–1800. Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Donald J. (1951). Snobs, slobs, and the English language. The American Scholar. Summer.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Donald J. (1952). Our national mania for correctness. The American Scholar. Summer.Google Scholar
Lyman, Rollo L. (1921). English grammar in the American schools before 1880. Washington: Government Printing Office. 12.Google Scholar
Marckwardt, Albert H. (1958). American English. New York: Oxford University Press. 50.Google Scholar
Marsh, George P. (1860). The English language in America. North American Review 10 91, 507.Google Scholar
Marsh, George P. (1863). Lectures on the English language. New York: Trustees of Columbia College. 9, 666–84.Google Scholar
May, S. J. (1829). Error in common education. The American Journal of Education. IV. 05 and 06. 253–25.Google Scholar
Mott, Frank Luther (1930). A history of American magazines. New York: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nietz, John A. (1961). Old textbooks. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. 109.Google Scholar
Rand, Asa (1833). Lecture on teaching grammar and composition. American Annals of Education, III. 04 159–61.Google Scholar
Stark, A. B. (1876). The place of English in high education. Popular Science Monthly. 11 81.Google Scholar
Webster, Noah (1826). Mr. Noah Webster's proposed dictionary. The American Journal of Education I. 05. 315–16.Google Scholar
White, Richard Grant (1870). [1927] Words and their uses. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, v, 567.Google Scholar
Whitehall, Harold (1958) The development of the English dictionary. Intro. to Webster's New World Dictionary, college edn. New York: World Publishing Co. xxxiii.Google Scholar