Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:26:26.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Educational linguistics - Raija Markkanen, Cross-language studies in pragmatics (Jyväskylä Cross-Language Studies No. 11). Jyväskylä, Finland: Department of English, University of Jyväskylä, 1985. Pp. 99.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Thomas W. DuBois
Affiliation:
Department of Folklore and FolklifeUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia, PA 19104

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Franck, D. (1981). Seven sins of pragmatics: Theses about speech act theory, conversational analysis, linguistics, and rhetoric. In Parret, H., Sbisa, M., & Verschuren, J. (eds.), Possibilities and limitations of pragmatics. Proceedings of the conference on pragmatics. Urbino; 07 8–14, 1974. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 225–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B. (1981). Acquiring social competence in a second language. RELC Journal 9(2): 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, P. (ed.) (1971). Explorations in mathematical anthropology. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Setälä, E. ([1926] 1951). Suomen kielioppi. Helsinki: Tietosanakirja Oy.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics 4:91112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, J. (1981). Introduction. In J. Walters (ed.), The sociolinguistics of deference and politeness (Special issue of International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27). 710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar