Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T06:56:15.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How taboo are taboo words for girls?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Vivian De Klerk
Vivian De Klerk
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics and English Language, Rhodes University, P.O. Box 94 Grahamstown, 6140South Africa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the past five years, there has been much interest in the question of whether women are really as concerned about politeness and status as they have been made out to be by such writers as Baroni and D'Urso (1984), Crosby and Nyquist (1977), Lakoff (1973), Spender (1980), and Trudgill (1972). Despite the commonly held perception that it is only males who bandy about derogatory and taboo words (Bailey 1985; Flexner 1975), Risch (1987) provided counterevidence based on data obtained in the United States. The results of the present study, based on data obtained in South Africa, strongly support her findings and challenge the assumption that women stick to standard speech, citing evidence that young females are familiar with, and use, a wide range of highly taboo/slang items themselves. In particular, attention is devoted to the question of pejorative words applicable to males and females, respectively, and the view that there are only a few pejorative terms commonly used to describe males (particularly by females) is challenged. (Women's language, politeness, linguistic taboo, stereotypes, slang, expletives, prestige forms).

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 277 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, R. (1985). S(outh) A(frican) E(nglish) slang: Form, functions, and origins. South African Journal of Linguistics 3(1):1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baroni, M. R., & D'Urso, V. (1984). Some experimental findings about the question of politeness and women's speech. Language in Society 13:67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, F., & Nyquist, L. (1977). The female register: An empirical study of Lakoff's hypotheses. Language in Society 6:313–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D. (1987). The Cambridge encyclopaedia of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, H. (1989). What makes language bad? Language and Communication 9(1–2): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Klerk, V. A. (1990). Slang: A male domain? Sex Roles 22(9/10):589–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Klerk, V. A. (1991). Expletives: Men only? Communications Monographs 58:156–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, G. F. (1980). The social role of slang. In Giles, H., Robinson, P., & Smith, P. (eds.), Language. Oxford: Pergammon. 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumas, B. K., & Lighter, J. (1978). Is slang a word for linguists? American Speech 53:5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flexner, S. B., & Wentworth, H. (1975). Preface. In Wentworth, H. & Flexner, S. B. (eds.), Dictionary of American slang. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar
Graves, R. (1927). Lars Porsena, or the future of swearing and improper language. Cited by R. Harris, “Lars Porsena revisited.” In Ricks, C. & Michaels, L. (eds.), The state of the language, 1990. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Greer, G. (1971). The female eunuch. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (1990). Lars Porsena revisited. In Ricks, C. & Michaels, L. (eds.), The state of the language. London: Faber and Faber, 411–21.Google Scholar
Hudson, K. (1983). The language of the teenage revolution. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1922). Language: its nature, development, and origin. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society 2:45–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, B. (1974). Dirty words can harm you. Redbook 143: 33.Google Scholar
Legman, G. (1968). Rationale of the dirty joke: An analysis of sexual humour. Memphis: Castle Books.Google Scholar
Miller, C., & Swift, K. (1978). Words and women: New language in new limes. New York: Anchor Doubleday.Google Scholar
Milward, D. (1937). The origin and development of theslang in use among the women students in the University of Cape Town in the year 1937. Unpublished Masters thesis, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
Risch, B. (1987). Women's derogatory terms for men: That's right, dirty words. Language in Society 16:353–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S. (1984). The language of children and adolescents. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ryan, E. B. (1979). Why do low prestige varieties persist? In Giles, H. & St, R. Clair (eds.), Language and Social Psychology. Baltimore: University Park Press. 145–57.Google Scholar
Schulz, M. (1975). The semantic derogation of women. In Thorne, B. & Henley, N. (eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 64–75.Google Scholar
Spender, D. (1980). Man made language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Staley, C. M. (1978). Male-female use of expletives: A heck of a difference in expectations. Anthropological Linguistics 20(8): 367–80.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. (1975). Paradigmatic woman: The prostitute. In Thorne, B. & Henley, N. (eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 223–4.Google Scholar
Swan, M. (1980). Practical English usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1972). Sex, covert prestige, and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1:179–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, M. (1990). Fighting talk. In Ricks, C. & Michaels, L. (eds.), The state of the language. London: Faber and Faber. 100–9.Google Scholar