Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T18:25:38.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gesture's community: Social organization in multimodal conduct

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2012

Gregory Matoesian
Gregory Matoesian
Affiliation:
Department of Criminology, Law and Justice, University of Illinois at Chicagomatoesia@uic.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyzes the multimodal integration of gesture, talk, and sociocultural context. More specifically, I investigate how forms of Gemeinschaft/Gesellshaft community are embodied in the concrete details of multimodal form—in the iconic interplay of multimodal practice and symbolic forms of social organization. Using a focus group interview of community policing training, I show how criss-crossing laminations of participation emerge through novel gestural configurations like multimodal quotation and pragmatic beats to not only pace the rhythm of speech but simultaneously plot the spatial coordinates of social organization. In the course of events, we see how speakers integrate gesture, gaze, and postural orientation into the stream of their utterances to project rhythmically infused meanings of communal identity, social solidarity, and cultural opposition. (Multimodality, community, legal discourse)*

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , June 2012 , pp. 365 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, J. Maxwell, & Drew, Paul (1979). Order in court. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt (2001). Community. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Cohen, Anthony (1985). The symbolic construction of community. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Day, Graham (2006). Community and everyday life: London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duncan, Susan (2002). Gesture, verb aspect, and the nature of iconic imagery in natural discourse. Gesture 2:183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duszak, Anna (2002). Us and others: An introduction. In Duszak, Anna (ed.), Us and others: Social identities across languages, discourses and cultures, 1–28. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Susan (2001). Representing rape. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Erikson, Kai T. (1978). Everything in its path: Destruction of community in the Buffalo Creek flood. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Faudree, Paja (2009). Linguistic anthropology in 2008: An election-cycle guide. American Anthropologist 111(2):153–61.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan, & Irvine, Judith (1995). The boundaries of language and disciplines: How ideologies construct differences. Social Research 62:967–1001.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1963). Behavior in public places. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1979). Gender advertisements. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, & McNeill, David (1999). The role of gesture and mimetic representation in making language the province of speech. In Corballis, Michael & Lea, Stephen (eds.), The descent of mind, 155–71. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles (1986). Gestures as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica 62:29–49.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32:1489–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, & McNeill, David, & Goodwin, Marjorie (2004). Participation. In Duranti, Alessandro (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology, 222–44. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haviland, John (2000). Pointing, gesture spaces and mental maps. In McNeill, David (ed.), Language and gesture, 13–46. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hester, Stephen, & Housley, William (2002). Introduction: Ethnomethodology and national identity. In Hester, Stephen & Housley, William (eds.), Language, interaction and national identity, 1–15. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, & Thurlow, Crispin (2009). Gesture and movement in tourist spaces. In Jewitt, Carey (ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis, 253–62. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam (1986). Some reasons for studying gesture. Semiotica 62:1–28.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam (2000). Language and gesture: Unity or duality? In McNeill, David (ed.), Language and gesture, 47–63. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam (2004). Gesture. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maguire, Ed, & Wells, William (2002). Community policing as communication reform. In Giles, Howard (ed.), Law enforcement, communication and community, 33–66. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, Peter (1988). Community policing as a drama of control. In Green, Jack & Mastrofski, Stephen (eds.), Community policing: Rhetoric or reality, 27–45. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory (2005). Struck by speech revisited: Embodied stance in jurisdictional discourse. Journal of Sociolinguistics 9:167–94.Google Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory, & Coldren, James (2002). Language and bodily conduct in focus group evaluations of legal policy. Discourse and Society 13:491–515.Google Scholar
McNeill, David (1992). Hand and mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, David (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, David (2010). Gesture: A psycholinguistic approach. In Hogan, Patrick (ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences, 344–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Desmond (1977). Manwatching. New York: Abrams.Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia (2008). What gestures reveal about the nature of metaphor. In Cienki, Alan & Müller, Cornelia (eds.), Metaphor and gesture, 219–45. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Myers, Greg (2004). Matters of opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Neal, Sarah, & Walters, Sue (2008). Rural be/longing and rural social organizations: Conviviality and community-making in the English countryside. Sociology 42:279–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Sigrid (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, & Capps, Lisa (2001). Living narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan, & Reicher, Stephen (1987). Discourses of community and conflict. British Journal of Social Psychology 26:25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puchta, Claudia, & Potter, Jonathan (2004). Focus group practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, Dennis (2002). Evaluation in multi-agency anti-crime partnerships. Crime Prevention Studies 14:171–225.Google Scholar
Sampson, Robert (2002). Transcending tradition: New directions in community research, Chicago style. Criminology 40(2):213–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, Beverly (2003). The rhetoric of risk: Technical documentation in hazardous environments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Scheibman, Joanne (2004). Inclusive and exclusive patterning of the English first person plural: Evidence from conversation. In Achard, Michel & Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.), Language, culture and mind, 377–96. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Scheibman, Joanne (2007). Subjective and intersubjective uses of generalizations in English conversations. In Englebretson, Robert (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse, 111–37. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (1987). Discourse markers. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack (2006). Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39:377–409.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1979). Language structure and linguistic ideology. In Clyne, Paul, Hanks, William, & Hofbauer, Carol (eds.), The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels, 193–24. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1993) Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Lucy, John (ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1997). The improvisational performance of culture in realtime discursive practice. In Sawyer, R. Keith (ed.), Creativity in performance, 265–312. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Skarzynska, Krystyna (2002). We and they in Polish political discourse. In Duszak, Anna (ed.), Us and others: Social identities across languages, discourses and cultures, 249–64. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Streeck, Jurgen (1993). Gesture as communication I: Its coordination with gaze and speech. Communication Monographs 60:275–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jurgen (1995). On projection. In Goody, Ester (ed.), Social intelligence and interaction, 87–110. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Jurgen (2008). Gesture in political communication: A case study of the Democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign. Research in Language and Social Interaction 41(2):154–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jurgen (2009). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, & Sidnell, Jack (2005). Introduction: Multimodal interaction. Semiotica 156:1–20.Google Scholar
Studdert, David (2005). Conceptualizing community: Beyond the state and individual. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Widdicombe, Sue (1998). Identity as an analysts' and participants' resource. In Antaki, Charles & Widdicombe, Sue (eds.), Identities in talk, 191–206. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth; Cillia, Rudolf; Reisigl, Martin; & Liebhart, Karin (1999). The discursive construction of national identity. London: Sage.Google Scholar