Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:29:44.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The interplay of genres, gender, and language ideology among the Muskogee

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2006

PAMELA INNES
PAMELA INNES
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, pjinnes@uwyo.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Contrary to statements made by previous researchers, Muskogee women are linguistically active in ceremonial public spheres, though through the use of genres that differ significantly from men's. One of the genres performed in these contexts is “gossip,” which is described by some Muskogee men as a dangerous genre. This article explores why Muskogee women's and men's linguistic practices differ so strikingly in the ceremonial sphere, and what women achieve through their use of gossip. It is suggested that consideration of Muskogee language and gender ideologies in regard to these issues shows that gendered language use differences are rational and maintain balance between the genders. Insights from both ideologies also indicate that women's gossip is a powerful genre, the use of which is generally positive for Muskogee society.I would like to thank Linda Alexander, Bertha Tilkens, John Proctor, and other members of the Muskogee community who have allowed me to attend and be part of their interactions. I also would like to express my appreciation to the reviewers of this manuscript for their insightful comments.

Keywords

Muskogee Indiansgender ideologylanguage ideologygossip
Type
Research Article
Information
Language in Society , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 2006 , pp. 231 - 259
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Basso, Keith H. (1990). Stalking with stories. In Western Apache language and culture: Essays in linguistic anthropology, 99–137. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Bauman, Richard, & Briggs, Charles L. (2000). Language philosophy as language ideology: John Locke and Johann Gottfried Herder. In Paul V. Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 139–204. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research.
Bell, Amelia R. (1984). Creek ritual: The path to peace. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.
Bell, Amelia R. (1985). Discourse parallelisms and poetics in Creek formal language. In Gilbert Youmans & Donald Lance (eds.), In memory of Roman Jakobson: Papers from the 1984 Mid-America Linguistics Conference, 323–30. Columbia, MO: Linguistics Area Program.
Bell, Amelia R. (1990). Separate people: Speaking of Creek men and women. American Anthropologist 92:332–45.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Jörg R. (1993). Discreet indiscretions: The social organization of gossip. John Bednarz, Jr., trans. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Bernikow, Louise (1980). Among women. New York: Crown.
Braund, Kathryn E. H. (1993). Deerskins and duffels: Creek Indian trade with Anglo-America, 1685–1815. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Coates, Jennifer (1988). Gossip revisited: Language in all-female groups. In Jennifer Coates & Deborah Cameron (eds.), Women in their speech communities: New perspectives on language and sex. London: Longman.
Eckert, Penelope, & McConnell-Ginet, Sally (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21:461–90.Google Scholar
Errington, Joseph (2000). Indonesian('s) authority. In Paul V. Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language, 205–27.
Fishman, Pamela M. (1980). Conversational insecurity. In Howard Giles et al. (eds.), Language: Social psychological perspectives, 127–32. Oxford: Pergamon.
Fogelson, Raymond D. (1962). The Cherokee ball game: A study in Southeastern ethnology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Goffman, Erving (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Harding, Susan (1975). Women and words in a Spanish village. In Rayna Reiter (ed.), Toward an anthropology of women, 283–308. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Haviland, John B. (1977). Gossip, reputation, and knowledge in Zinacantan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hill, Jane H. (1998). “Today there is no respect”: Nostalgia, “respect,” and oppositional discourse in Mexicano (Nahuatl) language ideology. In Bambi B. Schieffelin et al. (eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory, 68–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Howard, James H., & Lena, Willie (1984). Oklahoma Seminoles: Medicines, magic, and religion. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Innes, Pamela (1991). Codeswitching in formal Creek discourse. MA thesis, University of Oklahoma.
Innes, Pamela (1997). From one to many, from many to one: Speech communities among the Mvskoke stompdance population. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oklahoma.
Innes, Pamela (2004a). The Creek in the West. In Raymond D. Fogelson (ed.), Handbook of North American Indians, volume 14: Southeast. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Innes, Pamela (2004b). How changing attitudes toward fluency among the Muskogee/Creek affect retention of medicine-making language. In Margaret Bender (ed.), Proceedings of the Southern Anthropological Society. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Innes, Pamela; Alexander, Linda; & Tilkens, Bertha (2004). Muskogee language: Mvskoke emponvkv. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Irvine, Judith T. (1998). Ideologies of honorific language. In Bambi B. Schieffelin et al. (eds.), Language ideologies, 51–67.
Jackson, Jason Baird (2000). Signaling the Creator: Indian football as ritual performance among the Yuchi and their neighbors. Southern Folklore 57:33–64.Google Scholar
Jackson, Jason Baird (2003). Yuchi ceremonial life: Performance, meaning, and tradition in a contemporary American Indian community. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Johnson, Fern L., & Aries, Elizabeth J. (1983). The talk of women friends. Women's Studies International Quarterly 6:353–61.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara (1993). Community and contest: Midwestern men and women creating their worlds in conversational storytelling. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Gender and conversational interaction, 62–79. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jones, Deborah (1980). Gossip: Notes on women's oral culture. Women's Studies International Quarterly 3:193–98.Google Scholar
Kramarae, Cheris (1981). Women and men speaking. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Kulick, Don (1998). Anger, gender, language shift, and the politics of revelation in a Papua New Guinean village. In Bambi B. Schieffelin et al. (eds.), Language Ideologies, 87–102.
Lakoff, Robin Tolmach (1975). Language and women's place. New York: Harper & Row.
Lakoff, Robin Tolmach (1990). Talking power: The politics of language. New York: Basic Books.
MacKinnon, Catherine A. (1993). Only words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Maltz, Daniel N., & Borker, Ruth A. (1982). A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In John J. Gumperz (ed.), Language and social identity, 196–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, Jack B.; Mauldin, Margaret McKane; & McGirt, Juanita (2004). The Creek stories of Earnest Gouge. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Mooney, James (1891). The sacred formulas of the Cherokee. Bureau of American Ethnology 7th Annual Report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Mooney, James (1932). The Swimmer manuscript: Cherokee sacred formulas and medicinal prescriptions. Bureau of American Ethnology 99th Annual Report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Moore, John H. (1988). The Mvskoke national question in Oklahoma. Science and Society 52:163–90.Google Scholar
Opler, Morris E. (1952). The Creek “town” and the problem of Creek Indian political reorganization. In Edward H. Spicer (ed.), Human problems in technological change. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Ortner, Sherry B. (1974). Is female to male as nature is to culture? In Michelle Z. Rosaldo & Louise Lamphere (eds.), Woman, culture, and society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Paine, Robert (1967). What is gossip about? An alternative hypothesis. Man 2:278–85.Google Scholar
Philips, Susan U. (2000). Constructing a Tongan nation-state through language ideology in the courtroom. In Paul V. Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language, 229–57.
Reiter, Rayna R. (1975). Men and women in the South of France: Public and private domains. In Rayna Reiter (ed.), Toward an anthropology of women, 252–82. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Roark-Calnek, Sue N. (1977). Indian way in Oklahoma: Transactions in honor and legitimacy. Ph.D. dissertation, Bryn Mawr College.
Rosaldo, Michelle Zimbalist (1974). Woman, culture, and society: A theoretical overview. In Michelle Z. Rosaldo & Louise Lamphere (eds.), Woman, culture, and society.
Sanday, Peggy R. (1974). Female status in the public domain. In Michelle Z. Rosaldo & Louise Lamphere (eds.), Woman, culture, and society.
Schiffman, Harold (1996). Linguistic culture and language policy. London: Routledge.
Schultz, Jack M. (1999). The Seminole Baptist churches of Oklahoma: Maintaining a traditional community. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Silverstein, Michael (1977). Cultural prerequisites to grammatical analysis. In Muriel Saville-Troike (ed.), Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics, 1977, 139–52. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Speck, Frank G. (1911). Ceremonial songs of the Creek and Yuchi Indians. University of Pennsylvania Museum Anthropological Publications, vol. 1, no. 2. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Museum.
Spoehr, Alexander (1947). Changing kinship systems: A study in the acculturation of the Creek, Cherokee, and Choctaw. Field Museum of Natural History Anthropological Series 33. Chicago: Field Museum of Natural History.
Sturtevant, William C. (1971). Creek into Seminole. In Eleanor B. Leacock & Nancy O. Lurie (eds.), North American Indians in historical perspective. New York: Random House.
Swanton, John R. (1928a). Social organization and social usages of the Indians of the Creek Confederacy. Forty-Second Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Swanton, John R. (1928b). Religious beliefs and medical practices of the Creek Indians. Forty-Second Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Swanton, John R. (1929). Myths and tales of the Southeastern Indians. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 88. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Reprinted by AMS Press, 1976.
Tannen, Deborah. (1994). Gender and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tuggle, William O. (1973). Shem, Ham, and Japheth; The papers of W. O. Tuggle, comprising his Indian diary, sketches & observations, myths and Washington journal in the Territory and at the capital, 1879–1882. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Wright, J. Leitch, Jr. (1986). Creeks and Seminoles: Destruction and regeneration of the Muscogulge people. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Yamada, Haru (1997). Different games, different rules: Why Americans and Japanese misunderstand each other. Oxford: Oxford University Press.