Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T10:33:40.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linguistic change and diffusion: description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Peter Trudgill
Peter Trudgill
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistic Science, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Linguistic geography has remained relatively unaffected by recent developments in sociolinguistic theory and method and theoretical geography. In this paper it is argued that insights and techniques from both these disciplines will be of value in improving descriptions of geographical variation in language, and that these improvements will in turn lead to more adequate explanations for certain of the social and spatial characteristics of linguistic change. Evidence in favour of a sociolinguistic methodology and new cartographic techniques in dialect geography is drawn from empirical studies in urban dialectology, in East Anglia, England, and rural dialectology, in Norway. (Sociolinguistic variation, dialectology, linguistic change, British English, Norwegian.)

Type
Articles: Areal Contexts of Change
Information
Language in Society , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , October 1974 , pp. 215 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Afendras, E. (1969). Sociolinguistic history, sociolinguistic geography and bilingualism. In Giornate internazionali di sociolinguistica. Rome: Instituto Luigi Sturzo.Google Scholar
Afendras, E. (1970a). Spatial and social aspects of multilingual communication. Pensiero e linguaggio in operazioni I. 131–9.Google Scholar
Afendras, E. ( 1970b). Diffusion processes in language: prediction and planning. Quebec: C.I.R.B. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Bach, A. (1950). Deutsche Mundartforschung. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. (1971). Trying to talk in the new paradigm. Papers in Linguistics 4, 312–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. (1974). Variation and linguistic theory. Washington Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Brown, L. A. (1968). Diffusion processes and location: a conceptualframework and bibliography. Philadelphia: Regional Science Research Institute.Google Scholar
Brown, L. A. & Moore, E. G. (1971). Diffusion research: a perspective. In Board, C. et al. (eds) Progress in geography. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Chen, M. & Hsieh, H.-I. (1971). The time variable in phonological change. JL 7, 1–13.Google Scholar
Christaller, W. (1950). Das Grundgerüst der räumlichen Ordnung in Europa: die Systeme der europäischen zentralen Orte. Frankfurter Geographische Hefte II.Google Scholar
Daan, J. (1971). Verschuiven van isoglossen. Taal en Tongval 23, 77–9.Google Scholar
De Camp, D. (1971). Toward a generative analysis of a post-creole speech continuum. In Hyrnes, D. H. (ed.) Pidginisation and creolisation of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D. (1957). Population distribution and community structure. Cold Harbor Springs Symposium in Quantitative Biology 22, 357–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewert, A. (1963). The French language. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Fretheim, T. (1970). Transformasjonell generativ grammatikk: en skisse. In Hanssen, E. (ed.) Studier i norsk sprákstruktur. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Hägerstrand, T. (1952). The propagation of innovation waves. Lund studies in geography, series B, human geography 4. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Hägerstrand, T. ( 1965a). A Monte Carlo approach to diffusion. Archives Europèennes de Sociologie 6, 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hägerstrand, T. (1965b). Quantitative techniques for analysis of the spread of information and technology. In Anderson, C. A. & Bowman, M. J. (ed) Education and economic development. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Hägerstrand, T. (1966). Aspects of the spatial structure of social communication and the diffusion of information. Papers of the Regional Science Association 16, 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hägerstrand, T. (1967a). On the Monte Carlo simulation of diffusion. In Garrison, W. L. & Marble, D. F. (eds) Quantitative geography, Pt I. Northwestern University: Department of Geography.Google Scholar
Hägerstrand, T.(1967b). Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Haggett, P. (1965). Locational analysis in human geography. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, B. (1965). Das deutsche R. Linguistics 5.Google Scholar
Jernudd, B. (1968). Linguistic integration and national development: a case study of the Jebel Marra area, Sudan. In Fishman, J. A. et al. (eds) Language problems of developing nations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Jernudd, B. (unpublished). Chorology and linguistics.Google Scholar
Jernudd, B. & Willingsson, T. (1968). A sociolectal study of the Stockholm region. Svenska Landsmāl och Svenskt Folkliv, 141–7.Google Scholar
Jernudd, B. & Willingsson, T. (unpublished). Chorology and linguistics.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, P. (1960). Zum Nordfriesischen r. In Brouwer, J. H. (ed.) Fryske Studzjes. Assen: Gorcum.Google Scholar
Karisson, C. (1958). Social mechanisms: studies in sociological theory. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Keller, R. E. (1961). German dialects: phonology and morphology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kurath, H. (1972). Studies in area linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1965). On the mechanism of linguistic change. In Kreidler, C. W. (ed.) Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Some principles of linguistic methodology. Lins I. 97–120.Google Scholar
Labov, W. et al. (1972). A quantitative study of sound change in progress. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Martinet, A. (1969). Lefrancais sans fard. Paris: Presses Universitaires.Google Scholar
Moser, H. (1954). Sprachgrenzen und ihre Ursachen. ZfMF 22, 87–111.Google Scholar
Moulton, W. G. (1952). Jacob Böhme's uvular r. J. Eng. Germ. Philology 51, 83–9.Google Scholar
Olsson, G. (1965). Distance and human interaction. Philadelphia: Regional Science Research Institute.Google Scholar
Orton, H. & Barry, M. V. (1969). Survey of English dialects. Vol. II: the West Midland counties. Leeds: Arnold.Google Scholar
Orton, H. & Barry, M. V. & Halliday, W. J. (1962). Survey of English dialects. Vol. I: the six northern counties and the Isle of Man. Leeds: Arnold.Google Scholar
Orton, H. & Barry, M. V. & Tilling, P. M. (1969). Survey of English dialects. Vol. III: the East Midland counties and East Anglia. Leeds: Arnold.Google Scholar
Orton, H. & Barry, M. V. & Wakelin, M. F. (1967). Survey of English dialects. Vol. IV: the Southern counties. Leeds: Arnold.Google Scholar
Panov, M. V. (ed.) (1968). Russkij jazyk i sovetskoe obscestvo (sociologolingvisticeskoe issledovanie) Vol. 4. Moscow.Google Scholar
Pickford, G. R. (1956). American linguistic geography: a sociological appraisal. Word 12, 211–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popperwell, R. G. (1963). The pronunciation of Norwegian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, A. & Sale, R. (1969). Elements of cartography. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J. (1972). Die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar.Google Scholar
Sjöstedt, C. G. (1936). Studier over r-ljuden i syd.skandinaviska mäl. Lund.Google Scholar
Skautrup, P. (1968). Det danske sprogs historie. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Steinsholt, A. (1964). Målbryting i Hedrum. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Steinsholt, A. (1972). Målbryting i Hedrum 30 år etter. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. J. (1972). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. LinS I. 179–95.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. J. (1974) The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, K. (1927). Deutsche Sprachlandschaften. DDG 23.Google Scholar
Wang, W. S.-Y. (1969). Competing changes as a cause of residue. Lg. 45. 9–25.Google Scholar
Wyld, H. C. (1956). A history of modern colloquial English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar