Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T06:55:21.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“I'm a woman but I know God leads my way”: Agency and Tzotzil evangelical discourse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2004

AKESHA BARON
AKESHA BARON
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-3100, abaron@u.washington.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For indigenous Tzotzil Protestants in Chiapas, the emergence of a new discourse about God is restructuring social interactions. Discourse data point to an arresting intersection of Protestant beliefs, discourse strategies, and gender. This case study supports recent theorizing in language and gender concerning the need to attend to shifting identities and contexts where gender can become less salient. The performance of a Protestant identity in which gender is transcended opens up new possibilities for agency, particularly for women who otherwise lack sanctioned authority. Strategic manipulation of Protestant discourse in verbal performances allows one woman to enact a position of moral authority that empowers her to pursue an innovative plan. As an important means through which Tzotzil Protestants dictate and create their lives, praying in the evangelical world provides a useful site for the study of unusual kinds of performative utterances.This article benefited greatly from pointers and suggestions from Laada Bilaniuk, Anne Curzan, and John Haviland. I am deeply grateful for all their encouragement. Heartfelt thanks to Lourdes de León for sharing her connection to and past knowledge of my Tzotzil family with me; without her prior friendship there, I would never have met them. Kami Ahmad unfailingly reads my work with the exacting eye of a scientist; his endurance makes miracles happen. All translations were aided by consultation of Laughlin, 1975. This work was supported by NSF grant #SBR-9222394 and a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Keywords

ProtestantismTzotzilprayerspeech actsgender and languagediscourse analysisagency
Type
Research Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 249 - 283
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahearn, Laura M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology 30:109–37.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1961). Performative utterances. In his Philosophical Papers, 220–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bakhtin, Mikhail (1981). The dialogic imagination. In Michael Holquist (ed.), Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (transl.) Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bauman, Richard (1983). Let your words be few: Symbolism of speaking and silence among seventeenth-century Quakers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Boissevain, Jeremy (1974). Friends of Friends. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brown, Penelope, & Levinson, Stephen C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brusco, Elizabeth (1995). The reformation of machismo: Evangelical conversion and gender in Colombia. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bucholtz, Mary; Liang, A. C.; & Sutton, Laurel A. (1999) (eds.). Reinventing identities: The gendered self in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
Butler, Judith (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
Cameron, Deborah (1996). The language-gender interface: Challenging cooptation. In Bergvall et al. (eds.), Rethinking langauge and gender research, 31–53. London: Longman.
Cameron, Deborah (1997). Theoretical debates in feminist linguistics: Questions of sex and gender. In Ruth Wodak (ed.), Gender and discourse, 21–36. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef
Eckert, Penelope (1990). The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change 1:245–67.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, & McConnell-Ginet, Sally (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21:461–90.Google Scholar
Flora, Cornelia B. (1975). Pentecostal women in Colombia: Religious change and the status of working-class women. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 17:411–25.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan (1995). Language, gender and power: An anthropological review. In Hall & Bucholtz, 169–82.
Gill, Lesley (1990). “Like a veil to cover them”: Women and the Pentecostal movement in La Paz. American Ethnologist 17:708–21.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goody, Esther (1995). Social intelligence and prayer as dialogue, In Esther Goody (ed.), Social intelligence and interaction, 206–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (1999). Constructing opposition within girls' games. In Mary Bucholtz et al. (eds.), Reinventing identities: The gendered self in discourse, 388–410. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gossen, Gary (1974). Chamulas in the world of the sun: Time and space in a Maya oral tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gossen, Gary (1976). Language as ritual substance, In William Samarin (ed.), Language in religious practice, 40–60. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Hall, Kira, & Bucholtz, Mary (1995) (eds.). Gender articulated. New York: Routledge.
Haviland, John B. (1989). “Sure, sure”: Evidence and affect. Text 9:27–68.Google Scholar
Haviland, John B. (1992). Lenguaje ritual sin ritual. Estudios de Cultura Maya 19:427–42.Google Scholar
Haviland, John B. (1996). “We want to borrow your mouth”: Tzotzil marital squabbles. In Charles L. Briggs (ed.), Disorderly discourse: Narrative, conflict, and inequality, 158–203. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hernández Castillo, R. Aída (2001). Histories and stories from Chiapas: Border identities in southern Mexico. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Hill, Jane H. (1995). The voices of Don Gabriel: Responsibility and self in a modern Mexicano narrative. In Dennis Tedlock & Bruce Mannheim (eds.), The dialogic emergence of culture, 97–147. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Hill, Jane H., & Irvine, Judith T. (1992). Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Keane, Webb (2002). Sincerity, “modernity,” and the Protestants. Cultural Anthropology 17:65–92.Google Scholar
Laughlin, Robert M. (1975). The great Tzotzil dictionary of San Lorenzo Zinacantán. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Laughlin, Robert M. (1996). Mayan tales from Zinacantán: Dreams and stories from the People of the Bat. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Le Page, Robert, & Tabouret-Keller, Andreé (1985). Acts of identity: Creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McDermott, R. P., & Tylbor, Henry (1995). On the necessity of collusion in conversation. In D. Tedlock & B. Mannheim (eds.), The dialogic emergence of culture, 218–36. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
McNay, Lois (2000). Gender and agency: Reconfiguring the subject in feminist and social theory. Oxford: Polity.
Maybin, Janet (2000). The new literacy studies: Context, intertextuality, and discourse. In D. Barton et al. (eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context, 197–209. New York: Routledge.
Meyerhoff, Miriam (1996). Dealing with gender identity as a sociolinguistic variable. In Victoria L. Bergvall et al. (eds.), Rethinking language and gender research: Theory and practice, 202–27. London: Longman.
Milroy, Lesley (1987). Language and social networks. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
Morson, Gary Saul, & Emerson, Caryl (1990). Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a prosaics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Norton Pierce, Bonny (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly 29:9–31.Google Scholar
Robbins, Joel (2001). God is nothing but talk: Modernity, language, and prayer in a Papua New Guinea society. American Anthropologist 103:901–12.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne (1999). Communicating gender. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rosenbaum, Brenda (1993). With our heads bowed: The dynamics of gender in a Maya community. Albany, N.Y.: Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, State University of New York.
Sault, Nicole L. (2001). Godparenthood ties among Zapotec women and the effects of Protestant conversion. In James Dow & Alan Sandstrom (eds.), Holy saints and fiery preachers: The anthropology of Protestantism in Mexico and Central America, 117–46. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Searle, John (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5:1–23.Google Scholar
Steigenga, Timothy J., & Smilde, David A. (1999). Wrapped in the holy shawl: The strange case of conservative Christians and gender equality in Latin America. In Christian Smith & Joshua Prokopy (eds.), Latin American religion in motion, 173–86. New York: Routledge.
Sterk, Vernon (1992a). Evangelism with power: Divine healing in the growth of the Tzotzil church. Missiology 20:371–84.Google Scholar
Sterk, Vernon (1992b). The dynamics of persecution. Dissertation, Fuller Theological Seminary.
Vogt, Evon Z. (1970). The Zinacantecos of Mexico: A modern Maya way of life. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Voloshinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.