Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:06:32.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Noun-classes, lexical stocks, multilingualism, and the history of the Cameroon Grassfields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Jean-Pierre Warnier
Jean-Pierre Warnier
Affiliation:
University of Yaoundé (Cameroon)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The linguistic situation in the Grassfields of Cameroon poses a problem, indeed a challenge. Basic vocabulary counts and shared lexical innovations point to one language classification and historical interpretation; but innovations in noun-classes do not agree and point to another (Voorhoeve 1976). To reconcile these findings in a consistent historical explanation, one must have recourse to some hypothesis as to the past relationships among the speakers of the languages. Such a hypothesis must be controlled by whatever can be known about the sociolinguistic history, as it were, of the area. In recent ethnohistorical research, I have been able to reconstruct a nineteenth-century pattern of multilingualism as an essential part of the social and political fabric of the Grassfields. Of the three hypotheses that might be advanced to explain the present language situation, the third is best supported by this reconstruction and other evidence. Further work is underway to test the hypothesis. In the meanwhile, the case shows the necessity of sociolinguistic as well as narrowly linguistic reconstruction in explanation of actual cases of change.

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 8 , Issue 2-3 , August 1979 , pp. 409 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chilver, E. M. (1961). Nineteenth-century trade in the Bamenda Grassfields, Southern Cameroon. Afrika und Ubersee XLV. 233–58.Google Scholar
Chilver, E. M., & Kaberry, P. M. (1971). The Tikar problem: A non-problem. Journal of African Languages 10 (2). 13–14.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, A. G. (1926) An assessment report on the Bafut area of the Bamenda Division, Cameroons Province, Nigeria. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, A. G. (1931). Assessment report on Bafut and Babanki, Bamenda Division. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Hook, R. J. (1934). An intelligence report on the associated village groups occupying the Bafut N.A.A. of the Bamenda Division of the Cameroons Province. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Leroy, J. (forthcoming). The Ngemba group: Mankon, Bagangu, Mundum I, Bafut, Nkwen, Bambwi, Pinyin, Awing. In Hyman, L. M. & Voorhoeve, J. (eds), Noun-classes in Grassfields Bantu. Paris: SELAF.Google Scholar
Leroy-Warnier, J., & Voorhoeve, J. (1975). Vowel contraction and vowel reduction in Mankon. Studies in African Linguistics 6 (2). 125–49.Google Scholar
Newton, R. (1934). An intelligence and re-assessment report on the village groups occupying the Ngemba N.A.A. of the Bamenda Division. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Sharwood-Smith, B. A. (1926). A report on the Mogamaw and Ngemba speaking families of the Widekum tribe of the Bamenda Division. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Stallcup, K. L., & Hyman, L. M. (1975). The Grassfields Bantu Working Group. Unpublished communication to the 6th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, Columbus, Ohio, 11–13 April 1975.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G., & Kaufman, T. (n.d.). Toward an adequate definition of creolization. 57 pp.Google Scholar
Voorhoeve, J. (1971). The linguistic unit Mbam—Nkam (Bamileke, Barnum and related languages). Journal of African Languages 10 (2). 1–12.Google Scholar
Voorhoeve, J. (1976). Bantu/Bane. Communication to the 12th Congress of the West African Linguistic Society, Ile-Ife, 14–20 March 1976.Google Scholar
Warnier, J.-P. (1975). Pre-colonial Mankon: The development of a Cameroon chiefdom in its regional setting. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. University Microfilms Ltd, No. 76. 3227.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, H. (forthcoming). Le commerce précolonial de l'ouest (plateau bamilékéGrassfields, région bamoum et Bafia). Communication faite au colloque international du CNRS. Contribution de la recherche ethnologique a` l'histoire des civilisations du Cameroun. Paris, 1973.Google Scholar
Williamson, K. (1971). ‘The Benue–Congo languages and Ijo’. Current Trends in Linguistics 7. 245–306.Google Scholar