Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T14:35:07.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Something on the order of around forty to forty-four”: Imprecise numerical expressions in biomedical slide talks1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Betty Lou Dubois
Betty Lou Dubois
Affiliation:
Department of Communication StudiesNew Mexico State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To investigate forms and functions of imprecise numerical expressions in biomedical slide talks, tokens were extracted from fifty-two talks presented at the 1979 annual meeting of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. Imprecise expressions include rounding, extreme rounding (to multiples of five or ten), ranges (both explicit and implicit), common fractions, and common multiples, all of which can be hedged, either simply or multiply. Imprecision can be occasioned by factors such as preliminary nature of results, small number of experimental animals, questionably applicable technique or apparatus, and inability to measure all members of a class. Rhetorically, imprecision foregrounds other, more precise quantities which the experimenter considers important, and thus, it can be seen as modality. Imprecision marks the talks as preinformation in Ziman's model of the social production of science and also as simultaneous popularization and peer communication. (Biomedical slide talks, imprecise numerical expressions, scientific rhetoric, modality, Zimanian social production of science)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , December 1987 , pp. 527 - 541
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bell, E. T. (1937). Men of mathematics. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Cole, J. R., & Cole, S. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dubois, B. L. (1980a). Genre and structure of biomedical speeches. Forum Linguisticum. 5(2): 140–69.Google Scholar
Dubois, B. L. (1980b). The use of slides in biomedical speeches. English for Specific Purposes. 1(1): 45–50.Google Scholar
Dubois, B. L. (1981a). Nontechnical arguments in biomedical speeches. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. 24(3): 399–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubois, B. L. (1981b). The management of pity in biomedical speeches. In Copeland, J. E. & Davis, P. W. (eds.), The Seventh LACUS Forum 1980. Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam. 249–57.Google Scholar
Dubois, B. L. (1982). “And the last slide please.” Regulatory language function at biomedical meetings. World Language English. 1(4): 263–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, B. L. (1983). The function of intonation contours in biomedical speeches. In Hattori, S. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguists. Tokyo: Permanent International Congress of Linguists. 1004–07.Google Scholar
Dubois, B. L. (1984). Paragraph structure of biomedical speeches: Preliminary report. In Manning, A. et al. (eds.), The Tenth LACUS Forum 1983. Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam. 323–33.Google Scholar
Dubois, B. L. (1985a). Poster sessions at biomedical meetings. Design and presentation. English for Specific Purposes. 4:37–48.Google Scholar
Dubois, B. L. (1985b). Popularization at the highest level. Poster sessions at biomedical meetings. International Journal of the Sociology of Language. 56:67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, B. L. (1986). From New England Journal of Medicine and Journal of the American Medical Association through the Associated Press to local newspaper. Scientific translation for the laity. In Bungarten, T. (ed.), Wissenschaftssprache und Gesellschaft. Hamburg: Akademion. 243–53.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Loffler-Laurian, A.-M. (1983). Les expressions de la mesure dans les textes scientifiques. Revue de Linguistique Romane. 47(185–86):59–101.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mitroff, I. I. (1974). The subjective side of science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ziman, J. R. (1974). Public knowledge: An essay concerning the social dimension of science. Reprint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar