Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T06:48:32.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ellen Schauber and Ellen Spolsky, The bounds of interpretation: Linguistic theory and literary text. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1986. Pp. x + 215.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Elizabeth Closs Traugott
Elizabeth Closs Traugott
Affiliation:
Departments of Linguistics and English, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language in Society , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 1990 , pp. 295 - 298
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Culler, J. (1975). Structuralist poetics: Structuralism, linguistics, and the study of literature. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culler, J. (1982). On deconstruction: Theory and criticism after structuralism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology, trans, by Spivak, G. C.. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W. (1985). Competing motivations. In Haiman, J. (ed.), Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 343–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. (1987). Emergent grammar. Papers from the thirteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 139–57.Google Scholar
Hopper, P., & Thompson, S. (1984). The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar. Language 60: 703–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1981). In vain I tried to tell you: Essays in Native American ethnopoetics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. (1980). Linguistic theory in America: The first quarter-century of transformational generative grammar. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Pratt, M. L. (1977). Toward a speech act theory of literary discourse. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1987). Repetition in conversation: Toward a poetics of talk. Language 63: 574–605.Google Scholar