Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T14:40:10.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An account of social usages of Americanized argot in modern Russia1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Michael A. Korovkin
Michael A. Korovkin
Affiliation:
Faculty of Political Science and Institute of Anglo-Germanic StudiesUniversity of Tuscia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reports the emergence of a new “Americanized” argot in post-Stalinist Russia. It attempts to qualify the type of communicative code characteristic of the argot and to illuminate the link between the code and the communicative competence of argot-speaking groups. The article examines the pattern of recruitment into argot-speaking groups. It speculates on the set of relationships between this pattern and the process of socialization in the wider social milieu at school and in the families of different socioeconomic classes. (Sociolinguistics, symbolic anthropology, social change, Slavonic and Soviet studies, social boundaries and “primary groups,” revitalization movements)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , December 1987 , pp. 509 - 525
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bernstein, B. (1976). A sociolinguistic approach to socialization; with some references to educability. In Gumperz, J. & Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Burrige, K. (1969). New heaven, new earth. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1979). Language and responsibility. Hassocks: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. (1979). Class, “codes,” and conversation. Linguistics 17.Google Scholar
Gordon, J. C. B. (1980). A case-study in misinterpretation: A note on some disseminations of Bernstein by educationalists. VEA Papers in Linguistics 12.Google Scholar
Jackson, L. A. (1974). The myth of elaborated and restricted code. Higher Education Review 6(2).Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Morris, C. W. (1955). Signs, language, and behavior. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
O'Connor, J. (1973). Fiscal crisis of the state. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1949). The structure of social action. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Shils, E. (1957). Primordial, personal, sacred, and civil ties. British Journal of Sociology 8(2).Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1975). Review of B. Bernstein, Class, codes, and control. Journal of Linguistics 11.Google Scholar
van den Broeck, J. (1977). Class differences in syntactic complexity in the Flemish town of Maaseik. Language in Society 6:149–81.Google Scholar
Worsley, P. (1970). The trumpet shall sound: A study of “cargo” cults in Menaesia. London: Palladin.Google Scholar