Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:57:53.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Place attachment and linguistic variation: A quantitative analysis of language and local attachment in a rural village and an urban social housing area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2020

Malene Monka
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Pia Quist*
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Astrid Ravn Skovse
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Address for correspondence: Pia Quist, University of Copenhagen, Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics, Section of Dialectology, Emil Holms Kanal 2, 2300København S, Denmarkpia.quist@hum.ku.dk

Abstract

This article presents the results of a quantitative analysis of language variation and place attachment in two different places in Denmark—a rural, mono-ethnic village where traditional dialect is still used in everyday practices, and a multiethnic suburban social housing district where speakers use features associated with regional dialect and multiethnic youth styles. It is argued that variationist sociolinguistics, dialect research, as well as sociolinguistics that foregrounds situated interaction analysis need to develop methodologies that include and combine information about speakers’ individual mobility histories, local practices, and future orientations in relation to language use and place. For this purpose, this study employs a quantified measure, an index of local attachment, of speakers’ attachment to their local area. The index is calculated on the basis of insights from ethnographic fieldwork and interviews, and is compared to the variation of three linguistic variables in each location. Results show differences between the two places, the rural and the urban communities, as well as between individuals that can be explained by differences in place affordances, life histories, and future orientation. (Place, local attachment, mobility, dialect, multiethnic speech style, quantitative analysis)*

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We would like to express our gratitude to Jenny Cheshire and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments and useful suggestions on an earlier version of this article. We would also like to thank the members of the LaPUR project's advisory board who gave us constructive comments and encouraged us to pursue the idea of developing an index of local attachment. The study presented in this article is a result of a long-term collaborative teamwork in the LaPUR project. Thus, the order of author names is purely alphabetical.

References

REFERENCES

Aasheim, Stina (1995). Kebab-norsk: fremmedspråklig påvirkning påungdomsspråket i Oslo [Kebab Norwegian: Influence of foreign languages on the youth language in Oslo]. Oslo: University of Oslo master's thesis.Google Scholar
Adey, Peter (2010). Mobility. Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ag, Astrid (2010). Sprogbrug og identitetsarbejde hos senmoderne storbypiger [Language use and identity work among late modern city girls]. Copenhagen: Københavns Universitets Humanistiske Fakultet.Google Scholar
Andersen, Hans Skifter (2016). Valg af uddannelse og fraflytning fra yderområder [Choice of education and moving out from peripheral areas]. Copenhagen: Center for Bolig og Velfærd.Google Scholar
Andersson, Roger, & Thelander, Mats (1994). Internal migration, biography formation, and linguistic change. In Bengt Nordberg (ed.), The sociolinguistics of urbanization: The case of the Nordic countries, 5186. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anton, Charis E., & Lawrence, Carmen (2014). Home is where the heart is: The effect of place of residence on place attachment and community participation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 40:451–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonsich, Marco (2010). Searching for belonging: An analytical framework. Geography Compass 4(6):644–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter (2013). The geography of language: Steps toward a new approach. FRAGL 16. Online: https://portal.uni-freiburg.de/sdd/fragl/2013.16.Google Scholar
Beck, Steen, & Ebbensgaard, Aase (2009). Mellem Bagenkop og Harboøre [Between Bagenkop and Harboøre]. Odense: Syddansk Universitet.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodén, Petra (2010). Pronunciation in Swedish multiethnolect. In Quist, Pia & Svendsen, Bente A. (eds.), Multilingual urban Scandinavia: New linguistic practices, 6578. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bortoni-Ricardo, Stella Maris (1985). The urbanization of rural dialect speakers: A sociolinguistic study in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Britain, David (2010a). Language and space: The variationist approach. In Auer, Peter & Schmidt, Jürgen Erich (eds.), Language and space, 142–63. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Britain, David (2010b). Conceptualisations of geographic space in linguistics. In Lameli, Alfred, Kehrein, Roland, & Rabanus, Stefan (eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation. Vol. 2: Language mapping, 6997. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Britain, David (2013). The role of mundane mobility and contact in dialect death and dialect birth. In Schreier, Daniel & Hundt, Marianne (eds.), English as a contact language, 165–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Britain, David (2016). Sedentarism and nomadism in the sociolinguistics of dialect. In Coupland, Nikolas (ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates, 217–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary (2003). Sociolinguistic nostalgia and the authentication of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(3):398416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burbano-Elizondo, Lourdes (2008). Language variation and identity in Sunderland. Sheffield: University of Sheffield Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
Carmichael, Katie (2017). Displacement and local linguistic practices: R-lessness in post-Katrina Greater New Orleans. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(5):696719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. K. (2000). Region and language variation. English World-Wide 21:169201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. K., & Trudgill, Peter (1980). Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny; Kerswill, Paul; Fox, Sue; & Torgersen, Eivind (2011). Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(2):151–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Mette Vedsgaard (2010). One of my kind? Language and ethnicity among Danish adolescents. In Quist, Pia & Svendsen, Bente A. (eds.), Multilingual urban Scandinavia: New linguistic practices, 207–24. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornips, Leonie, & de Rooij, Vincent A. (eds.) (2018). The sociolinguistics of place and belonging: Perspectives from the margins. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas (2003). Sociolinguistic authenticities. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(3):417–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas (2010). The authentic speaker and the speech community. In Llamas, Carmen & Watt, Dominic (eds.), Language and identities, 99112. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Cresswell, Tim (2006). On the move: Mobility in the modern western world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2003). Elephants in the room. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(3):392–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2008). Where do ethnolects stop? International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1–2):2542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2010). Who's there? Language and space in social anthropology and interactional linguistics. In Auer, Peter & Schmidt, Jürgen Erich (eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation. Vol. 1: Theories and methods, 163–78. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Farrugia, David (2015). The mobility imperative for rural youth: The structural, symbolic and non-representational dimensions of rural youth mobilities. Journal of Youth Studies 19(6):836–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fix, Sonya (2014). AAE as bounded ethnolinguistic resource for white women with African American ties. Language and Communication 35:5574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grønnum, Nina (1998). Fonetik og fonologi [Phonetics and phonology]. Viborg: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Gustafson, Per (2002). Place, place attachment and mobility: Three sociological studies. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University dissertation.Google Scholar
Hansen, Claus D. (2014). Gender differences in place attachment and residential mobility. Conference proceeding for the 19th Nordic Demographic Symposium. Online: https://www.academia.edu/33511836/Gender_differences_in_place_attachment_and_residential_mobility.Google Scholar
Hidalgo, M. Carmen, & Hernández, Bernardo (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21(3):273–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaspers, Jürgen (2007). In the name of science?: On identifying an ethnolect in an Antwerp secondary school. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies 42. London: King's College London. Online: https://www.academia.edu/6464767/WP42_Jaspers_2007._In_the_name_of_science_On_identifying_an_ethnolect_in_an_Antwerp_secondary_school.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara (2004). Place, globalization, and linguistic variation. In Fought, Carmen (ed.), Sociolinguistic variation: Critical reflections, 6583Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara (2010a). Language and geographical space. In Auer, Peter & Schmidt, Jürgen (eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation. Vol. 1: Theories and methods, 118. Berlin: De Gruyter MoutonGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara (2010b). Indexing the local. In Nikolas Coupland (ed.), Handbook of language and globalization, 386405. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt (1988). Immigrant children's Swedish: A new variety? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 9(1–2):129–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, Kjeld (2003). Standard Danish, Copenhagen sociolects, and regional varieties in the 1900s. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 159:2943.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore (2009). The macro-level social meaning of late-modern Danish accents. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 41:167–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Larsen, Troels Schultz (2008). Udsatte boligområder og områdeprofiler. In Andersen, John (ed.), Ressourcemobiliserende beskæftigelsespolitik: Strategier og erfaringer fra udsatte byområder, 4788. Frederiksberg: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Lenker, Ursula (2000). The monasteries of the Benedictine Reform and the ‘Winchester School’: Model cases of social networks in Anglo-Saxon England? European Journal of English Studies 4(3):225–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewicka, Maria (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology 31(3):207–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina L. (1992). Recent developments in Germanic linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löw, Martina (2016). The sociology of space: Materiality, social structures, and action. Trans. by Goodwin, Donald. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, Lian Malai (2015). Fighters, girls and other identities: Sociolinguistics in a martial arts club. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maegaard, Marie (2007). Udtalevariation og -forandring i københavnsk: En etnografisk undersøgelse af sprogbrug, sociale kategorier og social praksis blandt unge påen københavnsk folkeskole. Danske Talesprog 8:1277.Google Scholar
Maegaard, Marie; Monka, Malene; Mortensen, Kristine Køhler; & Stæhr, Andreas Candefors (eds.) (2019). Standardization as sociolinguistic change: A transversal study of three traditional dialect areas. London: Routledge, to appear.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Jonathan (2004). Language change and sociolinguistics: Rethinking social networks. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehr, Kaj (1986). Vollsmose: En bydel i Odense. Odense: Samvirkende Byggeselskab i Odense.Google Scholar
Milani, Tommaso (2010). What's in a name? Language ideology and social differentiation in a Swedish print-mediated debate. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14:116–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James, & Milroy, Lesley (1985). Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21(2):339–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley (1980). Language and social networks. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley (2002). Mobility, contact and language change: Working with contemporary speech communities. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(1):3130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley, & Milroy, James (1992). Social network and social class: Towards an integrated sociolinguistic model. Language in Society 21(1):126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monka, Malene (2013). Sted og sprogforandring: En undersøgelse af sprogforandring i virkelig tid hos mobile og bofaste informanter fra Odder, Vinderup og Tinglev [Place and language change: An investigation of real time language change among mobile and non-mobile informants from Odder, Vinderup and Tinglev]. Danske Talesprog 13:1336.Google Scholar
Monka, Malene (2018). Place-making and dialect: A real time panel study from two Danish dialect areas. In Cornips & de Rooij, 213–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monka, Malene (2019). Southern Jutland: Language ideology as a means to slow down dialect leveling. In Maegaard, Marie, Monka, Malene, Mortensen, Kristine Køhler, & Stæhr, Andreas Candefors (eds.), Standardization as sociolinguistic change: A transversal study of three traditional dialect areas. London: Routledge, to appear.Google Scholar
Monka, Malene, & Hovmark, Henrik (2016). Sprogbrug blandt unge i Bylderup anno 2015 [Language use among young people in Bylderup anno 2015]. Danske Talesprog 16:73114.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Chris, & Moore, Emma (2017). Language and a sense of place: Studies in language and region. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko (2001). The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Stephen O. (1993). Network determination of linguistic variables? American Speech 68:161–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Inge Lise (2003). Traditional dialects of Danish and the de-dialectalization 1900–2000. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 159:928.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Inge Lise (2005). Processes of standardization in Scandinavia. In Auer, Peter, Hinskens, Frans, & Kerswill, Paul (eds.), Dialect change: Convergence and divergence in European languages, 171–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Inge Lise (2009). Dialektbegrebets opkomst og nationalromantikken. In Gudiksen, Asgerd, Hovmark, Henrik, Quist, Pia, Scheuer, Jann, & Sletten, Iben Stampe (eds.), Dialektforskning i 100 år [Dialect reseach in 100 years], 6582. Copenhagen: Nordisk Forskningsinstitut, Københavns Universitet.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Karen Margrethe (1986). Mødet mellem sprogene i den dansk-tyske grænseregion: En-, to- eller flersprogede børn i Sønderjylland [The meeting of the languages in the Danish-German border region: One-, two- and multilingual children in Southern Jutland]. Aabenraa: Institut for Grænseregionsforskning.Google Scholar
Pharao, Nicolai; Kristiansen, Tore; Møller;, Janus Spindler & Maegaard, Marie (2015). Eksperimentelle sprogholdningsstudier: Fra helhedsvurderinger til enkelttræk. In Gregersen, Frans & Kristiansen, Tore (eds.), Hvad ved vi nu: Om danske talesprog?, 109–26. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum.Google Scholar
Pharao, Nicolai; Maegaard, Marie; Møller;, Janus Spindler & Kristiansen, Tore (2014). Indexical meanings of [s1] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts. Language in Society 43:131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quist, Pia (2000). Ny københavnsk ‘multietnolekt’: Om sprogbrug blandt unge i sprogligt og kulturelt heterogene miljøer [New Copenhagen ‘multiethnolect’: Language use among young people in linguistically and culturally heterogeneous neighborhoods]. Danske Talesprog 1:143210.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia (2008). Sociolinguistic approaches to multiethnolect: Language variety and stylistic practice. International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1–2):4361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quist, Pia (2010). Untying the language-body-place connection: A study on linguistic variation and social style in a Copenhagen community of practice. In Auer, Peter & Schmidt, Jürgen Erich (eds.), Language and space: An international handbook of linguistic variation, 632–48. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia (2017). Sprog-krop-sted: Dialektsamfundets meningsskabende orden. In Östman, Jan-Ola, Sandström, Caroline, Gustavsson, Pamela, & Södergård, Lisa (eds.), Ideologi, identitet, intervention: Nordisk dialektologi 10 [Ideology, identity, intervention: Nordic dialectology 10], 5772. Helsinki: Helda.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia (2018). Alternative place naming in the diverse margins of an ideologically mono-lingual society. In Cornips & de Rooij, 239–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quist, Pia (2020a) Local speech and ethnicity in and across communities. In Hall-Lew, Lauren, Moore, Emma, & Pedesva, Rob (eds.), Social meaning and linguistic variation: Theorizing the third wave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, to appear.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia (2020b) Urban contact dialects – Emergence and variability. In Kerswill, Paul & Wiese, Heike (eds.), Urban contact dialects and language change: Insights from the global North and South. London: Routledge, to appear.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia, & Skovse, Astrid Ravn (2019). Regional dialect and multiethnic youth style in a Danish social housing project. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, to appear.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia, & Svendsen, Bente Ailin (2019). Urban speech styles of Germanic languages. In Putnam, Michael T., & Page, B. Richard (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of Germanic linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, to appear.Google Scholar
Ritzau (2013). Indvandrerpiger spurter frem i skolesystemet [Immigrant girls move forwards in the school system]. Fyens Stiftstidende, February 2013. Online: https://www.fyens.dk/erhverv/Indvandrerpiger-spurter-frem-i-skolesystemet/artikel/2242028.Google Scholar
Sand, Thomas (2014). Udkantsdanmark: Kvinderne rejser – mændene står marginaliserede tilbage [Outskirts Denmark: The women leave – the men are left behind marginalized]. Berlingske, August 2016. Online: https://www.berlingske.dk/samfund/udkantsdanmark-kvinderne-rejser-maendene-staar-marginaliserede-tilbage.Google Scholar
Schoonen, Rob, & Appel, René (2005). Street language: A multilingual youth register in the Netherlands. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 26(2):85117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheller, Mimi, & Urry, John (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A 38(2):207–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skjekkeland, Martin (2009). Språk og samfunn i endring [Language and society undergoing change]. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Skovse, Astrid Ravn (2018). Udgangspunkter og orienteringspunkter: En undersøgelse af socio-geografisk orientering, hverdagsmobilitet og sproglig praksis blandt unge to steder i Danmark. [Outsets and destinations: On the relationship between socio-geographic orientation, everyday mobility and linguistic practice among adolescents in two Danish settings]. Copenhagen: The University of Copenhagen dissertation.Google Scholar
Sollid, Hilde (2013). Ethnolects in Northern Norway: From national negligence to local linguistic pride. In Siemund, Peter, Gogolin, Ingrid, Schulz, Monika Edith, & Davydova, Julia (eds.), Multilingualism and language diversity in urban areas, 6394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stæhr, Andreas Candefors (2010). Rappen reddede os: Et studie af senmoderne storbydrenges identitetsarbejde i fritids- og skolemiljøer [Rap saved us: A study of late modern urban boys’ identity work in leisure and school environments]. Copenhagen: Det Humanistiske Fakultet, Københavns Universitet master's thesis.Google Scholar
Stroud, Christopher (2004). Rinkeby Swedish and semilingualism in language ideology debates: A Bourdieuan perspective. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(2):196214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundgren, Eva (2002). Återbesök i Eskilstuna: En undersökning av morfologisk variation och förändring i nutida talspråk [Revisiting Eskilstuna: A study of morphologic variation and change in presentday spoken langauge]. Uppsala: Institution för Nordiska Språk ved Uppsala Universitet.Google Scholar
Svendsen, Bente A., & Quist, Pia (2010). Introduction. In Quist, Pia & Svendsen, Bente A. (eds.), Multilingual urban Scandinavia: New linguistic practices, xiiixxiii. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svendsen, Bente A., & Røyneland, Unn (2008). Multiethnolectal facts and functions in Oslo, Norway. International Journal of Bilingualism 12(1–2):6383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thissen, Lotte (2018). The politics of place-making and belonging through language choice within center-periphery dynamics in Limburg, The Netherlands. In Cornips & de Rooij, 125–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Türker, Emel (1995). Social network theory: A critical approach. Dilbilim 5666.Google Scholar
Vollsmosesekretariatet (2001). Kvarterplan for Vollsmose [Neighbourhood plan for Vollsmose]. Odense: The Municipality of Odense.Google Scholar
von Herder, Johann Gottfried (1772). Abhandlung über den Ursprung der Sprache. Berlin: Berliner Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Watt, Dominic (2002). ‘I don't speak with a Geordie accent, I speak, like, the Northern accent’: Contact-induced levelling in the Tyneside vowel system. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(1):4463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiese, Heike (2011). The role of information structure in linguistic variation: Evidence from a German multiethnolect. In Gregersen, Frans, Parrott, Jeffrey K., & Quist, Pia (eds.), Language variation: European perspectives III, 8395. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiese, Heike (2012). Kiezdeutsch: Ein Neuer Dialekt Entsteht. Munich: C. H. Beck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiese, Heike (2013). From feature pool to pond: The ecology of new urban vernaculars. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies 104. Online: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/ecs/research/research-centres/ldc/publications/workingpapers/abstracts/wp104-from-feature-pool-to-pond--the-ecology-of-new-urban-vernaculars-.Google Scholar
Winther, Malene Brandt, & Svendsen, Gunnar Lind Haase (2012). ‘The rotten banana’ fires back: The story of a Danish discourse of inclusive rurality in the making. Journal of Rural Studies 28:466–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yndigegn, Carsten (2003). Unges valg af videregående uddannelse [Young peoples choice of further education]. Aabenraa: Institut for Grænseregionsforskning.Google Scholar
Yuval-Davis, Nira (2006). Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice 40:197214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar