Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T12:56:58.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rolf Sandell, Linguistic style and persuasion. (European Monographs in Social Psychology Series). London and New York: Academic Press, 1976. Pp xiv+329.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Howard Giles
Howard Giles
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol B58 1HH, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language in Society , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , August 1978 , pp. 242 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allport, G. W. (1968). The historical background of modern social psychology. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (eds), Handbook of social psychology, Vol. I. Reading, Mass.:Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Berger, C. R. (1977). Theory and research in interpersonal communication: an overview and explication of issues. Mimeo.: Communication Studies, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Burgoon, M., Jones, S. B. & Stewart, D. (1975). Toward a message centered theory of persuasion: three empirical investigations of language intensity. Human Communication Research I, 240–56.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. L., Fishman, J. A., Lown, L., Schaier, B. & Seckbach, F. (1977). Language, technology and persuasion in the Middle East: three experimental studies. In Giles, H. (ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations (European Social Psychology Monograph Series), London & New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fielding, C. & Fraser, C. (in press). Language and interpersonal relations. In Markova, I. (ed), Language in its social context. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour. Reading, Mass.:Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Giles, H. (1977). Social psychology and applied linguistics: towards an integrative approach. ITL: A Review of Applied Linguistics 33. 27–42.Google Scholar
Giles, H.(1978). Sociolinguistics and social psychology: an introductory essay. In Giles, H. & Clair, R. St. (eds), Language and social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Giles, H. & Powesland, P. F. (1975). Speech style and social evaluation (European Social Psychology Monograph Series), London & New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Himmelfarb, S. & Eagly, A. H. (1974). Readings in attitude change. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution 2, 51–60.Google Scholar
Kielser, C. A., Collins, B. E. & Miller, N. (1969). Attitude change: A critical analysis of theoretical approaches. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lind, E. A. & O'Barr, W. M. (1978). The social significance of speech in the courtroom. In Giles, H. & Clair, R. St. (eds), Language and social psychology, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change (European Social Psychology Monograph Series), London & New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Norton, R. W. (1976). Foundation of a communicator style construct. Mimeo.: Speech Communication, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. (1978). Voice and speech correlates of perceived social influence in simulated juries. In Giles, H. & Clair, R. St. (eds), Language and social psychology. Oxford: Black-well.Google Scholar
Scherer, K & Giles, H. (eds) (in press). Social markers in speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar