Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:37:31.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The delicate constitution of identity in face-to-face accommodation: A response to Trudgill

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2008

NIKOLAS COUPLAND
NIKOLAS COUPLAND
Affiliation:
Cardiff University, Centre for Language and Communication Research, Colum Drive CF10 3EU, Cardiff, Wales, UK, coupland@cardiff.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In sociolinguistics, where identity tends to be our first explanatory resource, Peter Trudgill's claim that identity is “irrelevant” as a factor in his area of interest is particularly striking. There are at least three questions here. The first is Trudgill's direct concern: whether identity considerations impinged on the development of new national colonial varieties. The second is the underlying question of whether identity, in itself and in general, can stand as a motive for sociolinguistic action and change. The third is whether face-to-face linguistic accommodation, which Trudgill invokes as the core process through which new dialects come to be, can and does function in the absence of identity considerations.

Type
DISCUSSION
Information
Language in Society , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 267 - 270
Copyright
© 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Coupland, Nikolas (2001). Introduction: Sociolinguistic theory and social theory. In Sociolinguistics and social theory, 1–26. London: Longman.
Coupland, Nikolas (2007). Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coupland, Nikolas, & Jaworski, Adam (1997). Relevance, accommodation, and conversation: Modeling the social dimension of communication. Multilingua 16:235–58.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard (1973). Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics 15:87–109.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard; Coupland, Justine; & Coupland, Nikolas (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In Howard Giles, Justine Coupland, & Nikolas Coupland (eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics, 1–68. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Meyerhoff, Miriam (1998). Accommodating your data: The use and misuse of accommodation theory in sociolinguistics. Language and Communication 18:205–25.Google Scholar