Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:38:43.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Samoan speechmaking across social events: One genre in and out of a fono*1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Alessandro Duranti
Alessandro Duranti
Affiliation:
Istituto di Glottologia, Università di Roma
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper addresses the relevance of a functional approach to the study of speech genres. The range of variation found in spontaneous performances of a traditional genre of Samoan speechmaking (lāuga) can be explained and partly predicted by referring to the social and cultural context of speaking. Particular features of variation are attributed to the following factors: (1) the purposes of the social events, (2) the temporal setting of its performance, (3) the range and social identities of the participants, and (4) the weight given to performance as a key for delivering and interpreting speechmaking. (Oratory, ethnography of communication, cross-contextual variation, performance, Samoan language and culture.)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 1983 , pp. 1 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrahams, R. (1976). Talking Black. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. (1977). Verbal art as performance. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Bauman, R., & Sherzer, J. (eds.) (1974). Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bloch, M. (ed.) (1975). Political language and oratory in traditional society. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brenneis, D. (1978). The matter of talk: Political performances in Bhatgaon. Language in Society 7: 159–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenneis, D. (1980). Straight talk and sweet talk: Political discourse in a community of equals. In Bauman, R. & Sherzer, J. (eds.), Working Papers in Sociolinguistics. Southwest Educational Development laboratory. Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. (1981a). The FONO: A Samoan speech event. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Department of linguistics, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. (1981b). The Samoan Fono: A sociolinguistic study. Pacific Linguistics, Series B. vol. 80. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, R.S. Pac.S., Australian National University.Google Scholar
Firth, R. (1975). Speech-making and authority in Tikopia. In Bloch, M. (ed.). 29–43.Google Scholar
Frake, C. (1964). How to ask for a drink in Subanun. American Anthropologist 66: 127–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frake, C. (1972). “Struck by speech”: The Yakan concept of litigation. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 130–60.Google Scholar
Freeman, D. (1978). “A happening frightening to both ghosts and men”: A case study from Western Samoa. In Gunson, N. (ed.), The changing Pacific. Essays in honor of M.E. Maude. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, L. (1974). Samoan village. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 35–71.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations of sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1975). Breakthrough into performance. In Ben-Amos, D. & Goldstein, K. (eds.), Folklore, performance, and communication. The Hague: Mouton. 11–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(Reprinted as h. 3 in Hymes, D., “In vain I tried to tell you.” Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1981.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, J. (1979). Formality and informality in communicative events. American Anthropologist 81: 773–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keesing, F., & Keesing, M. (1956). Elite communication in Samoa. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Larkin, F. (1971). Review of the second edition of M. Mead's The social organization of Manu'a. Journal of Polynesian Society 6: 219–22.Google Scholar
Love, J. (1979). Samoan variations. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Mead, M. (1930). The social organization of Manu'a. Honolulu: B. P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 76.Google Scholar
Milner, G. B. (1961). The vocabulary of respect. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9: 296–317.Google Scholar
Milner, G. B. (1966). Samoan dictionary. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1981). Variation and error: A sociolinguistic approach to language acquisition in Samoa. To appear in Slobin, D. (ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53: 361–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, E. (1965). Proverbial expressions of the Samoans. Wellington: The Polynesian Society.Google Scholar
Shore, B. (1977). A Samoan theory of action: Social control and social order in a Polynesian paradox. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago.Google Scholar