Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:00:30.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Haiku as a discourse regulation device: A stanza analysis of Japanese children's personal narratives1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Masahiko Minami
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Education, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
Allyssa McCabe
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Education, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138

Abstract

Conversational narratives of 17 Japanese children aged 5 to 9 were analyzed using stanza analysis (Gee 1985; Hymes 1982). Three distinctive features emerged: (1) the narratives are exceptionally succinct; (2) they are usually free-standing collections of three experiences; (3) stanzas almost always consist of three lines. These features reflect the basic characteristics of haiku, a commonly practiced literary form that often combines poetry and narrative, and an ancient, but still ubiquitous game called karuta, which also displays three lines of written discourse. These literacy games may explain both the extraordinary regularity of verses per stanza and the smooth acquisition of reading by a culture that practices restricted, ambiguous, oral-style discourse. The structure of Japanese children's narratives must be understood within the larger context of omoiyari “empathy” training of Japanese children. Empathy training may account for the production, comprehension, and appreciation of ambiguous discourse in Japanese society. (Cultural differences in discourse style, the relationship among oral language, literacy, and literature)

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrams, M. H. (1971). A glossary of literary terms. 3rd ed.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Azuma, H. (1986). Why study child development in Japan? In Stevenson, H., Azuma, H., & Hakuta, K. (eds.), Child development and education in Japan. New York: Freeman. 312.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes, and control Vol. 1: Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (1980). The development of consciousness in the production of a narrative. In Chafe, W. L. (ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production, 3. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 950.Google Scholar
Clancy, P. M. (1980). Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In Chafe, W. L. (ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production, 3. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 127201.Google Scholar
Clancy, P. M. (1986). The acquisition of communicative style in Japanese. In Schieffelin, B. B. & Ochs, E. (eds.), Language socialization across cultures. New York: Cambridge University Press. 373524.Google Scholar
Cummings, W. K. (1980). Education and equality in Japan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, K. D., & Snow, C. E. (1987). Interrelationships among prereading and oral language skills in kindergartners from two social classes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 2:125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doi, T. (1971). The anatomy of dependence. Trans. Bester, J.. New York: Harper & Row. [Original title: Amae no kozo. Tokyo: Kodansha.]Google Scholar
Elkins, K. (1989). Stanzas in children's narratives - do they exist in English? Unpublished manuscript, Harvard Graduate School of Education.Google Scholar
Empson, W. (1955). Seven types of ambiguity. 3rd ed. rev. New York: Meridan.Google Scholar
Feagans, L. (1982). The development and importance of narratives for school adaptation. In Feagans, L. & Farran, D. (eds.), The language of children reared in poverty. New York: Academic. 95118.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. (1985). The narrativization of experience in the oral style. Journal of Education 167:935.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. (1986). Units in the production of narrative discourse. Discourse Processes 9:391422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. P. (1989a, 10). Stanzas: The intersection of psycho and socio linguistics. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development,Boston.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P.. (1989b). Two styles of narrative construction and their linguistic and educational implications. Discourse Processes 12:287307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graybeal, C. M. (1981). Memory for stories in language-impaired children. Applied Psycholinguistics 2:269–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, P. L., Ripich, D. N., & Dastoli, S. L. (1986). Story structure, cohesion, and propositions in story recalls by learning disabled and non-disabled children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 15(6)1539–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, C. L. (1978). Story retelling used with average and learning disabled readers as a measure of reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly 1:6269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemphill, L. (1989). Topic development, syntax, and social class. Discourse Processes 12:267–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, H. G. (1958). An introduction to haiku: An anthology of poems and poets from Basho to Shiki. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Hinds, J. (1984). Topic maintenance in Japanese narratives and Japanese conversational interaction. Discourse Processes 7:465–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P., & Thompson, S. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2):251–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1981). "In vain I tried to tell you": Studies in Native American ethnopoetics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1982). Narrative form as a “grammar” of experience: Native Americans and a glimpse of English. Journal of Education 2:121–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1985). Language, memory, and selective performance: Cultee's “Salmon's myth” as twice told to Boas. Journal of American Folklore 98:391434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1990). Thomas Paul's Sametl: Verse analysis of a (Saanich) Chinook jargon text. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 5(1):71106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imoto, N. (1959). Haiku koza 1: Haikaishi [Haiku lecture 1: The history of haiku]. Tokyo: Meijishoin.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. R. (1982). Narratives: A new look at communication problems in older languagedisordered children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 13:144–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumon Education Institute (1988). Kongetsu no haiku. [The haiku of this month. Tanoshii yochien: Sukusuku room Happy kindergarten: Growing-up room]. 12:2.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Cohen, P., Robins, C., & Lewis, J. (1968). A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. Vol. 2. (Cooperative Research Project No. 3288.) Washington, DC: Office of Education.Google Scholar
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In Helm, J. (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press. 1244.Google Scholar
Lebra, T. S. (1976). Japanese patterns of behavior. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, O.-Y. (1983). Haiku de Nihon o yomu: Naze “furuike no kawazu” nanoka - Nihonjin no bi-ishiki, kodo-yoshiki o saguru [Reading Japan with Haiku: Why “a frog in an old pond” - examination of sense of beauty and behaviors of the Japanese]. Kyoto: PHP Institute.Google Scholar
Levi, G., Musatti, L., Piredda, M., & Sechi, E. (1984). Cognitive and linguistic strategies in children with reading disabilities in an oral storytelling test. Journal of Learning Disabilities 17:406–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liles, B. Z. (1985). Cohesion in the narratives of normal and language-disordered children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 28:123–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makimura, K. (1989). Haiku, hyakka-ryoran [Haiku, alive like all sorts of bright flowers]. Asahi Shinbun Newspaper Extra Report and Analysis 2(26):3236.Google Scholar
Matsui, T. (1967). Masaoka Shiki. Tokyo: Ofusha.Google Scholar
McCabe, A., & Peterson, C. (1991). Getting the story: A longitudinal study of parental styles in eliciting narratives and developing narrative skill. In McCabe, A. & Peterson, C. (eds.), New directions in developing narrative structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 217254.Google Scholar
Michaels, S. (1981).“Sharing time”: Children's narrative styles and differential access to literacy. Language in Society 10:423–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaels, S., & Collins, J. (1984). Oral discourse styles: Classroom interaction and the acquisition of literacy. In Tannen, D. (ed.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 219–44.Google Scholar
Murayama, K. (1984). Ryoyo haiku [Convalescence haiku]. In Murayama, K. & Yamashita, K. (eds.), Haiku-yogo no kiso-chishiki [Basic knowledge of haiku terms]. Tokyo: Kadokawa. 286–91.Google Scholar
Okubo, T. (1958). Shogakusei no kotoba [Elementary-school children's language]. Tokyo: Shunjusha.Google Scholar
Okubo, T. (1959) Shikoryoku o sodateru hanashi-kotoba kyoiku [Spoken-language education to raise thinking power]. Tokyo: Shunjusha.Google Scholar
Peterson, C., & McCabe, A. (1983). Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a child's narrative. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, F. P. (1986). Oral narratives of learning-disabled students. Topics in Language Disorders 7(1):2130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (1981). Narrative, literacy, and face in interethnic communications. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Shibata, H. (1984). Daidokoro haiku [Kitchen haiku]. In Murayama, K. & Yamashita, K. (eds.), Haiku-yogo no kiso-chishiki [Basic knowledge of haiku terms]. Tokyo: Kadokawa. 185189.Google Scholar
Shigaki, I. S. (1987). Language and the transmission of values: Implications from Japanese day care. In Pillion, B., Hedley, C. N., & DiMartino, E. C. (eds.), Home and school: Early language and reading. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 111–21.Google Scholar
Shimazu, T., Yunoue, S., & Uryu, Y. (1978). Senku-rengashu [Collection of one thousand chained poems]. Tokyo: Kotenbunko.Google Scholar
Shirane, H. (1990, 12). Matsuo Basho as haiku poet. Paper presented at the Reichauer Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Soga, M. (1983). Tense and aspect in modern colloquial Japanese. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, H. W., Lee, S., Chen, C., Stigler, J. W., Hsu, C., & Kitahara, S. (1990). Contexts of achievement. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 55(1–2, Serial No. 221).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevenson, H. W., Stigler, J. W., Lee, S., Lucker, G. W., Kitahara, S., & Hsu, C. (1985). Cognitive performance and academic achievement of Japanese, Chinese, and American children. Child Development 56:718–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weaver, P.A., & Dickinson, D. K. (1982). Scratching below the surface structure: Exploring the usefulness of story grammars. Discourse Processes 5:225–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, G. (1985). Preschool literacy-related activities and success in school. In Olson, D., Torrance, N., & Hildyard, A. (eds.), Literacy, language, and learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yamada, Y. (1956). Manyoshu to Nihon-bungei [The Manyoshu and Japanese literature]. Tokyo: Chuokoron.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, K. (1969). Haiku no sekai [The world of haiku]. Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar
Yasuda, A. (1962). Nihon no shika [Japanese poems]. Osaka: Sogensha.Google Scholar