Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:09:04.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In the heat of the sequence: Interactional features preceding walkouts from argumentative talk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2002

Ian Dersley  and
Anthony J. Wootton
Ian Dersley
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, U.K., iandersley@netscape.net
Anthony J. Wootton
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, U.K., ajw5@york.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines complaint sequences that terminate with one party's walking out, unilaterally, on the other. The analysis of three such extended sequences, using the Conversation Analytic approach, reveals interactional parallels among them. The complaints that precede the walkouts are constructed so as to identify deleterious and generic personal deficiencies. As these sequences develop, they come to focus on faults in the current behavior of those involved. In their final stages, the actions of the leavers appear sensitive to the persistence of behavior that has been deemed to be at fault. This combination of features seems connected to both the unilateral departure and the state of indignation that also becomes evidently present. This invites comparison with other forms of antagonistic dispute, such as those that lead to certain instances of murder.

Keywords

Argumentcomplaintscommunication breakdownconflictemotion
Type
Research Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , October 2001 , pp. 611 - 638
Copyright
2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)