Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T16:17:53.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discourse - Sarah Warshauer Freedman (ed.), The acquisition of written language: Response and revision. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, 1985. Pp. xv + 294.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Linda Brodkey
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6216

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beach, R., & Bridwell, L. S. (1984). New directions in composition research. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Bridwell, L. S. (1980). Revising strategies in twelfth grade students' transactional writing. Research in the Teaching of English 14:197222.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1980). The deployment of consciousness in the production of a narrative. In Chafe, W. (ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Erickson, R., & Shultz, J. (1982). The counselor as gatekeeper: Social interaction in interviews. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication 32:400414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, L., & Hayes, J.R. (1981).A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication 32:363–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, E., & Schieffelin, B. (1976). Topic as discourse: A study of topic in the conversations of children and adults. In Li, C. (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Perl, S. (1979). The composing processes of unskilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of English 13:317–36.Google Scholar
Sex bias at the computer terminal – How schools program girls (1984). Peer Computer Equity Report. PEER, 1413 K Street NW, 9th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005.Google Scholar
Sommers, N. I. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication 31:387–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakarya, S. B. (1984). The rich get computers; the poor get poorer. The American School Board Journal 171(3):30.Google Scholar