Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:02:47.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

David Block, Social class in applied linguistics. New York: Routledge, 2014. Pp. xiv, 201. Pb. $44.95.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2015

Robin Dodsworth
Robin Dodsworth*
Affiliation:
Department of English, North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC, 27695-8105, USArobin_dodsworth@ncsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Language in Society , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , September 2015 , pp. 581 - 584
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bucholtz, Mary (2007). Shop talk: Branding, consumption, and gender in American middle-class youth interaction. In McElhinny, Bonnie (ed.), Words, worlds, and material girls: Language, gender, globalized economy, 371–402. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, Stephen, & Kosack, Godula (1973). Immigrant workers and class structure in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mallinson, Christine (2006). The dynamic construction of race, class, and gender through linguistic practice among women in a black Appalachian community. Raleigh: North Carolina State University dissertation.Google Scholar
Mallinson, Christine, & Dodsworth, Robin (2009). Revisiting the need for new approaches to social class in variationist sociolinguistics. Sociolinguistic Studies 3(2):253–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar