Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T09:31:45.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dimensions of Sociolinguistics - Erving Goffman, Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press and Oxford: Blackwell, 1981. Pp. 335.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Michael Stubbs
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD England

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. 2 vols. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1981). Language, meaning, and context. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1975a). The logical Status of fictional discourse. New Literary History 6(2): 319–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. (1975b) Indirect speech acts. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3. New York: Academic Press. 5982.Google Scholar
Sperher, D., & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In Cole, P. (ed.), Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press. 295318.Google Scholar