Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:23:49.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Playing out loud: Videogame references as resources in friend interaction for managing frames, epistemics, and group identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Sylvia Sierra
Sylvia Sierra*
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Department of Linguistics 1421 37th Street NW Washington, DC 20057, USAsas283@georgetown.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines how friends in their mid-twenties appropriate texts from videogames they have played to serve particular functions in their everyday face-to-face conversations. Speakers use references to the videogames Papers, Please and The Oregon Trail to shift the epistemic territories of conversations when they encounter interactional dilemmas. These epistemic shifts simultaneously rekey formerly problematic talk (on topics like rent, money, and injuries) to lighter, humorous talk, reframing these issues as being part of a lived videogame experience. Overlapping game frames are laminated upon real-life frames, and are strengthened by embedded frames containing constructed dialogue. This study contributes to understanding how epistemic shifts relying on intertextual ties can shift frames during interactional dilemmas in everyday conversation, which is ultimately conducive to group identity construction. (Intertextuality, framing, epistemics, identity, interactional sociolinguistics, discourse analysis, humor, videogames)*

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , April 2016 , pp. 217 - 245
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agha, Asif (2004). Registers of language. In Duranti, Alessandro (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology, 23–45. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif (2005). Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1):38–59.Google Scholar
Apperley, Thomas (2010). What games studies can teach us about videogames in the English and literacy classroom. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 33(1):12–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Ed. by Holquist, Michael, Trans. by Emerson, Caryl & Holquist, Michael. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail (1986). The problem of speech genres. In Emerson, Caryl & Holquist, Michael (eds.), Speech genres and other late essays, 60–102. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, & Briggs, Charles L. (1990). Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology 19:59–88.Google Scholar
Becker, Alton (1994). Repetition and otherness: An essay. In Johnstone, Barbara (ed.), Repetition in discourse: Interdisciplinary perspectives, vol. 2, 162–75. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Beers Fägersten, Kristy (2012). Intertextual quotation. In Ayass, Ruth & Gerhardt, Cornelia (eds.), The appropriation of media in everyday life, 79–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Berger, Richard, & McDougall, Julian (2013). Reading videogames as (authorless) literature. Literacy 47(3):142–49.Google Scholar
Bryant, Jennings, & Bryant, Alison (2001). Television and the American family. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryce, Jennifer W., & Leichter, Hope Jensen (1983). The family and TV: Forms of mediation. Journal of Family Issues 4(2):309–28.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary (1999). ‘Why be normal?’: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society 28(2):203–23.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace (2001). Laughing while talking. In Tannen, Deborah & Alatis, James (eds.), Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics (GURT) 2001: Linguistics, language, and the real world: Discourse and beyond, 36–49. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., & Gerrig, Richard J. (1990). Quotations as demonstrations. Language 18(4):764–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1961). Fun in games. In Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction, 17–81. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics 46(1):8–23.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H. (1996). Shifting frame. In Slobin, Dan Isaac, Gerhardt, Julie, Kyratzis, Amy, & Guo, Jiansheng (eds.), Social interaction, social context, and language: Essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp, 71–82. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Cynthia (2002). ‘I'm Mommy and you're Natalie’: Role-reversal and embedded frames in mother-child discourse. Language in Society 31(5):679–720.Google Scholar
Gordon, Cynthia (2008). A(p)parent play: Blending frames and reframing in family talk. Language in Society 37(3):319–49.Google Scholar
Gordon, Cynthia (2009). Making meanings, creating family: Intertextuality and framing in family interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John (2012). The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction 45(1):30–52.Google Scholar
Hitosugi, Claire Ikumi; Schmidt, Matthew; & Hayashi, Kentaro (2014). Digital game-based learning (DGBL) in the L2 classroom: The impact of the UN's off-the-shelf videogame, Food Force, on learner affect and vocabulary retention. CALICO Journal 31(1):19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, Susan (1993). Participation frameworks in sportscasting play: Imaginary and literal footings. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Framing in discourse, 114–45. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail (1978). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In Schenkein, Jim (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction, 219–48. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia (1986). The Kristeva reader. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William, & Fanshel, David (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lacasa, Pilar; Martinez, Rut; & Mendez, Laura (2008). Developing new literacies using commercial videogames as educational tools. Linguistics and Education 19(2):85–106.Google Scholar
Lim, Sung-joo, & Holt, Lori L. (2011). Learning foreign sounds in an alien world: Videogame training improves non-native speech categorization. Cognitive Science 35(7):1390–1405.Google Scholar
Lull, James (1990). Inside family viewing: Ethnographic research on television audiences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, Jennifer (1987). Couples sharing stories. Communication Quarterly 35(2):144–70.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza (2012). Coordinating action and talk-in-interaction in and out of video games. In Ayass, Ruth & Gerhardt, Cornelia (eds.), The appropriation of media in everyday life, 231–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. (1989). Intertextuality in humor. Humor-International Journal of Humor Research 2(2):117–40.Google Scholar
Pope, Lucas (2013). Papers, Please. (Version 1.1.65) [Computer software]. Japan: 3909 LLC.Google Scholar
Piirainen-Marsh, Arja (2012). Organising participation in video gaming activities. In Ayass, Ruth & Gerhardt, Cornelia (eds.), The appropriation of media in everyday life, 195–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rawitsch, Don; Bill, Heinemann; & Dillenberger, Paul (1985). The Oregon Trail. (Apple II version) [Brand name videogame]. Brooklyn Center: Minnesota Educational Computing Consortium.Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey, & Heritage, John (2006). The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society 35(5):677–705.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (1988). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sclafani, Jennifer (2015). Family as a framing resource for political identity construction: Introduction sequences in presidential primary debates. Language in Society 44(3):369–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sierra, Sylvia, & Alexandra, Botti (2014). ‘You haven't been to Queens’: The epistemics of identity and place. LSA Annual Meeting Extended Abstracts. Online: http://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/ExtendedAbs/article/view/2397/2175.Google Scholar
Spiegel, Lynn (1992). Make room for TV: Television and the family ideal in postwar America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spiegel, Lynn 2001. Welcome to the dreamhouse: Popular media and postwar suburbs. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Spreckels, Janet (2012). ‘I wanna become a real rock star’: Para-social interactions of German adolescent girls with television talent shows. In Ayass, Ruth & Gerhardt, Cornelia (eds.), The appropriation of media in everyday life, 161–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (1989/2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (1984/2005). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. New edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (2006). Intertextuality in interaction: Reframing family arguments in public and private. Text & Talk 26(4–5):597–617.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah, & Wallat, Cynthia (1993). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Framing in discourse, 57–76. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thornborrow, Joanna (1997). Playing power: Gendered discourses in a computer games magazine. Language and Literature 6(1):43–55.Google Scholar
Tovares, Alla (2006). Public medium, private talk: Gossip about a TV show as ‘quotidian hermeneutics’. Text & Talk 26(4–5):463–91.Google Scholar
Tovares, Alla (2012). Watching out loud: A television quiz show as a resource in family interaction. In Ayass, Ruth & Gerhardt, Cornelia (eds.), The appropriation of media in everyday life, 105–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Trester, Anna Marie (2012). Framing entextualization in improv: Intertextuality as an interactional resource. Language in Society 41(2):237–58.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun (2013). The field of epistemic discourse analysis. Discourse Studies 15(5):497–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varenne, Hervé; Andrews, Gillian; Hung, Aaron; & Wessler, Sarah (2013). Polities and politics of ongoing assessments: Evidence from video-gaming and blogging. In Tannen, Deborah & Trester, Anna Marie (eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and new media, 27–46. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar